Magnetization of Iron Meteorites up to the Meter in Size as Possible Analogs for Asteroid Psyche

IF 3.9 1区 地球科学 Q1 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
Clara Maurel, Elise Clavé, Jérôme Gattacecca, Minoru Uehara, Elias N. Mansbach, Timothy J. McCoy, Benjamin P. Weiss
{"title":"Magnetization of Iron Meteorites up to the Meter in Size as Possible Analogs for Asteroid Psyche","authors":"Clara Maurel,&nbsp;Elise Clavé,&nbsp;Jérôme Gattacecca,&nbsp;Minoru Uehara,&nbsp;Elias N. Mansbach,&nbsp;Timothy J. McCoy,&nbsp;Benjamin P. Weiss","doi":"10.1029/2024JE008810","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Meteorite paleomagnetic studies indicate planetesimal generated magnetic fields, but spacecraft magnetic measurements have yet to identify asteroidal natural remanent magnetization (NRM). This apparent discrepancy is of particular interest in the context of the NASA Psyche mission, which will search for evidence of past magnetic activity of the metal-rich asteroid (16) Psyche. Here, we aim to test whether the NRM of meteorites inevitably drops below detectable values as specimen size increases, which could explain why asteroidal NRMs could never be detected. We focus on iron meteorites as possible analogs to (16) Psyche's constituent material. To do so, we measure the remanent magnetic field and estimate the NRM of samples of four iron meteorites with volumes between mm<sup>3</sup> and m<sup>3</sup>. We find that their estimated NRMs decrease with increasing sample size but appear to plateau. These data are compatible with the idea that the bulk NRM of increasingly large objects becomes dominated by the fraction of this NRM produced by assemblages of magnetic minerals sharing a common magnetization direction. Moreover, all m<sup>3</sup>-sized meteorites carry NRMs that are two orders of magnitude above the detectability limit of the Psyche Magnetometer, three of which are possibly pre-terrestrial. These data, acquired on some of the largest masses of iron meteorites available on Earth, support the range of plausible NRM values for km-size regions of (16) Psyche, used to establish the spacecraft Magnetometer's performance requirements. Nevertheless, large-scale events such as brecciation of the asteroid following magnetization acquisition could always lower the asteroid's NRM below the detectability limit.</p>","PeriodicalId":16101,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets","volume":"130 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024JE008810","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024JE008810","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Meteorite paleomagnetic studies indicate planetesimal generated magnetic fields, but spacecraft magnetic measurements have yet to identify asteroidal natural remanent magnetization (NRM). This apparent discrepancy is of particular interest in the context of the NASA Psyche mission, which will search for evidence of past magnetic activity of the metal-rich asteroid (16) Psyche. Here, we aim to test whether the NRM of meteorites inevitably drops below detectable values as specimen size increases, which could explain why asteroidal NRMs could never be detected. We focus on iron meteorites as possible analogs to (16) Psyche's constituent material. To do so, we measure the remanent magnetic field and estimate the NRM of samples of four iron meteorites with volumes between mm3 and m3. We find that their estimated NRMs decrease with increasing sample size but appear to plateau. These data are compatible with the idea that the bulk NRM of increasingly large objects becomes dominated by the fraction of this NRM produced by assemblages of magnetic minerals sharing a common magnetization direction. Moreover, all m3-sized meteorites carry NRMs that are two orders of magnitude above the detectability limit of the Psyche Magnetometer, three of which are possibly pre-terrestrial. These data, acquired on some of the largest masses of iron meteorites available on Earth, support the range of plausible NRM values for km-size regions of (16) Psyche, used to establish the spacecraft Magnetometer's performance requirements. Nevertheless, large-scale events such as brecciation of the asteroid following magnetization acquisition could always lower the asteroid's NRM below the detectability limit.

Abstract Image

磁化到米大小的铁陨石可能与普赛克小行星类似
陨石的古地磁研究表明小行星产生的磁场,但航天器的磁测量尚未确定小行星的自然剩余磁化(NRM)。这种明显的差异在美国宇航局的普赛克任务中引起了特别的兴趣,该任务将寻找富含金属的小行星普赛克过去磁场活动的证据。在这里,我们的目标是测试陨石的NRM是否不可避免地随着样品尺寸的增加而下降到可检测值以下,这可以解释为什么小行星的NRM永远无法被检测到。我们把重点放在铁陨石上,因为它可能与普赛克的构成物质类似。为此,我们测量了四颗体积在mm3和m3之间的铁陨石样本的剩余磁场并估计了NRM。我们发现他们估计的nrm随着样本量的增加而减少,但出现平台。这些数据与这样一种观点是一致的,即体积越来越大的物体的NRM被具有共同磁化方向的磁性矿物组合产生的NRM的部分所支配。此外,所有m3大小的陨石携带的nrm都比普赛克磁力计的探测极限高出两个数量级,其中三个可能是在地球之前形成的。这些数据是在地球上一些最大质量的铁陨石上获得的,支持了普赛克(16)公里大小区域的合理NRM值范围,用于建立航天器磁力计的性能要求。然而,大规模的事件,如小行星在获得磁化后的角化,总是会将小行星的NRM降低到可探测极限以下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets
Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets Earth and Planetary Sciences-Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
27.10%
发文量
254
期刊介绍: The Journal of Geophysical Research Planets is dedicated to the publication of new and original research in the broad field of planetary science. Manuscripts concerning planetary geology, geophysics, geochemistry, atmospheres, and dynamics are appropriate for the journal when they increase knowledge about the processes that affect Solar System objects. Manuscripts concerning other planetary systems, exoplanets or Earth are welcome when presented in a comparative planetology perspective. Studies in the field of astrobiology will be considered when they have immediate consequences for the interpretation of planetary data. JGR: Planets does not publish manuscripts that deal with future missions and instrumentation, nor those that are primarily of an engineering interest. Instrument, calibration or data processing papers may be appropriate for the journal, but only when accompanied by scientific analysis and interpretation that increases understanding of the studied object. A manuscript that describes a new method or technique would be acceptable for JGR: Planets if it contained new and relevant scientific results obtained using the method. Review articles are generally not appropriate for JGR: Planets, but they may be considered if they form an integral part of a special issue.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信