Predictive Modeling of Glycemic Indices of Value-Added Coconut (Cocos nucifera L) Jaggery Enriched with Specific Ingredients

IF 1.8 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY
H. P. D. T. Hewa Pathirana, I. Wijesekara, L. L. W. C. Yalegama, M. A. Jayasinghe, K. P. Waidyarathne, C. N. Hitigedera
{"title":"Predictive Modeling of Glycemic Indices of Value-Added Coconut (Cocos nucifera L) Jaggery Enriched with Specific Ingredients","authors":"H. P. D. T. Hewa Pathirana,&nbsp;I. Wijesekara,&nbsp;L. L. W. C. Yalegama,&nbsp;M. A. Jayasinghe,&nbsp;K. P. Waidyarathne,&nbsp;C. N. Hitigedera","doi":"10.1007/s12355-025-01535-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Coconut (<i>Cocos nucifera</i> L) jaggery is an alternative sweetener, especially among rural Asian communities. The focus of this study is the evaluation of <i>in vitro</i> digestibility and prediction of glycemic index (PGI) for four types of coconut jaggery; jaggery produced from traditional sap collection method using hal bark (<i>Vateria capalifera</i>) (HAL Jaggery), the jaggery prepared from pure sap collected from a novel sap collection device (NSCM Jaggery), jaggery from collected sap through a novel sap collection method with 0.2% cinnamon (<i>Cinnamomum zeylanicum)</i> (CIN Jaggery) and the jaggery value added with 0.05% of nutmeg (<i>Myristica fragrans)</i> (NUT Jaggery). Digestion and digestibility tests for each type of sweetener were done with cane sugar as a comparison. Results revealed that four types of jaggery have different hydrolysis rates from 30 to 180 min. The hydrolysis index (HI) of cane sugar was significantly higher than that of the others (55 ± 0.023%), whereas the lowest HI was observed in NUT Jaggery (32 ± 0.014%). According to the <i>in vitro</i> glycemic prediction, all four types of coconut jaggery samples were categorized under a medium GI sweetener, while cane sugar was categorized as a high GI (69.91 ± 0.02) sweetener.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":781,"journal":{"name":"Sugar Tech","volume":"27 3","pages":"765 - 770"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sugar Tech","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12355-025-01535-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Coconut (Cocos nucifera L) jaggery is an alternative sweetener, especially among rural Asian communities. The focus of this study is the evaluation of in vitro digestibility and prediction of glycemic index (PGI) for four types of coconut jaggery; jaggery produced from traditional sap collection method using hal bark (Vateria capalifera) (HAL Jaggery), the jaggery prepared from pure sap collected from a novel sap collection device (NSCM Jaggery), jaggery from collected sap through a novel sap collection method with 0.2% cinnamon (Cinnamomum zeylanicum) (CIN Jaggery) and the jaggery value added with 0.05% of nutmeg (Myristica fragrans) (NUT Jaggery). Digestion and digestibility tests for each type of sweetener were done with cane sugar as a comparison. Results revealed that four types of jaggery have different hydrolysis rates from 30 to 180 min. The hydrolysis index (HI) of cane sugar was significantly higher than that of the others (55 ± 0.023%), whereas the lowest HI was observed in NUT Jaggery (32 ± 0.014%). According to the in vitro glycemic prediction, all four types of coconut jaggery samples were categorized under a medium GI sweetener, while cane sugar was categorized as a high GI (69.91 ± 0.02) sweetener.

富含特定成分的增值椰子(Cocos nucifera L)琼脂的血糖生成指数预测模型
椰子(Cocos nucifera L)琼脂是一种替代甜味剂,尤其是在亚洲农村社区。本研究的重点是评估四种椰子琼脂的体外消化率和预测血糖生成指数(PGI);使用哈拉树皮(Vateria capalifera)的传统树液收集法生产的琼脂(HAL Jaggery)、从新型树液收集装置收集的纯树液中制备的琼脂(NSCM Jaggery)、通过新型树液收集法收集的树液中添加 0.2% 的肉桂(Cinnamomum zeylanicum)制成的琼脂(CIN Jaggery),以及添加 0.05% 的肉豆蔻(Myristica fragrans)制成的琼脂(NUT Jaggery)。每种甜味剂的消化和消化率测试都与蔗糖进行了比较。结果显示,四种琼脂在 30 至 180 分钟内的水解率各不相同。蔗糖的水解指数(HI)明显高于其他种类(55 ± 0.023%),而坚果琼脂的水解指数最低(32 ± 0.014%)。根据体外血糖预测,所有四种椰子琼脂样品都被归类为中等 GI 甜味剂,而蔗糖被归类为高 GI(69.91 ± 0.02)甜味剂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sugar Tech
Sugar Tech AGRONOMY-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
21.10%
发文量
145
期刊介绍: The journal Sugar Tech is planned with every aim and objectives to provide a high-profile and updated research publications, comments and reviews on the most innovative, original and rigorous development in agriculture technologies for better crop improvement and production of sugar crops (sugarcane, sugar beet, sweet sorghum, Stevia, palm sugar, etc), sugar processing, bioethanol production, bioenergy, value addition and by-products. Inter-disciplinary studies of fundamental problems on the subjects are also given high priority. Thus, in addition to its full length and short papers on original research, the journal also covers regular feature articles, reviews, comments, scientific correspondence, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信