Risk of major adverse cardiovascular events following targeted therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a real-world analysis stratified by cardiovascular risk

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 RHEUMATOLOGY
Seung-Hun You , Soo-Kyung Cho , Jeong-Yeon Kim , Yeo-Jin Song , Sun-Young Jung , Yoon-Kyoung Sung
{"title":"Risk of major adverse cardiovascular events following targeted therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a real-world analysis stratified by cardiovascular risk","authors":"Seung-Hun You ,&nbsp;Soo-Kyung Cho ,&nbsp;Jeong-Yeon Kim ,&nbsp;Yeo-Jin Song ,&nbsp;Sun-Young Jung ,&nbsp;Yoon-Kyoung Sung","doi":"10.1016/j.semarthrit.2025.152721","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To assess the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) associated with Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) compared to tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Using the Korean nationwide claims database, we identified patients with RA prescribed JAKi or TNFi between 2015 and 2019. Patients were stratified into two groups based on cardiovascular (CV) risk and matched within each group using propensity score matching at a ratio of up to 1:4. Follow-up continued until MACE, death, or treatment discontinuation. Hazard ratios with 95 % confidence intervals were calculated using the Cox proportional hazards model. Additionally, MACE risk was analyzed separately in patients with and without a history of cardiovascular disease (Hx.CVD).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 7575 patients prescribed either JAKi or TNFi were included. After propensity score matching, the hazard ratio for MACEs comparing JAKi to TNFi was 0.77 (95 % confidence interval 0.45–1.34) in the high CV risk group. No significant differences in MACEs were observed between JAKi and TNFi users across the low CV risk group, as well as Hx.CVD and non-Hx.CVD groups. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses showed no statistically significant differences in the risk of individual MACE components, such as myocardial infarction, stroke, or heart failure.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>No significant differences in the risk of MACEs were observed between JAKi and TNFi users across various CV risk groups and in those with or without Hx.CVD. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses supported these findings, showing no elevated risks for individual MACE components.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21715,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism","volume":"73 ","pages":"Article 152721"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0049017225000927","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To assess the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) associated with Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) compared to tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Methods

Using the Korean nationwide claims database, we identified patients with RA prescribed JAKi or TNFi between 2015 and 2019. Patients were stratified into two groups based on cardiovascular (CV) risk and matched within each group using propensity score matching at a ratio of up to 1:4. Follow-up continued until MACE, death, or treatment discontinuation. Hazard ratios with 95 % confidence intervals were calculated using the Cox proportional hazards model. Additionally, MACE risk was analyzed separately in patients with and without a history of cardiovascular disease (Hx.CVD).

Results

A total of 7575 patients prescribed either JAKi or TNFi were included. After propensity score matching, the hazard ratio for MACEs comparing JAKi to TNFi was 0.77 (95 % confidence interval 0.45–1.34) in the high CV risk group. No significant differences in MACEs were observed between JAKi and TNFi users across the low CV risk group, as well as Hx.CVD and non-Hx.CVD groups. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses showed no statistically significant differences in the risk of individual MACE components, such as myocardial infarction, stroke, or heart failure.

Conclusion

No significant differences in the risk of MACEs were observed between JAKi and TNFi users across various CV risk groups and in those with or without Hx.CVD. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses supported these findings, showing no elevated risks for individual MACE components.
类风湿关节炎患者靶向治疗后主要不良心血管事件的风险:一项按心血管风险分层的现实世界分析
目的评估类风湿关节炎(RA)中Janus激酶抑制剂(JAKi)与肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂(TNFi)相关的主要不良心血管事件(mace)的风险。方法使用韩国全国索赔数据库,我们确定了2015年至2019年间服用JAKi或TNFi的RA患者。根据心血管(CV)风险将患者分为两组,并在每组内使用倾向评分匹配,比例最高为1:4。随访一直持续到MACE、死亡或停止治疗。使用Cox比例风险模型计算95%置信区间的风险比。此外,对有和无心血管病史(Hx.CVD)患者的MACE风险进行了单独分析。结果共纳入7575例服用JAKi或TNFi的患者。在倾向评分匹配后,在高CV风险组中,JAKi与TNFi的mes风险比为0.77(95%置信区间0.45-1.34)。在低CV风险组和Hx组中,JAKi和TNFi使用者之间的mace没有显著差异。CVD和非hx。心血管疾病组。亚组和敏感性分析显示,个体MACE成分(如心肌梗死、中风或心力衰竭)的风险无统计学显著差异。结论JAKi和TNFi使用者在不同CV风险组以及有无Hx.CVD的mace风险无显著差异。亚组分析和敏感性分析支持这些发现,显示单个MACE成分的风险没有升高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
4.00%
发文量
176
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism provides access to the highest-quality clinical, therapeutic and translational research about arthritis, rheumatology and musculoskeletal disorders that affect the joints and connective tissue. Each bimonthly issue includes articles giving you the latest diagnostic criteria, consensus statements, systematic reviews and meta-analyses as well as clinical and translational research studies. Read this journal for the latest groundbreaking research and to gain insights from scientists and clinicians on the management and treatment of musculoskeletal and autoimmune rheumatologic diseases. The journal is of interest to rheumatologists, orthopedic surgeons, internal medicine physicians, immunologists and specialists in bone and mineral metabolism.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信