Clinical factors predicting the rate of cognitive decline in a US memory clinic: An electronic health record study

IF 4.9 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Roy Adams, Jeannie-Marie Leoutsakos, Milap A. Nowrangi, Esther S. Oh, Paul B. Rosenberg, Konstantina Skolariki, Sevil Yasar, Peter P. Zandi, Constantine G. Lyketsos
{"title":"Clinical factors predicting the rate of cognitive decline in a US memory clinic: An electronic health record study","authors":"Roy Adams,&nbsp;Jeannie-Marie Leoutsakos,&nbsp;Milap A. Nowrangi,&nbsp;Esther S. Oh,&nbsp;Paul B. Rosenberg,&nbsp;Konstantina Skolariki,&nbsp;Sevil Yasar,&nbsp;Peter P. Zandi,&nbsp;Constantine G. Lyketsos","doi":"10.1002/trc2.70070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> INTRODUCTION</h3>\n \n <p>Dementia progression is heterogeneous and predicting who will decline quickly remains an open problem. Most work in this area has focused on volunteer-based cohorts, which are subject to recruitment biases. Instead, we examine predictors of rate of cognitive decline in cognitive assessment scores using electronic health record (EHR) data from a US memory clinic.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> METHODS</h3>\n \n <p>Data include patients with their first memory clinic visit (baseline) between January 1, 2014 and May 31, 2024. We used a discrete-time model to identify significant predictors of baseline and 6 month change in Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores (Montreal Cognitive Assessment scores were converted to MMSE equivalents for analysis). Inverse probability weighting was used to account for selection and censoring biases and <i>p</i> values were adjusted for multiple comparisons.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> RESULTS</h3>\n \n <p>The cohort included 9583 patients, of which 7113 had a baseline cognitive assessment. Average MMSE at baseline was 23.2. Variables associated with lower baseline MMSE included female sex, non-White race, Medicaid enrollment, baseline dementia diagnosis, and cholinesterase inhibitor prescription, while higher scores were associated with prior diagnoses of chronic pain or fatigue. Quicker post-baseline decline was associated with older age, dementia diagnoses, and cholinesterase inhibitor prescription, while slower decline was associated with a higher number of total prescriptions, distance from home to clinic, and Social Deprivation Index. Notably, rate of decline was not associated with mild cognitive impairment, other non-dementia cognitive impairment, or any of the comorbidities considered.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> DISCUSSION</h3>\n \n <p>While several significant predictors were identified, the lack of associations with broad categories of comorbidities and social determinants of health suggest that finer grained predictors may be needed. Additionally, the finding that cholinesterase inhibitor prescriptions predicted quicker decline merits additional investigation in real-world samples. The model developed in this work may serve as a first step toward an EHR-based progression risk tool.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Highlights</h3>\n \n <div>\n <ul>\n \n <li>In a memory clinic setting, faster decline in Mini-Mental State Examination scores was associated with age, dementia diagnosis, and cholinesterase inhibitor or memantine prescription.</li>\n \n <li>Slower decline was associated with the patient's total number of prescriptions.</li>\n \n <li>Neither race nor ethnicity were associated with rate of decline, nor were baseline mild cognitive impairment, other non-dementia cognitive impairment, diabetes, hypertension, obesity, depression, anxiety, chronic pain/fatigue, or hearing loss.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":53225,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer''s and Dementia: Translational Research and Clinical Interventions","volume":"11 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/trc2.70070","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alzheimer''s and Dementia: Translational Research and Clinical Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/trc2.70070","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Dementia progression is heterogeneous and predicting who will decline quickly remains an open problem. Most work in this area has focused on volunteer-based cohorts, which are subject to recruitment biases. Instead, we examine predictors of rate of cognitive decline in cognitive assessment scores using electronic health record (EHR) data from a US memory clinic.

METHODS

Data include patients with their first memory clinic visit (baseline) between January 1, 2014 and May 31, 2024. We used a discrete-time model to identify significant predictors of baseline and 6 month change in Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores (Montreal Cognitive Assessment scores were converted to MMSE equivalents for analysis). Inverse probability weighting was used to account for selection and censoring biases and p values were adjusted for multiple comparisons.

RESULTS

The cohort included 9583 patients, of which 7113 had a baseline cognitive assessment. Average MMSE at baseline was 23.2. Variables associated with lower baseline MMSE included female sex, non-White race, Medicaid enrollment, baseline dementia diagnosis, and cholinesterase inhibitor prescription, while higher scores were associated with prior diagnoses of chronic pain or fatigue. Quicker post-baseline decline was associated with older age, dementia diagnoses, and cholinesterase inhibitor prescription, while slower decline was associated with a higher number of total prescriptions, distance from home to clinic, and Social Deprivation Index. Notably, rate of decline was not associated with mild cognitive impairment, other non-dementia cognitive impairment, or any of the comorbidities considered.

