Rahul D Kunju,Christi Titus Varghese,Krishnanunni Nair,Shweta Mallick,Binoj Sivasankara Pillai Thankamony Amma,Ramachandran N Menon,Dinesh Balakrishnan,Unnikrishnan Gopalakrishnan,Sudheer Ov,S Sudhindran
{"title":"Intermittent Inflow Occlusion in Robotic Right Donor Hepatectomy: A Randomised Controlled Trial.","authors":"Rahul D Kunju,Christi Titus Varghese,Krishnanunni Nair,Shweta Mallick,Binoj Sivasankara Pillai Thankamony Amma,Ramachandran N Menon,Dinesh Balakrishnan,Unnikrishnan Gopalakrishnan,Sudheer Ov,S Sudhindran","doi":"10.1097/sla.0000000000006733","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\r\nTo assess the safety and efficacy of intermittent inflow occlusion (IIO) during robotic right donor hepatectomy (RDH) for adult living donor liver transplantation.\r\n\r\nSUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA\r\nAlthough evidence supports minimally invasive donor hepatectomy, its adoption by surgeons remains limited. Key challenges include bleeding during parenchymal transection and prolonged warm ischemia during graft extraction, resulting in morbidity in both the donor and recipient.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nBetween April 2022 and June 2023, out of 123 donors suitable for RDH, 113 were randomised to undergo robotic RDH with (n=56) or without (n=57) IIO. The primary endpoint was the blood loss during robotic RDH. The secondary end points included peak levels of bilirubin, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), INR and complications in donors and recipients. Additionally, peak lactate levels and the need for blood transfusion were assessed in donors.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nThe mean duration of IIO was 42.48±11.21 minutes .Blood loss during parenchymal transection (235 (186.25 - 375) vs. 295 (235 - 475),P=0.006) and total blood loss (275 (212.5 - 430) vs. 330 (272.5- 520),P=0.018) were significantly lower among donors in the IIO arm. In recipients belonging to IIO arm, peak ALT (P=0.032) and INR (P=0.012) were significantly low. Although statistically similar, the peak AST (P=0.064) and acute kidney injury (1,P=0.061) in the IIO arm among recipients were also less. Other perioperative outcomes including complications in donors/recipients and overall mortality in recipients remained comparable.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nIIO during robotic RDH is safe. It led to reduced blood loss among donors and improved graft parameters in recipients during the immediate postoperative period.","PeriodicalId":8017,"journal":{"name":"Annals of surgery","volume":"108 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000006733","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
To assess the safety and efficacy of intermittent inflow occlusion (IIO) during robotic right donor hepatectomy (RDH) for adult living donor liver transplantation.
SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA
Although evidence supports minimally invasive donor hepatectomy, its adoption by surgeons remains limited. Key challenges include bleeding during parenchymal transection and prolonged warm ischemia during graft extraction, resulting in morbidity in both the donor and recipient.
METHODS
Between April 2022 and June 2023, out of 123 donors suitable for RDH, 113 were randomised to undergo robotic RDH with (n=56) or without (n=57) IIO. The primary endpoint was the blood loss during robotic RDH. The secondary end points included peak levels of bilirubin, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), INR and complications in donors and recipients. Additionally, peak lactate levels and the need for blood transfusion were assessed in donors.
RESULTS
The mean duration of IIO was 42.48±11.21 minutes .Blood loss during parenchymal transection (235 (186.25 - 375) vs. 295 (235 - 475),P=0.006) and total blood loss (275 (212.5 - 430) vs. 330 (272.5- 520),P=0.018) were significantly lower among donors in the IIO arm. In recipients belonging to IIO arm, peak ALT (P=0.032) and INR (P=0.012) were significantly low. Although statistically similar, the peak AST (P=0.064) and acute kidney injury (1,P=0.061) in the IIO arm among recipients were also less. Other perioperative outcomes including complications in donors/recipients and overall mortality in recipients remained comparable.
CONCLUSION
IIO during robotic RDH is safe. It led to reduced blood loss among donors and improved graft parameters in recipients during the immediate postoperative period.
期刊介绍:
The Annals of Surgery is a renowned surgery journal, recognized globally for its extensive scholarly references. It serves as a valuable resource for the international medical community by disseminating knowledge regarding important developments in surgical science and practice. Surgeons regularly turn to the Annals of Surgery to stay updated on innovative practices and techniques. The journal also offers special editorial features such as "Advances in Surgical Technique," offering timely coverage of ongoing clinical issues. Additionally, the journal publishes monthly review articles that address the latest concerns in surgical practice.