OUTPACE: Outcomes of urinary incontinence treatment in primary care – APP co-management and electronic consult

IF 2 3区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
C. Pangelina , J. Bergman , T. Cheng , R. Fantus , A. Galvez , G. Gin , T. Grisales , J. Koola , E.S. Lukacz , M. Millen , A. Moore , K. Okamuro , D. Reuben , Y. Santiago-Lastra , J. Singer , M. Suarez , M. Tai-Seale , F. Vaida , C. Souders , J. Anger
{"title":"OUTPACE: Outcomes of urinary incontinence treatment in primary care – APP co-management and electronic consult","authors":"C. Pangelina ,&nbsp;J. Bergman ,&nbsp;T. Cheng ,&nbsp;R. Fantus ,&nbsp;A. Galvez ,&nbsp;G. Gin ,&nbsp;T. Grisales ,&nbsp;J. Koola ,&nbsp;E.S. Lukacz ,&nbsp;M. Millen ,&nbsp;A. Moore ,&nbsp;K. Okamuro ,&nbsp;D. Reuben ,&nbsp;Y. Santiago-Lastra ,&nbsp;J. Singer ,&nbsp;M. Suarez ,&nbsp;M. Tai-Seale ,&nbsp;F. Vaida ,&nbsp;C. Souders ,&nbsp;J. Anger","doi":"10.1016/j.cct.2025.107922","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Quality of care (QOC) research surrounding urinary incontinence (UI) management is limited, yet electronic (<em>E</em>-consult) and Advanced Practice Provider (APP) co-managements have proven QOC impact. We describe the design and methodology of a cluster randomized comparative effectiveness of these primary care provider (PCP) referral practices.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Outcomes of Urinary Incontinence Treatment in Primary Care – APP Co-management and Electronic Consult (OUTPACE) is a pragmatic clinical trial being conducted at the University of California – San Diego (UCSD), the University of California – Los Angeles (UCLA), and the University of Kansas Medical Center (KU). Approximately 300 providers within 60 PCP offices are randomized to utilize either <em>E</em>-consult or APP co-management. The first aim is to compare the relative effectiveness of these two referral mechanisms in improving UI care over a six-month period. The second and third aims include patient-reported outcomes (PROs) using validated instruments, patient knowledge, and participation in shared decision making. Secondary analyses will identify potential disparities in UI QOC related to race, ethnicity, and spoken language.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Provider and patient enrollment began in February 2024 and is ongoing. Baseline provider QOC is assessed through retrospective chart review of 3–5 patient visits with an ICD-10 code for UI. PROs are assessed at baseline, three-month, and six-month timepoints. Both provider and patient knowledge is measured using a Pelvic Floor Awareness and Knowledge Survey at baseline and six-month timepoints.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>OUTPACE will determine whether the <em>E</em>-consult or APP co-management referral mechanism has a greater impact on provider QOC, patient-reported UI outcomes, and shared decision-making scores.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10636,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary clinical trials","volume":"153 ","pages":"Article 107922"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary clinical trials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1551714425001168","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Quality of care (QOC) research surrounding urinary incontinence (UI) management is limited, yet electronic (E-consult) and Advanced Practice Provider (APP) co-managements have proven QOC impact. We describe the design and methodology of a cluster randomized comparative effectiveness of these primary care provider (PCP) referral practices.

Methods

Outcomes of Urinary Incontinence Treatment in Primary Care – APP Co-management and Electronic Consult (OUTPACE) is a pragmatic clinical trial being conducted at the University of California – San Diego (UCSD), the University of California – Los Angeles (UCLA), and the University of Kansas Medical Center (KU). Approximately 300 providers within 60 PCP offices are randomized to utilize either E-consult or APP co-management. The first aim is to compare the relative effectiveness of these two referral mechanisms in improving UI care over a six-month period. The second and third aims include patient-reported outcomes (PROs) using validated instruments, patient knowledge, and participation in shared decision making. Secondary analyses will identify potential disparities in UI QOC related to race, ethnicity, and spoken language.

Results

Provider and patient enrollment began in February 2024 and is ongoing. Baseline provider QOC is assessed through retrospective chart review of 3–5 patient visits with an ICD-10 code for UI. PROs are assessed at baseline, three-month, and six-month timepoints. Both provider and patient knowledge is measured using a Pelvic Floor Awareness and Knowledge Survey at baseline and six-month timepoints.

Conclusions

OUTPACE will determine whether the E-consult or APP co-management referral mechanism has a greater impact on provider QOC, patient-reported UI outcomes, and shared decision-making scores.
OUTPACE:尿失禁在初级保健治疗的结果- APP联合管理和电子咨询
关于尿失禁(UI)管理的护理质量(QOC)研究有限,但电子(E-consult)和高级实践提供者(APP)联合管理已经证明了对QOC的影响。我们描述了这些初级保健提供者(PCP)转诊实践的随机比较有效性集群的设计和方法。初级保健尿失禁治疗的结果- APP联合管理和电子咨询(OUTPACE)是一项实用的临床试验,正在加州大学圣地亚哥分校(UCSD)、加州大学洛杉矶分校(UCLA)和堪萨斯大学医学中心(KU)进行。在60个PCP办公室中,大约300个提供者被随机分配使用电子咨询或APP共同管理。第一个目的是比较这两种转诊机制在六个月期间改善UI护理方面的相对有效性。第二个和第三个目标包括使用经过验证的仪器、患者知识和参与共同决策的患者报告结果(PROs)。二次分析将确定与种族、民族和口语相关的UI QOC的潜在差异。提供者和患者登记于2024年2月开始,目前正在进行中。基线提供者QOC通过对3-5例患者就诊的回顾性图表审查进行评估,并使用ICD-10代码进行UI。在基线、3个月和6个月时间点对PROs进行评估。在基线和六个月的时间点使用盆底意识和知识调查来测量提供者和患者的知识。结论soutpace将决定电子咨询或APP共同管理转诊机制对提供者QOC、患者报告的UI结果和共享决策评分的影响更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.50%
发文量
281
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: Contemporary Clinical Trials is an international peer reviewed journal that publishes manuscripts pertaining to all aspects of clinical trials, including, but not limited to, design, conduct, analysis, regulation and ethics. Manuscripts submitted should appeal to a readership drawn from disciplines including medicine, biostatistics, epidemiology, computer science, management science, behavioural science, pharmaceutical science, and bioethics. Full-length papers and short communications not exceeding 1,500 words, as well as systemic reviews of clinical trials and methodologies will be published. Perspectives/commentaries on current issues and the impact of clinical trials on the practice of medicine and health policy are also welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信