Knowledge graph exploitation to enhance the usability of risk assessment in construction safety planning

IF 8 1区 工程技术 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
K.W. Johansen , C. Schultz , J. Teizer
{"title":"Knowledge graph exploitation to enhance the usability of risk assessment in construction safety planning","authors":"K.W. Johansen ,&nbsp;C. Schultz ,&nbsp;J. Teizer","doi":"10.1016/j.aei.2025.103305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Construction projects and their dynamic and yet hazardous work environments face significant challenges. Despite advancements, many proposed solutions for information extraction and utilization remain impractical due to complexity and lack of interoperability. Information is often siloed in proprietary formats, making it difficult to integrate. This issue is evident in the construction safety domain, where advanced risk analysis tools provide detailed insights to hazards but can be overwhelming. Similar challenges exist in cost estimation, schedule evaluation, progress monitoring, and quality compliance checking. Decision-making in construction scheduling struggles to assess how changes impact site safety due to insufficient information and knowledge extraction capabilities, especially when it comes to cross-domain knowledge extraction. This study aims to make safety information accessible to safety and planning professionals. By leveraging Digital Twins, automated safety analysis, and knowledge representation, we enable decision-makers to gain deeper insights into their domain and understand the interplay between project planning and safety. We propose a framework for knowledge extraction, an ontology for capturing knowledge, and query building blocks to transform natural language questions into actionable queries. These methods are tested in a case study, revealing valuable insights into the cross-domain impact of decisions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50941,"journal":{"name":"Advanced Engineering Informatics","volume":"65 ","pages":"Article 103305"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advanced Engineering Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1474034625001983","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Construction projects and their dynamic and yet hazardous work environments face significant challenges. Despite advancements, many proposed solutions for information extraction and utilization remain impractical due to complexity and lack of interoperability. Information is often siloed in proprietary formats, making it difficult to integrate. This issue is evident in the construction safety domain, where advanced risk analysis tools provide detailed insights to hazards but can be overwhelming. Similar challenges exist in cost estimation, schedule evaluation, progress monitoring, and quality compliance checking. Decision-making in construction scheduling struggles to assess how changes impact site safety due to insufficient information and knowledge extraction capabilities, especially when it comes to cross-domain knowledge extraction. This study aims to make safety information accessible to safety and planning professionals. By leveraging Digital Twins, automated safety analysis, and knowledge representation, we enable decision-makers to gain deeper insights into their domain and understand the interplay between project planning and safety. We propose a framework for knowledge extraction, an ontology for capturing knowledge, and query building blocks to transform natural language questions into actionable queries. These methods are tested in a case study, revealing valuable insights into the cross-domain impact of decisions.

Abstract Image

利用知识图谱提高建筑安全规划风险评估的可用性
建筑项目及其动态但危险的工作环境面临着重大挑战。尽管取得了进步,但由于复杂性和缺乏互操作性,许多提出的信息提取和利用解决方案仍然不切实际。信息通常以专有格式孤立存在,使其难以集成。这个问题在建筑安全领域很明显,先进的风险分析工具提供了对危险的详细见解,但可能是压倒性的。类似的挑战也存在于成本估算、进度评估、进度监控和质量遵从性检查中。由于信息和知识提取能力的不足,特别是在涉及跨领域知识提取时,施工计划的决策很难评估变化对现场安全的影响。这项研究的目的是使安全和规划专业人员能够获得安全信息。通过利用数字孪生、自动化安全分析和知识表示,我们使决策者能够更深入地了解他们的领域,并了解项目计划和安全之间的相互作用。我们提出了一个知识抽取框架,一个知识捕获本体,以及将自然语言问题转换为可操作查询的查询构建块。这些方法在案例研究中进行了测试,揭示了对决策跨领域影响的有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advanced Engineering Informatics
Advanced Engineering Informatics 工程技术-工程:综合
CiteScore
12.40
自引率
18.20%
发文量
292
审稿时长
45 days
期刊介绍: Advanced Engineering Informatics is an international Journal that solicits research papers with an emphasis on 'knowledge' and 'engineering applications'. The Journal seeks original papers that report progress in applying methods of engineering informatics. These papers should have engineering relevance and help provide a scientific base for more reliable, spontaneous, and creative engineering decision-making. Additionally, papers should demonstrate the science of supporting knowledge-intensive engineering tasks and validate the generality, power, and scalability of new methods through rigorous evaluation, preferably both qualitatively and quantitatively. Abstracting and indexing for Advanced Engineering Informatics include Science Citation Index Expanded, Scopus and INSPEC.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信