Immunomodulation for ARDS

Emma Rademaker MD , Jelle L.G. Haitsma Mulier MD , Julia Drylewicz PhD , Eveline M. Delemarre MD, PhD , Marleen A. Slim MD, PhD , Nicole P. Juffermans MD, PhD , Peter Pickkers MD, PhD , Marc J.M. Bonten MD, PhD , Olaf L. Cremer MD, PhD , Lennie P.G. Derde MD, PhD
{"title":"Immunomodulation for ARDS","authors":"Emma Rademaker MD ,&nbsp;Jelle L.G. Haitsma Mulier MD ,&nbsp;Julia Drylewicz PhD ,&nbsp;Eveline M. Delemarre MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Marleen A. Slim MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Nicole P. Juffermans MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Peter Pickkers MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Marc J.M. Bonten MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Olaf L. Cremer MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Lennie P.G. Derde MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.chstcc.2025.100129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The success of targeted immunomodulation in COVID-19 underscores its potential for ARDS resulting from other causes. However, it is important to understand both its targeted and broader impacts on the inflammatory host response. To guide future ARDS studies, we explored this in patients with COVID-19 using targeted proteomics.</div></div><div><h3>Research Question</h3><div>How do different immune modulators affect the immune profiles of patients who are critically ill with COVID-19-related ARDS?</div></div><div><h3>Study Design and Methods</h3><div>In this multicenter cohort study, we used 2 Dutch biorepositories to compare patients with COVID-19 with acute respiratory failure treated with: no immunotherapy (n = 18), corticosteroids (n = 21), anakinra plus corticosteroids (n = 9), or tocilizumab plus corticosteroids (n = 22). Plasma proteins related to inflammation and cardiovascular injury were measured using proximity extension assays on ICU days 0 through 1, ICU days 2 through 4 (T3), and ICU days 6 through 8 (T7) after treatment initiation.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We observed lower expression of inflammatory biomarkers immediately after tocilizumab administration and from T3 onward after anakinra administration. After treatment with corticosteroids alone, fewer inflammatory biomarkers were suppressed, and only at T3. Multivariate analyses at T3 identified tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand, IL-1 receptor-like 2, and tumor necrosis factor β as markedly increased and proto-oncogene tyrosine-protein kinase (SRC) and serine/threonine kinase 4 (STK4) as decreased, solely after tocilizumab. At T7, lower concentrations of 2,4-dienoyl-CoA reductase 1, signaling lymphocytic activation molecule family member 7, SRC, and STK4 were observed in patients treated with tocilizumab or anakinra, whereas interferon γ, chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 9, and chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 19 were decreased only after anakinra treatment.</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>In this exploratory study, adding tocilizumab or anakinra to corticosteroids triggered a much broader immunoregulatory response than can be explained by their receptor-specific actions. The response after tocilizumab occurred more rapidly than that after anakinra, offering a potential advantage in the time-sensitive ICU setting. Additionally, tocilizumab preserved the interferon pathway, crucial for antiviral defense, whereas anakinra suppressed it.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":93934,"journal":{"name":"CHEST critical care","volume":"3 2","pages":"Article 100129"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CHEST critical care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949788425000024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The success of targeted immunomodulation in COVID-19 underscores its potential for ARDS resulting from other causes. However, it is important to understand both its targeted and broader impacts on the inflammatory host response. To guide future ARDS studies, we explored this in patients with COVID-19 using targeted proteomics.

Research Question

How do different immune modulators affect the immune profiles of patients who are critically ill with COVID-19-related ARDS?

Study Design and Methods

In this multicenter cohort study, we used 2 Dutch biorepositories to compare patients with COVID-19 with acute respiratory failure treated with: no immunotherapy (n = 18), corticosteroids (n = 21), anakinra plus corticosteroids (n = 9), or tocilizumab plus corticosteroids (n = 22). Plasma proteins related to inflammation and cardiovascular injury were measured using proximity extension assays on ICU days 0 through 1, ICU days 2 through 4 (T3), and ICU days 6 through 8 (T7) after treatment initiation.

Results

We observed lower expression of inflammatory biomarkers immediately after tocilizumab administration and from T3 onward after anakinra administration. After treatment with corticosteroids alone, fewer inflammatory biomarkers were suppressed, and only at T3. Multivariate analyses at T3 identified tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand, IL-1 receptor-like 2, and tumor necrosis factor β as markedly increased and proto-oncogene tyrosine-protein kinase (SRC) and serine/threonine kinase 4 (STK4) as decreased, solely after tocilizumab. At T7, lower concentrations of 2,4-dienoyl-CoA reductase 1, signaling lymphocytic activation molecule family member 7, SRC, and STK4 were observed in patients treated with tocilizumab or anakinra, whereas interferon γ, chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 9, and chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 19 were decreased only after anakinra treatment.

Interpretation

In this exploratory study, adding tocilizumab or anakinra to corticosteroids triggered a much broader immunoregulatory response than can be explained by their receptor-specific actions. The response after tocilizumab occurred more rapidly than that after anakinra, offering a potential advantage in the time-sensitive ICU setting. Additionally, tocilizumab preserved the interferon pathway, crucial for antiviral defense, whereas anakinra suppressed it.
ARDS的免疫调节
靶向免疫调节在COVID-19中的成功强调了其在其他原因引起的ARDS中的潜力。然而,了解其对炎症宿主反应的靶向性和更广泛的影响是很重要的。为了指导未来的ARDS研究,我们使用靶向蛋白质组学在COVID-19患者中探索了这一点。不同的免疫调节剂如何影响covid -19相关急性呼吸窘迫综合征危重患者的免疫特征?研究设计和方法在这项多中心队列研究中,我们使用了2个荷兰生物库来比较COVID-19合并急性呼吸衰竭患者:未接受免疫治疗(n = 18)、皮质类固醇(n = 21)、阿那那单抗加皮质类固醇(n = 9)或托珠单抗加皮质类固醇(n = 22)。在治疗开始后的第0至1天、第2至4天(T3)和第6至8天(T7),使用接近延伸法测量与炎症和心血管损伤相关的血浆蛋白。结果我们观察到,托珠单抗给药后立即和阿那单抗给药后T3开始炎症生物标志物的表达降低。单独使用皮质类固醇治疗后,炎症生物标志物被抑制的较少,且仅在T3时被抑制。T3时的多因素分析发现,仅在托珠单抗治疗后,肿瘤坏死因子相关的凋亡诱导配体、IL-1受体样2和肿瘤坏死因子β显著升高,原癌基因酪氨酸蛋白激酶(SRC)和丝氨酸/苏氨酸激酶4 (STK4)降低。T7时,托珠单抗或阿那金组患者中2,4-二烯基辅酶a还原酶1、信号淋巴细胞激活分子家族成员7、SRC和STK4浓度较低,而干扰素γ、趋化因子(C-X-C基元)配体9和趋化因子(C-C基元)配体19仅在阿那金组治疗后才降低。在这项探索性研究中,将tocilizumab或anakinra添加到皮质类固醇中引发了比其受体特异性作用更广泛的免疫调节反应。托珠单抗治疗后的反应比阿那单抗治疗后的反应更快,在时间敏感的ICU环境中提供了潜在的优势。此外,托珠单抗保留了干扰素通路,这对抗病毒防御至关重要,而阿那金则抑制了它。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CHEST critical care
CHEST critical care Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信