A Multi-Species Occupancy Modelling Approach to Access the Impacts of Ecological Covariates on Terrestrial Vertebrates in a Tropical Hotspot in Central, Cameroon

IF 1.1 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q4 ECOLOGY
Ernest D. B. Fotsing, Meigang M. F. Kamkeng
{"title":"A Multi-Species Occupancy Modelling Approach to Access the Impacts of Ecological Covariates on Terrestrial Vertebrates in a Tropical Hotspot in Central, Cameroon","authors":"Ernest D. B. Fotsing,&nbsp;Meigang M. F. Kamkeng","doi":"10.1111/aje.70048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Mammalian communities living in tropical forests, particularly those in ecological transition zones, are under constant threat from human activities. In many regions, baseline data on mammal richness, occupancy, detection probability and the environmental factors that influence these metrics are lacking. As a key metric for guiding conservation decisions, species richness can be underestimated due to varying detection probabilities, leading to species being overlooked. Advances in technology and methodology have revolutionised wildlife monitoring, fostering the increase of multi-species occupancy models (MSOMs) for efficient studies of community, shifting focus from single species to entire communities. MSOMs, hierarchical models that share information across species via random effects, address imperfect detection to provide accurate and unbiased species richness estimates. To fill this information gap, we used cameras trap data from Mpem and Djim National Park, Central Cameroun. We used generalised linear models and a model selection approach to evaluate factors affecting species detection events. Similarly, we used MSOMs within a Bayesian hierarchical framework to evaluate our initial species richness estimate at each camera trap location and to understand the influence of environmental covariates on the occupancy and detection probability of 19 vertebrates recorded in the area to inform management decisions for these species. From 915 independent photographic events obtained over 1700 days of capture, the study results highlight the importance of habitat, distance to river, normalised difference vegetation index and topographic position index (TPI) in explaining patterns of detection events. We found that forest (GLM: <i>B</i> 0.31, IRR 1.36, CI 0.14–0.48, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), NDVI (GLM: <i>B</i> 0.31, IRR 1.36, CI 0.21–0.41, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) and TPI (GLM: <i>B</i> 0.17, IRR 1.19, CI 0.08–0.26, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) were positively associated with species detection events, whereas distance to river (GLM: <i>B</i> −0,19, IRR 0.83, CI 0.0.27 to (−0.11), <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) was negatively associated with species detection events. However, the mean probability of community occupancy was 0.33 ± 0.10 [2.5%–97.5% CI: 0.17, 0.54], while the mean probability of community detection was 0.07 ± 0.02 [2.5%–95% CI: 0.04, 0.12], indicating that, on average, approximately 33% of the sites are likely to be occupied by the community of interest, with a 7% probability of detection at occupied sites. After accounting for imperfect detection, the maximum occupancy and detection probability estimated from the MSOMs were 0.88 ± 0.07 (2.5%–97.5% CI: 0.71–0.98) and 0.22 ± 0.2 (2.5%–97.5% CI: 0.18–0.27) for <i>Philantomba monticola</i>, respectively. Globally, the community responses were close to zero and relatively weak, probably due to mixed responses at the species level. Despite their weak effect, distance to road (<i>β:</i> −1.53 ± 1.97 [2.5%–97.5% CI: −1.72–5.62]) and NDVI (<i>β:</i> −0.09 ± 0.22 [2.5%–97.5% CI: −0.50–0.38]) had a negative significant effect on occupancy. However, there were significant responses at the species level with <i>Cephalophus nigrifrons</i>, for example, exhibiting a strong response to NDVI. This study contributes to baseline information on the ecology of mammal communities in Central Cameroon and supports the need for future multi-season surveys to understand the influence of temporal factors on community occupancy and richness in the area.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":7844,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Ecology","volume":"63 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal of Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aje.70048","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mammalian communities living in tropical forests, particularly those in ecological transition zones, are under constant threat from human activities. In many regions, baseline data on mammal richness, occupancy, detection probability and the environmental factors that influence these metrics are lacking. As a key metric for guiding conservation decisions, species richness can be underestimated due to varying detection probabilities, leading to