Comparative balanced salt solution and 6 ​% hydroxyethyl starch in goal-directed therapy for major abdominal surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Rui Lu , Srisuluk Kacha , Natsuda Phothikun , Atirut Supphapipat , Kaweesak Chittawatanarat
{"title":"Comparative balanced salt solution and 6 ​% hydroxyethyl starch in goal-directed therapy for major abdominal surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Rui Lu ,&nbsp;Srisuluk Kacha ,&nbsp;Natsuda Phothikun ,&nbsp;Atirut Supphapipat ,&nbsp;Kaweesak Chittawatanarat","doi":"10.1016/j.amjsurg.2025.116355","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) improves postoperative outcomes in various surgeries, but the optimal fluid choice between balanced salt solutions (BSS) and hydroxyethyl starch (HES) remains debated. This meta-analysis compared postoperative outcomes of GDFT using BSS versus 6 ​% HES in elective major abdominal surgery. Comprehensive database searches identified eight RCTs (1739 patients) published between 2000 and 2024. No significant differences were found in overall postoperative complications [RR 1.04 (95 ​% CI 0.90–1.20); p ​= ​0.59], including renal, cardiovascular, respiratory complications, or mortality. However, BSS required significantly higher intraoperative fluid volumes [SMD 0.61 (95 ​% CI 0.42–0.80); p ​&lt; ​0.001] and led to greater postoperative fluid balance [SMD 0.39 (95 ​% CI 0.20–0.59); p ​&lt; ​0.001]. 6 ​% HES should not be used routinely. GDFT using BSS achieves the same outcomes at a lower cost and without the risk of bleeding.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7771,"journal":{"name":"American journal of surgery","volume":"245 ","pages":"Article 116355"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002961025001771","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) improves postoperative outcomes in various surgeries, but the optimal fluid choice between balanced salt solutions (BSS) and hydroxyethyl starch (HES) remains debated. This meta-analysis compared postoperative outcomes of GDFT using BSS versus 6 ​% HES in elective major abdominal surgery. Comprehensive database searches identified eight RCTs (1739 patients) published between 2000 and 2024. No significant differences were found in overall postoperative complications [RR 1.04 (95 ​% CI 0.90–1.20); p ​= ​0.59], including renal, cardiovascular, respiratory complications, or mortality. However, BSS required significantly higher intraoperative fluid volumes [SMD 0.61 (95 ​% CI 0.42–0.80); p ​< ​0.001] and led to greater postoperative fluid balance [SMD 0.39 (95 ​% CI 0.20–0.59); p ​< ​0.001]. 6 ​% HES should not be used routinely. GDFT using BSS achieves the same outcomes at a lower cost and without the risk of bleeding.
对比平衡盐溶液和6%羟乙基淀粉在腹部大外科目标导向治疗中的应用:一项系统综述和荟萃分析
目标导向液体疗法(GDFT)可改善各种手术的术后效果,但平衡盐溶液(BSS)和羟乙基淀粉(HES)之间的最佳液体选择仍存在争议。这项荟萃分析比较了在择期大腹部手术中使用 BSS 和 6% HES 进行 GDFT 的术后效果。通过全面的数据库搜索,发现了 2000 年至 2024 年间发表的 8 项 RCT(1739 名患者)。在总体术后并发症方面未发现明显差异[RR 1.04 (95 % CI 0.90-1.20); p = 0.59],包括肾脏、心血管、呼吸系统并发症或死亡率。然而,BSS 所需的术中液体量明显更高[SMD 0.61 (95 % CI 0.42-0.80); p <0.001],并导致更大的术后液体平衡[SMD 0.39 (95 % CI 0.20-0.59); p <0.001]。不应常规使用 6% HES。使用 BSS 的 GDFT 能以较低的成本实现相同的效果,且无出血风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
570
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Surgery® is a peer-reviewed journal designed for the general surgeon who performs abdominal, cancer, vascular, head and neck, breast, colorectal, and other forms of surgery. AJS is the official journal of 7 major surgical societies* and publishes their official papers as well as independently submitted clinical studies, editorials, reviews, brief reports, correspondence and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信