Optimizing permeability and porosity prediction with advanced machine learning: A case study unlocking the complexities of late cretaceous reservoirs, gulf of suez, Egypt

IF 2.2 4区 地球科学 Q2 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Amer A. Shehata , Mohamed Ahmed , Ahmed A. Kassem , Ramadan Abdelrehim , Takeshi Tsuji , Amir Ismail
{"title":"Optimizing permeability and porosity prediction with advanced machine learning: A case study unlocking the complexities of late cretaceous reservoirs, gulf of suez, Egypt","authors":"Amer A. Shehata ,&nbsp;Mohamed Ahmed ,&nbsp;Ahmed A. Kassem ,&nbsp;Ramadan Abdelrehim ,&nbsp;Takeshi Tsuji ,&nbsp;Amir Ismail","doi":"10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2025.105670","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Permeability and porosity are critical parameters that influence the evaluation and management of hydrocarbon reservoirs. Conventional permeability and porosity estimation techniques are constrained by data scarcity and geological variability, necessitating advanced predictive models. This study presents a fully automated machine learning (AML) framework that combines four advanced models—Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM), Distributed Random Forest (DRF), Generalized Linear Model (GLM), and Deep Neural Network (DNN)—to predict permeability and porosity based on well log data. The approach integrates twelve well-log responses (i.e. caliper, gamma ray, sonic, density, porosity, water saturation, volume of shale, resistivity) from five wells (inputs), demonstrating enhanced prediction accuracy for permeability and porosity in the Late Cretaceous reservoirs of the Gulf of Suez, Egypt. To ensure robust model training and validation, the dataset was divided into training (60 %), validation (20 %), and testing (20 %) subsets, and model performance was evaluated using Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE), correlation coefficient (r), normalized root mean square error (NRMSE), and bias (B). The DNN model excelled in permeability estimation (testing: NRMSE: 0.57 ± 0.09; NSE: 0.68 ± 0.14; r: 0.82 ± 0.10; B: 9.17), while the DRF model outperformed in predicting porosity (testing: NRMSE: 0.72 ± 0.02; r: 0.69 ± 0.03; NSE: 0.47 ± 0.04; B: 0.93) compared to other models, showcasing superior performance metrics such as Nash-Sutcliff efficiency, correlation coefficients, and normalized root mean square error. The GLM model exhibits the least favorable performance when compared to other ML models. Additionally, this study identifies key well log responses, such as sonic, gamma ray, and deep resistivity logs, as major controlling factors for permeability and porosity predictions, highlighting their nonlinear relationships. The developed AML models provide a cost-efficient, computationally effective, and scalable solution for petrophysical property estimation, enhancing reservoir characterization and enabling broader applications in hydrocarbon exploration and beyond.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14874,"journal":{"name":"Journal of African Earth Sciences","volume":"228 ","pages":"Article 105670"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of African Earth Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1464343X25001372","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Permeability and porosity are critical parameters that influence the evaluation and management of hydrocarbon reservoirs. Conventional permeability and porosity estimation techniques are constrained by data scarcity and geological variability, necessitating advanced predictive models. This study presents a fully automated machine learning (AML) framework that combines four advanced models—Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM), Distributed Random Forest (DRF), Generalized Linear Model (GLM), and Deep Neural Network (DNN)—to predict permeability and porosity based on well log data. The approach integrates twelve well-log responses (i.e. caliper, gamma ray, sonic, density, porosity, water saturation, volume of shale, resistivity) from five wells (inputs), demonstrating enhanced prediction accuracy for permeability and porosity in the Late Cretaceous reservoirs of the Gulf of Suez, Egypt. To ensure robust model training and validation, the dataset was divided into training (60 %), validation (20 %), and testing (20 %) subsets, and model performance was evaluated using Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE), correlation coefficient (r), normalized root mean square error (NRMSE), and bias (B). The DNN model excelled in permeability estimation (testing: NRMSE: 0.57 ± 0.09; NSE: 0.68 ± 0.14; r: 0.82 ± 0.10; B: 9.17), while the DRF model outperformed in predicting porosity (testing: NRMSE: 0.72 ± 0.02; r: 0.69 ± 0.03; NSE: 0.47 ± 0.04; B: 0.93) compared to other models, showcasing superior performance metrics such as Nash-Sutcliff efficiency, correlation coefficients, and normalized root mean square error. The GLM model exhibits the least favorable performance when compared to other ML models. Additionally, this study identifies key well log responses, such as sonic, gamma ray, and deep resistivity logs, as major controlling factors for permeability and porosity predictions, highlighting their nonlinear relationships. The developed AML models provide a cost-efficient, computationally effective, and scalable solution for petrophysical property estimation, enhancing reservoir characterization and enabling broader applications in hydrocarbon exploration and beyond.

Abstract Image

利用先进的机器学习优化渗透率和孔隙度预测:解锁埃及苏伊士湾晚白垩世油藏复杂性的案例研究
渗透率和孔隙度是影响油气藏评估和管理的关键参数。传统的渗透率和孔隙度估算技术受到数据匮乏和地质多变性的制约,因此需要先进的预测模型。本研究提出了一种全自动机器学习(AML)框架,该框架结合了四种先进模型--梯度提升机(GBM)、分布式随机森林(DRF)、广义线性模型(GLM)和深度神经网络(DNN)--根据测井数据预测渗透率和孔隙度。该方法整合了来自五口井(输入)的十二个测井记录响应(即卡尺、伽马射线、声波、密度、孔隙度、水饱和度、页岩体积、电阻率),显示出埃及苏伊士湾晚白垩世储层渗透率和孔隙度预测精度的提高。为确保模型训练和验证的稳健性,数据集被分为训练子集(60%)、验证子集(20%)和测试子集(20%),并使用纳什-苏克里夫效率(NSE)、相关系数(r)、归一化均方根误差(NRMSE)和偏差(B)对模型性能进行了评估。DNN 模型在渗透率估计方面表现出色(测试:NRMSE:0.57 ± 0.09;NSE:0.68 ± 0.14;r:0.82 ± 0.10;B:9.17),而 DRF 模型在预测孔隙度方面表现出色(测试:NRMSE:0.72 ± 0.02;r:0.69 ± 0.03;NSE:0.47 ± 0.04;B:0.93),在纳什-苏特克利夫效率、相关系数和归一化均方根误差等性能指标上均优于其他模型。与其他 ML 模型相比,GLM 模型的性能最差。此外,这项研究还确定了主要的测井反应,如声波、伽马射线和深层电阻率测井,作为渗透率和孔隙度预测的主要控制因素,并强调了它们之间的非线性关系。所开发的 AML 模型为岩石物理特性估算提供了一种成本效益高、计算效率高、可扩展的解决方案,可增强储层特征描述,并在油气勘探及其他领域实现更广泛的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of African Earth Sciences
Journal of African Earth Sciences 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
4.30%
发文量
240
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of African Earth Sciences sees itself as the prime geological journal for all aspects of the Earth Sciences about the African plate. Papers dealing with peripheral areas are welcome if they demonstrate a tight link with Africa. The Journal publishes high quality, peer-reviewed scientific papers. It is devoted primarily to research papers but short communications relating to new developments of broad interest, reviews and book reviews will also be considered. Papers must have international appeal and should present work of more regional than local significance and dealing with well identified and justified scientific questions. Specialised technical papers, analytical or exploration reports must be avoided. Papers on applied geology should preferably be linked to such core disciplines and must be addressed to a more general geoscientific audience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信