Experimental investigation on interfacial area concentration in narrow-channel steam-water flow based on printed circuit sensor

IF 1.9 3区 工程技术 Q1 NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Yiang Yang, Jinbiao Xiong
{"title":"Experimental investigation on interfacial area concentration in narrow-channel steam-water flow based on printed circuit sensor","authors":"Yiang Yang,&nbsp;Jinbiao Xiong","doi":"10.1016/j.nucengdes.2025.114091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Due to deficiency of void fraction measurement of steam-water flow in narrow channels, existing interfacial area concentration (IAC) models for narrow channels have mostly been developed based on air–water flow. The applicability of these models to steam-water flow remains uncertain. To address this deficiency, a ceramic-substrate printed circuit (CSPC) sensor is utilized to obtain the instantaneous interface topology of steam-water flow in a narrow rectangular channel. Experiments were conducted under pressures ranging from 0.2 to 0.9 MPa, covering flow patterns from bubbly to annular flow. The average bubble shape, projected interfacial area concentration (PIAC), and projected interfacial length concentration (PILC) for bubbles of different sizes were comprehensively analyzed. The critical diameter separating distorted and cap bubbles, as utilized in existing IAC models, was verified from a statistical averaging perspective. Within the experimental conditions, PIAC and PILC showed no significant variation under different pressures. The case-averaged PIAC and PILC of steam-water flow and air–water flow exhibited good agreement within the same channel geometry, although some divergence was observed for bubbles of different sizes. Among the existing IAC correlations, the Yang-Xiong model demonstrated the best performance in predicting IAC compared to the present experimental data. The relative error of the total IAC was within ± 10 % for most cases and decreased with increasing void fraction.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19170,"journal":{"name":"Nuclear Engineering and Design","volume":"439 ","pages":"Article 114091"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nuclear Engineering and Design","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0029549325002687","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Due to deficiency of void fraction measurement of steam-water flow in narrow channels, existing interfacial area concentration (IAC) models for narrow channels have mostly been developed based on air–water flow. The applicability of these models to steam-water flow remains uncertain. To address this deficiency, a ceramic-substrate printed circuit (CSPC) sensor is utilized to obtain the instantaneous interface topology of steam-water flow in a narrow rectangular channel. Experiments were conducted under pressures ranging from 0.2 to 0.9 MPa, covering flow patterns from bubbly to annular flow. The average bubble shape, projected interfacial area concentration (PIAC), and projected interfacial length concentration (PILC) for bubbles of different sizes were comprehensively analyzed. The critical diameter separating distorted and cap bubbles, as utilized in existing IAC models, was verified from a statistical averaging perspective. Within the experimental conditions, PIAC and PILC showed no significant variation under different pressures. The case-averaged PIAC and PILC of steam-water flow and air–water flow exhibited good agreement within the same channel geometry, although some divergence was observed for bubbles of different sizes. Among the existing IAC correlations, the Yang-Xiong model demonstrated the best performance in predicting IAC compared to the present experimental data. The relative error of the total IAC was within ± 10 % for most cases and decreased with increasing void fraction.
基于印刷电路传感器的窄通道蒸汽-水流动界面面积浓度实验研究
由于缺乏对窄通道中蒸汽-水流动的孔隙率测量,现有的窄通道界面面积浓度(IAC)模型大多是基于空气-水流动建立的。这些模型对蒸汽-水流动的适用性仍不确定。为了解决这一缺陷,利用陶瓷基板印刷电路(CSPC)传感器获得了窄矩形通道中蒸汽-水流动的瞬时界面拓扑结构。实验在0.2 - 0.9 MPa的压力范围内进行,涵盖了从气泡流到环空流的流动模式。综合分析了不同尺寸气泡的平均气泡形状、投影界面面积浓度(PIAC)和投影界面长度浓度(PILC)。从统计平均的角度验证了现有IAC模型中使用的分离畸变气泡和帽泡的临界直径。在实验条件下,不同压力下PIAC和PILC变化不显著。蒸汽-水流动和空气-水流动的实例平均PIAC和PILC在相同的通道几何形状下表现出很好的一致性,尽管在不同尺寸的气泡中观察到一些差异。在已有的IAC相关性中,与现有的实验数据相比,Yang-Xiong模型在预测IAC方面表现出最好的性能。大多数情况下,总IAC的相对误差在±10%以内,随空隙率的增加而减小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nuclear Engineering and Design
Nuclear Engineering and Design 工程技术-核科学技术
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
11.80%
发文量
377
审稿时长
5 months
期刊介绍: Nuclear Engineering and Design covers the wide range of disciplines involved in the engineering, design, safety and construction of nuclear fission reactors. The Editors welcome papers both on applied and innovative aspects and developments in nuclear science and technology. Fundamentals of Reactor Design include: • Thermal-Hydraulics and Core Physics • Safety Analysis, Risk Assessment (PSA) • Structural and Mechanical Engineering • Materials Science • Fuel Behavior and Design • Structural Plant Design • Engineering of Reactor Components • Experiments Aspects beyond fundamentals of Reactor Design covered: • Accident Mitigation Measures • Reactor Control Systems • Licensing Issues • Safeguard Engineering • Economy of Plants • Reprocessing / Waste Disposal • Applications of Nuclear Energy • Maintenance • Decommissioning Papers on new reactor ideas and developments (Generation IV reactors) such as inherently safe modular HTRs, High Performance LWRs/HWRs and LMFBs/GFR will be considered; Actinide Burners, Accelerator Driven Systems, Energy Amplifiers and other special designs of power and research reactors and their applications are also encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信