Louis Adedapo Gomez , Jan Claassen , Samantha Kleinberg
{"title":"Causal inference for time series datasets with partially overlapping variables","authors":"Louis Adedapo Gomez , Jan Claassen , Samantha Kleinberg","doi":"10.1016/j.jbi.2025.104828","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective:</h3><div>Healthcare data provides a unique opportunity to learn causal relationships but the largest datasets, such as from hospitals or intensive care units, are often observational and do not standardize variables collected for all patients. Rather, the variables depend on a patient’s health status, treatment plan, and differences between providers. This poses major challenges for causal inference, which either must restrict analysis to patients with complete data (reducing power) or learn patient-specific models (making it difficult to generalize). While missing variables can lead to confounding, variables absent for one individual are often measured in another.</div></div><div><h3>Methods:</h3><div>We propose a novel method, called Causal Model Combination for Time Series (CMC-TS), to learn causal relationships from time series with partially overlapping variable sets. CMC-TS overcomes errors by specifically leveraging partial overlap between datasets (e.g., patients) to iteratively reconstruct missing variables and correct errors by reweighting inferences using shared information across datasets. We evaluated CMC-TS and compared it to the state of the art on both simulated data and real-world data from stroke patients admitted to a neurological intensive care unit.</div></div><div><h3>Results:</h3><div>On simulated data, CMC-TS had the fewest false discoveries and highest F1-score compared to baselines. On real data from stroke patients in a neurological intensive care unit, we found fewer implausible and more highly ranked plausible causes of a clinically important adverse event.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion:</h3><div>Our approach may lead to better use of observational healthcare data for causal inference, by enabling causal inference from patient data with partially overlapping variable sets.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15263,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biomedical Informatics","volume":"166 ","pages":"Article 104828"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biomedical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1532046425000577","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective:
Healthcare data provides a unique opportunity to learn causal relationships but the largest datasets, such as from hospitals or intensive care units, are often observational and do not standardize variables collected for all patients. Rather, the variables depend on a patient’s health status, treatment plan, and differences between providers. This poses major challenges for causal inference, which either must restrict analysis to patients with complete data (reducing power) or learn patient-specific models (making it difficult to generalize). While missing variables can lead to confounding, variables absent for one individual are often measured in another.
Methods:
We propose a novel method, called Causal Model Combination for Time Series (CMC-TS), to learn causal relationships from time series with partially overlapping variable sets. CMC-TS overcomes errors by specifically leveraging partial overlap between datasets (e.g., patients) to iteratively reconstruct missing variables and correct errors by reweighting inferences using shared information across datasets. We evaluated CMC-TS and compared it to the state of the art on both simulated data and real-world data from stroke patients admitted to a neurological intensive care unit.
Results:
On simulated data, CMC-TS had the fewest false discoveries and highest F1-score compared to baselines. On real data from stroke patients in a neurological intensive care unit, we found fewer implausible and more highly ranked plausible causes of a clinically important adverse event.
Conclusion:
Our approach may lead to better use of observational healthcare data for causal inference, by enabling causal inference from patient data with partially overlapping variable sets.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Biomedical Informatics reflects a commitment to high-quality original research papers, reviews, and commentaries in the area of biomedical informatics methodology. Although we publish articles motivated by applications in the biomedical sciences (for example, clinical medicine, health care, population health, and translational bioinformatics), the journal emphasizes reports of new methodologies and techniques that have general applicability and that form the basis for the evolving science of biomedical informatics. Articles on medical devices; evaluations of implemented systems (including clinical trials of information technologies); or papers that provide insight into a biological process, a specific disease, or treatment options would generally be more suitable for publication in other venues. Papers on applications of signal processing and image analysis are often more suitable for biomedical engineering journals or other informatics journals, although we do publish papers that emphasize the information management and knowledge representation/modeling issues that arise in the storage and use of biological signals and images. System descriptions are welcome if they illustrate and substantiate the underlying methodology that is the principal focus of the report and an effort is made to address the generalizability and/or range of application of that methodology. Note also that, given the international nature of JBI, papers that deal with specific languages other than English, or with country-specific health systems or approaches, are acceptable for JBI only if they offer generalizable lessons that are relevant to the broad JBI readership, regardless of their country, language, culture, or health system.