Pilates lessens pain and disability and improves quality of life in people with musculoskeletal conditions in the extremities: A systematic review

IF 4.6 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Talia Barnet-Hepples , Anita Barros Amorim , Clebeson de Azeyêdo Nogueira , Maria Clara Silva de Melo , Amabile Borges Dario , Penelope Latey , Sâmara Raquel Alves Gomes , Liane de Brito Macedo
{"title":"Pilates lessens pain and disability and improves quality of life in people with musculoskeletal conditions in the extremities: A systematic review","authors":"Talia Barnet-Hepples ,&nbsp;Anita Barros Amorim ,&nbsp;Clebeson de Azeyêdo Nogueira ,&nbsp;Maria Clara Silva de Melo ,&nbsp;Amabile Borges Dario ,&nbsp;Penelope Latey ,&nbsp;Sâmara Raquel Alves Gomes ,&nbsp;Liane de Brito Macedo","doi":"10.1016/j.rehab.2025.101973","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Pilates has gained popularity for its benefits in reducing pain and disability among people with low back pain. However, conflicting evidence exists regarding its efficacy for musculoskeletal conditions in the upper and lower limbs.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Investigate the effect of Pilates on pain, disability, quality of life, and physical function in people with musculoskeletal conditions in the extremities.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A systematic review and meta-analysis of experimental studies using Pilates for musculoskeletal conditions in the extremities. Our outcomes included pain, disability, quality of life, and physical function. We searched eleven databases from inception to December 2023. Evidence was synthesised as standardised mean differences (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) using random-effects models. Risk of bias was assessed using the Revised Cochrane risk of bias tool or the ROBINS-I tool. GRADE was used to determine evidence certainty.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Eleven studies (<em>n</em> = 444) were included. Studies had moderate to high risk of bias. Pilates lessened pain (5 studies; SMD 1.41, 95% CI, 0.54–2.28), and disability (5 studies; SMD 0.83, 95% CI, 0.15–1.50), and improved quality of life (2 studies; SMD 2.10, 95% CI, 0.34–3.86) compared to the control group. The effect of Pilates on strength compared to the control the group was estimated to be small (3 studies; SMD 0.35), with unclear true effect due to uncertainty (95% CI, -0.27-0.98). The effects of Pilates on further aspects of physical function, including balance, proprioception, and range of motion remain unclear due to a lack of data which prevented meta-analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Pilates was found to lessen pain and disability and improve quality of life in people with musculoskeletal conditions in the extremities compared to control. However, this evidence is of a very low certainty. The effect of Pilates on physical function remains uncertain. The evidence supporting the superiority of Pilates over other exercise interventions is inconclusive.</div></div><div><h3>Review Registration</h3><div>PROSPERO (CRD42022375925).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56030,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine","volume":"68 6","pages":"Article 101973"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877065725000387","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Pilates has gained popularity for its benefits in reducing pain and disability among people with low back pain. However, conflicting evidence exists regarding its efficacy for musculoskeletal conditions in the upper and lower limbs.

Objectives

Investigate the effect of Pilates on pain, disability, quality of life, and physical function in people with musculoskeletal conditions in the extremities.

Methods

A systematic review and meta-analysis of experimental studies using Pilates for musculoskeletal conditions in the extremities. Our outcomes included pain, disability, quality of life, and physical function. We searched eleven databases from inception to December 2023. Evidence was synthesised as standardised mean differences (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) using random-effects models. Risk of bias was assessed using the Revised Cochrane risk of bias tool or the ROBINS-I tool. GRADE was used to determine evidence certainty.

Results

Eleven studies (n = 444) were included. Studies had moderate to high risk of bias. Pilates lessened pain (5 studies; SMD 1.41, 95% CI, 0.54–2.28), and disability (5 studies; SMD 0.83, 95% CI, 0.15–1.50), and improved quality of life (2 studies; SMD 2.10, 95% CI, 0.34–3.86) compared to the control group. The effect of Pilates on strength compared to the control the group was estimated to be small (3 studies; SMD 0.35), with unclear true effect due to uncertainty (95% CI, -0.27-0.98). The effects of Pilates on further aspects of physical function, including balance, proprioception, and range of motion remain unclear due to a lack of data which prevented meta-analysis.

Conclusion

Pilates was found to lessen pain and disability and improve quality of life in people with musculoskeletal conditions in the extremities compared to control. However, this evidence is of a very low certainty. The effect of Pilates on physical function remains uncertain. The evidence supporting the superiority of Pilates over other exercise interventions is inconclusive.

Review Registration

PROSPERO (CRD42022375925).
普拉提减轻疼痛和残疾,提高生活质量的人与肌肉骨骼条件在四肢:一个系统的回顾
背景普拉提因其能减轻腰背痛患者的疼痛和残疾而广受欢迎。目的 调查普拉提对四肢肌肉骨骼疾病患者的疼痛、残疾、生活质量和身体功能的影响。方法 对使用普拉提治疗四肢肌肉骨骼疾病的实验研究进行系统回顾和荟萃分析。研究结果包括疼痛、残疾、生活质量和身体功能。我们检索了从开始到 2023 年 12 月的 11 个数据库。使用随机效应模型将证据综合为标准化平均差 (SMD) 和 95% 置信区间 (CI)。偏倚风险采用修订版 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具或 ROBINS-I 工具进行评估。GRADE 用于确定证据的确定性。研究存在中度至高度偏倚风险。与对照组相比,普拉提可减轻疼痛(5 项研究;SMD 1.41,95% CI,0.54-2.28)和残疾(5 项研究;SMD 0.83,95% CI,0.15-1.50),并提高生活质量(2 项研究;SMD 2.10,95% CI,0.34-3.86)。据估计,与对照组相比,普拉提对力量的影响较小(3 项研究;SMD 0.35),由于不确定性(95% CI,-0.27-0.98),真实效果尚不明确。由于缺乏数据,无法进行荟萃分析,因此普拉提对身体功能的其他方面(包括平衡、本体感觉和活动范围)的影响仍不清楚。结论与对照组相比,普拉提可减轻四肢肌肉骨骼疾病患者的疼痛和残疾,并提高其生活质量。然而,这一证据的确定性很低。普拉提对身体功能的影响仍不确定。支持普拉提优于其他运动干预措施的证据尚无定论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
4.30%
发文量
136
审稿时长
34 days
期刊介绍: Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine covers all areas of Rehabilitation and Physical Medicine; such as: methods of evaluation of motor, sensory, cognitive and visceral impairments; acute and chronic musculoskeletal disorders and pain; disabilities in adult and children ; processes of rehabilitation in orthopaedic, rhumatological, neurological, cardiovascular, pulmonary and urological diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信