{"title":"Role of Biomarkers in Diagnosing Disease, Assessing the Severity and Progression of Disease, and Evaluating the Efficacy of Therapies","authors":"Raphael Schiffmann","doi":"10.1002/jimd.70034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper reviews biomarkers in lysosomal disease according to their categories and definitions. There are numerous biomarkers in lysosomal diseases. Some are disease or organ-specific, but most are not. Organ-specific biomarkers are especially useful, but most biomarkers help with diagnosis, assessing disease severity, prognosis, and pharmacodynamic response. There are as yet no truly validated biomarkers in lysosomal diseases by the Prentice, Fleming, and DeMets criteria. None so far can serve as surrogate endpoints in clinical trials, or as substitutes for clinically meaningful endpoints that evaluate how patients feel, function, or survive. The US Food and Drug Administration has thus far used surrogate biomarkers to license therapy only for 3 lysosomal diseases—Gaucher disease, Fabry disease, and lysosomal lipase deficiency. The paucity of surrogate biomarkers reflects success in using clinically important endpoints for the licensing of therapies for Pompe disease, mucopolysaccharidosis IVA, VI, and VII, Niemann-Pick type C, and CLN2. In conclusion, biomarkers in lysosomal diseases are best used for diagnosis, patient categorization, pharmacodynamic response, and sometimes for patient prognosis and risk. Thus far, they have been less useful as surrogate biomarkers in pivotal clinical trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":16281,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease","volume":"48 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jimd.70034","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jimd.70034","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This paper reviews biomarkers in lysosomal disease according to their categories and definitions. There are numerous biomarkers in lysosomal diseases. Some are disease or organ-specific, but most are not. Organ-specific biomarkers are especially useful, but most biomarkers help with diagnosis, assessing disease severity, prognosis, and pharmacodynamic response. There are as yet no truly validated biomarkers in lysosomal diseases by the Prentice, Fleming, and DeMets criteria. None so far can serve as surrogate endpoints in clinical trials, or as substitutes for clinically meaningful endpoints that evaluate how patients feel, function, or survive. The US Food and Drug Administration has thus far used surrogate biomarkers to license therapy only for 3 lysosomal diseases—Gaucher disease, Fabry disease, and lysosomal lipase deficiency. The paucity of surrogate biomarkers reflects success in using clinically important endpoints for the licensing of therapies for Pompe disease, mucopolysaccharidosis IVA, VI, and VII, Niemann-Pick type C, and CLN2. In conclusion, biomarkers in lysosomal diseases are best used for diagnosis, patient categorization, pharmacodynamic response, and sometimes for patient prognosis and risk. Thus far, they have been less useful as surrogate biomarkers in pivotal clinical trials.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease (JIMD) is the official journal of the Society for the Study of Inborn Errors of Metabolism (SSIEM). By enhancing communication between workers in the field throughout the world, the JIMD aims to improve the management and understanding of inherited metabolic disorders. It publishes results of original research and new or important observations pertaining to any aspect of inherited metabolic disease in humans and higher animals. This includes clinical (medical, dental and veterinary), biochemical, genetic (including cytogenetic, molecular and population genetic), experimental (including cell biological), methodological, theoretical, epidemiological, ethical and counselling aspects. The JIMD also reviews important new developments or controversial issues relating to metabolic disorders and publishes reviews and short reports arising from the Society''s annual symposia. A distinction is made between peer-reviewed scientific material that is selected because of its significance for other professionals in the field and non-peer- reviewed material that aims to be important, controversial, interesting or entertaining (“Extras”).