De-prescribing opioids among Medicaid patients with long-term opioid use

0 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Sarah A. Friedman , Paul Snyder , Denis Patterson , Sarah Y.T. Hartzell , Michelle S. Keller
{"title":"De-prescribing opioids among Medicaid patients with long-term opioid use","authors":"Sarah A. Friedman ,&nbsp;Paul Snyder ,&nbsp;Denis Patterson ,&nbsp;Sarah Y.T. Hartzell ,&nbsp;Michelle S. Keller","doi":"10.1016/j.josat.2025.209695","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Guidelines encourage deprescribing opioids for long-term opioid patients, especially those using opioids and benzodiazepines, z-drugs, or muscle relaxants (“other respiratory depressants”).</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Were long-term opioid patients who were prescribed other respiratory depressants more likely to have deprescribing opioid trajectories?</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Cross-sectional retrospective study using pharmacy and professional claims from 2015 to 2019. Adjusted logistic regression models were stratified on low (&lt;50 morphine milligram equivalents; MME) and high (&gt;50 MME) starting opioid doses. We reported predicted probabilities with 95 % confidence intervals.</div></div><div><h3>Subjects</h3><div>Nevada and Colorado Medicaid beneficiaries 18–64 years old without cancer diagnoses with long-term (120 days' supply/6 months) opioid use (117,400 person-windows).</div></div><div><h3>Measures</h3><div>We used group-based trajectory modeling in Stata to identify characteristic 12-month dosing trajectories. Using the resulting trajectories, we assigned the outcome = 1 if the observation had a deprescribing trajectory (versus a constant trajectory). Binary exposure variables indicated that the patient had an opioid prescription overlapping with 1, 2, or 3 types of other respiratory depressants.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among patients with a low starting opioid dose, the predicted probabilities of a deprescribing trajectory were lower when the patient had overlapping other respiratory depressants compared to when they did not (0 respiratory depressants: 0.33, [0.32, 0.33]; vs. 1 respiratory depressant: 0.22, [0.20, 0.23]; 2 respiratory depressants: 0.18 [0.16, 0.20]; 3 respiratory depressants:0.20 [0.13, 0.27]). Among patients with a high starting opioid dose, we observed similar results.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions and relevance</h3><div>Targeted provider-level interventions to support deprescribing for long-term opioid patients using opioids and other respiratory depressants may provide particularly high-value care.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73960,"journal":{"name":"Journal of substance use and addiction treatment","volume":"174 ","pages":"Article 209695"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of substance use and addiction treatment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949875925000748","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Guidelines encourage deprescribing opioids for long-term opioid patients, especially those using opioids and benzodiazepines, z-drugs, or muscle relaxants (“other respiratory depressants”).

Objective

Were long-term opioid patients who were prescribed other respiratory depressants more likely to have deprescribing opioid trajectories?

Design

Cross-sectional retrospective study using pharmacy and professional claims from 2015 to 2019. Adjusted logistic regression models were stratified on low (<50 morphine milligram equivalents; MME) and high (>50 MME) starting opioid doses. We reported predicted probabilities with 95 % confidence intervals.

Subjects

Nevada and Colorado Medicaid beneficiaries 18–64 years old without cancer diagnoses with long-term (120 days' supply/6 months) opioid use (117,400 person-windows).

Measures

We used group-based trajectory modeling in Stata to identify characteristic 12-month dosing trajectories. Using the resulting trajectories, we assigned the outcome = 1 if the observation had a deprescribing trajectory (versus a constant trajectory). Binary exposure variables indicated that the patient had an opioid prescription overlapping with 1, 2, or 3 types of other respiratory depressants.

Results

Among patients with a low starting opioid dose, the predicted probabilities of a deprescribing trajectory were lower when the patient had overlapping other respiratory depressants compared to when they did not (0 respiratory depressants: 0.33, [0.32, 0.33]; vs. 1 respiratory depressant: 0.22, [0.20, 0.23]; 2 respiratory depressants: 0.18 [0.16, 0.20]; 3 respiratory depressants:0.20 [0.13, 0.27]). Among patients with a high starting opioid dose, we observed similar results.

Conclusions and relevance

Targeted provider-level interventions to support deprescribing for long-term opioid patients using opioids and other respiratory depressants may provide particularly high-value care.
在长期使用阿片类药物的医疗补助患者中减少阿片类药物的处方
指南鼓励长期服用阿片类药物的患者减少阿片类药物的处方,特别是那些使用阿片类药物和苯二氮卓类药物、z-药物或肌肉松弛剂(“其他呼吸抑制剂”)的患者。长期服用阿片类药物的患者服用其他呼吸抑制剂是否更有可能出现阿片类药物的解药轨迹?设计利用2015 - 2019年的药学和职业索赔进行横断面回顾性研究。调整后的逻辑回归模型按低(50吗啡毫克当量;MME)和高起始阿片类药物剂量(50 MME)。我们以95%的置信区间报告预测概率。受试者:内华达州和科罗拉多州医疗补助受益人,18-64岁,无癌症诊断,长期使用阿片类药物(120天/6个月)(117,400人)。我们在Stata中使用基于组的轨迹建模来确定特征的12个月给药轨迹。使用得到的轨迹,如果观察结果具有描述性轨迹(相对于恒定轨迹),我们将结果赋值为1。二元暴露变量表明患者的阿片类药物处方与1、2或3种其他呼吸抑制剂重叠。结果在低起始阿片类药物剂量的患者中,当患者重叠使用其他呼吸抑制剂时,预测处方轨迹的概率低于没有重叠使用其他呼吸抑制剂的患者(0呼吸抑制剂:0.33,[0.32,0.33];1种呼吸抑制剂:0.22,[0.20,0.23];2种呼吸抑制剂:0.18 [0.16,0.20];3种呼吸抑制剂:0.20[0.13,0.27])。在高起始阿片类药物剂量的患者中,我们观察到类似的结果。结论及相关性:针对长期使用阿片类药物和其他呼吸抑制剂的阿片类药物患者,有针对性的提供者干预措施可能会提供特别高价值的护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of substance use and addiction treatment
Journal of substance use and addiction treatment Biological Psychiatry, Neuroscience (General), Psychiatry and Mental Health, Psychology (General)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信