species being overlooked. Advances in technology and methodology have revolutionised wildlife monitoring, fostering the increase of multi-species occupancy models (MSOMs) for efficient studies of community, shifting focus from single species to entire communities. MSOMs, hierarchical models that share information across species via random effects, address imperfect detection to provide accurate and unbiased species richness estimates. To fill this information gap, we used cameras trap data from Mpem and Djim National Park, Central Cameroun. We used generalised linear models and a model selection approach to evaluate factors affecting species detection events. Similarly, we used MSOMs within a Bayesian hierarchical framework to evaluate our initial species richness estimate at each camera trap location and to understand the influence of environmental covariates on the occupancy and detection probability of 19 vertebrates recorded in the area to inform management decisions for these species. From 915 independent photographic events obtained over 1700 days of capture, the study results highlight the importance of habitat, distance to river, normalised difference vegetation index and topographic position index (TPI) in explaining patterns of detection events. We found that forest (GLM: B 0.31, IRR 1.36, CI 0.14–0.48, p < 0.001), NDVI (GLM: B 0.31, IRR 1.36, CI 0.21–0.41, p < 0.001) and TPI (GLM: B 0.17, IRR 1.19, CI 0.08–0.26, p < 0.001) were positively associated with species detection events, whereas distance to river (GLM: B −0,19, IRR 0.83, CI 0.0.27 to (−0.11), p < 0.001) was negatively associated with species detection events. However, the mean probability of community occupancy was 0.33 ± 0.10 [2.5%–97.5% CI: 0.17, 0.54], while the mean probability of community detection was 0.07 ± 0.02 [2.5%–95% CI: 0.04, 0.12], indicating that, on average, approximately 33% of the sites are likely to be occupied by the community of interest, with a 7% probability of detection at occupied sites. After accounting for imperfect detection, the maximum occupancy and detection probability estimated from the MSOMs were 0.88 ± 0.07 (2.5%–97.5% CI: 0.71–0.98) and 0.22 ± 0.2 (2.5%–97.5% CI: 0.18–0.27) for Philantomba monticola, respectively. Globally, the community responses were close to zero and relatively weak, probably due to mixed responses at the species level. Despite their weak effect, distance to road (β: −1.53 ± 1.97 [2.5%–97.5% CI: −1.72–5.62]) and NDVI (β: −0.09 ± 0.22 [2.5%–97.5% CI: −0.50–0.38]) had a negative significant effect on occupancy. However, there were significant responses at the species level with Cephalophus nigrifrons, for example, exhibiting a strong response to NDVI. This study contributes to baseline information on the ecology of mammal communities in Central Cameroon and supports the need for future multi-season surveys to understand the influence of temporal factors on community occupancy and richness in the area.

多物种占用建模方法获取生态协变量对喀麦隆中部热带热点陆生脊椎动物的影响
生活在热带森林,特别是生态过渡带的哺乳动物群落不断受到人类活动的威胁。在许多地区,缺乏关于哺乳动物丰富度、占用率、发现概率和影响这些指标的环境因素的基线数据。物种丰富度作为指导保护决策的关键指标,由于检测概率的变化,物种丰富度可能被低估,导致物种被忽视。技术和方法的进步彻底改变了野生动物监测,促进了多物种占用模型(MSOMs)的增加,以有效地研究群落,将重点从单一物种转移到整个群落。MSOMs是一种通过随机效应在物种之间共享信息的分层模型,它解决了不完美的检测问题,提供了准确和无偏的物种丰富度估计。为了填补这一信息空白,我们使用了来自喀麦隆中部Mpem和Djim国家公园的摄像机捕获数据。我们使用广义线性模型和模型选择方法来评估影响物种检测事件的因素。同样,我们在贝叶斯层次框架内使用MSOMs来评估每个摄像机陷阱位置的初始物种丰富度估计值,并了解环境协变量对该地区记录的19种脊椎动物的占用率和检测概率的影响,从而为这些物种的管理决策提供信息。从1700天的915个独立的摄影事件中,研究结果强调了栖息地、与河流的距离、归一化植被指数和地形位置指数(TPI)在解释探测事件模式中的重要性。我们发现森林(GLM: B 0.31, IRR 1.36, CI 0.14-0.48, p < 0.001)、NDVI (GLM: B 0.31, IRR 1.36, CI 0.21-0.41, p < 0.001)和TPI (GLM: B 0.17, IRR 1.19, CI 0.08-0.26, p < 0.001)与物种检测事件呈正相关,而与河流的距离(GLM: B - 0,19, IRR 0.83, CI 0.0.27 ~ (- 0.11), p < 0.001)与物种检测事件呈负相关。然而,群落占用的平均概率为0.33±0.10 [2.5% ~ 97.5% CI: 0.17, 0.54],而群落被发现的平均概率为0.07±0.02 [2.5% ~ 95% CI: 0.04, 0.12],这表明,平均而言,约33%的站点可能被感兴趣的社区占用,在被占用的站点上被发现的概率为7%。在考虑不完全检测后,从MSOMs估计的最大占用率和检测概率分别为0.88±0.07 (2.5% ~ 97.5% CI: 0.71 ~ 0.98)和0.22±0.2 (2.5% ~ 97.5% CI: 0.18 ~ 0.27)。在全球范围内,群落的响应接近于零,相对较弱,可能是由于物种水平上的混合响应。与道路的距离(β: - 1.53±1.97 [2.5% ~ 97.5% CI: - 1.72 ~ 5.62])和NDVI (β: - 0.09±0.22 [2.5% ~ 97.5% CI: - 0.50 ~ 0.38])对占用率有显著的负向影响。然而,在物种水平上有显著的响应,例如黑头鲸对NDVI表现出强烈的响应。这项研究为喀麦隆中部哺乳动物群落的生态学提供了基线信息,并支持未来进行多季节调查的需求,以了解该地区时间因素对群落占用和丰富度的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
African Journal of Ecology
African Journal of Ecology 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
134
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: African Journal of Ecology (formerly East African Wildlife Journal) publishes original scientific research into the ecology and conservation of the animals and plants of Africa. It has a wide circulation both within and outside Africa and is the foremost research journal on the ecology of the continent. In addition to original articles, the Journal publishes comprehensive reviews on topical subjects and brief communications of preliminary results.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信