DISCUSSION

While several significant predictors were identified, the lack of associations with broad categories of comorbidities and social determinants of health suggest that finer grained predictors may be needed. Additionally, the finding that cholinesterase inhibitor prescriptions predicted quicker decline merits additional investigation in real-world samples. The model developed in this work may serve as a first step toward an EHR-based progression risk tool.

Highlights

  • In a memory clinic setting, faster decline in Mini-Mental State Examination scores was associated with age, dementia diagnosis, and cholinesterase inhibitor or memantine prescription.
  • Slower decline was associated with the patient's total number of prescriptions.
  • Neither race nor ethnicity were associated with rate of decline, nor were baseline mild cognitive impairment, other non-dementia cognitive impairment, diabetes, hypertension, obesity, depression, anxiety, chronic pain/fatigue, or hearing loss.

Abstract Image

预测美国记忆诊所认知衰退率的临床因素:一项电子健康记录研究
痴呆的进展是异质性的,预测谁会迅速衰退仍然是一个悬而未决的问题。这一领域的大多数工作都集中在以志愿者为基础的群体上,这容易受到招聘偏见的影响。相反,我们使用来自美国记忆诊所的电子健康记录(EHR)数据来检查认知评估分数中认知衰退率的预测因子。方法数据包括2014年1月1日至2024年5月31日首次记忆门诊就诊的患者(基线)。我们使用离散时间模型来确定基本精神状态检查(MMSE)得分的基线和6个月变化的重要预测因子(蒙特利尔认知评估得分转换为MMSE当量进行分析)。使用逆概率加权来解释选择和审查偏差,并调整p值以进行多次比较。结果该队列包括9583例患者,其中7113例有基线认知评估。基线时平均MMSE为23.2。与较低基线MMSE相关的变量包括女性性别、非白人种族、医疗补助登记、基线痴呆诊断和胆碱酯酶抑制剂处方,而较高的分数与先前诊断的慢性疼痛或疲劳相关。基线后更快的下降与年龄、痴呆诊断和胆碱酯酶抑制剂处方有关,而较慢的下降与总处方数量、从家到诊所的距离和社会剥夺指数有关。值得注意的是,下降率与轻度认知障碍、其他非痴呆性认知障碍或任何合并症无关。虽然确定了几个重要的预测因素,但缺乏与广泛类别的合并症和健康的社会决定因素的关联,这表明可能需要更精细的预测因素。此外,胆碱酯酶抑制剂处方预测更快下降的发现值得在现实世界样本中进行额外的研究。在这项工作中开发的模型可以作为迈向基于ehr的进展风险工具的第一步。在记忆临床设置中,迷你精神状态检查分数的快速下降与年龄、痴呆诊断、胆碱酯酶抑制剂或美金刚处方有关。较慢的下降与患者的处方总数有关。种族和民族与下降率无关,基线轻度认知障碍、其他非痴呆性认知障碍、糖尿病、高血压、肥胖、抑郁、焦虑、慢性疼痛/疲劳或听力损失也无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
2.10%
发文量
134
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Alzheimer''s & Dementia: Translational Research & Clinical Interventions (TRCI) is a peer-reviewed, open access,journal from the Alzheimer''s Association®. The journal seeks to bridge the full scope of explorations between basic research on drug discovery and clinical studies, validating putative therapies for aging-related chronic brain conditions that affect cognition, motor functions, and other behavioral or clinical symptoms associated with all forms dementia and Alzheimer''s disease. The journal will publish findings from diverse domains of research and disciplines to accelerate the conversion of abstract facts into practical knowledge: specifically, to translate what is learned at the bench into bedside applications. The journal seeks to publish articles that go beyond a singular emphasis on either basic drug discovery research or clinical research. Rather, an important theme of articles will be the linkages between and among the various discrete steps in the complex continuum of therapy development. For rapid communication among a multidisciplinary research audience involving the range of therapeutic interventions, TRCI will consider only original contributions that include feature length research articles, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, brief reports, narrative reviews, commentaries, letters, perspectives, and research news that would advance wide range of interventions to ameliorate symptoms or alter the progression of chronic neurocognitive disorders such as dementia and Alzheimer''s disease. The journal will publish on topics related to medicine, geriatrics, neuroscience, neurophysiology, neurology, psychiatry, clinical psychology, bioinformatics, pharmaco-genetics, regulatory issues, health economics, pharmacoeconomics, and public health policy as these apply to preclinical and clinical research on therapeutics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信