4-Strand hamstring versus single-bundle quadriceps tendon grafts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction at 2 years: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

IF 2 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Jonathan Elias, Mitchell Kaplan, Kunal Shah, Michael Bickford, Chelsea McNamara, Elizabeth Ford, Sean McMillan
{"title":"4-Strand hamstring versus single-bundle quadriceps tendon grafts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction at 2 years: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials","authors":"Jonathan Elias,&nbsp;Mitchell Kaplan,&nbsp;Kunal Shah,&nbsp;Michael Bickford,&nbsp;Chelsea McNamara,&nbsp;Elizabeth Ford,&nbsp;Sean McMillan","doi":"10.1002/jeo2.70244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>To compare the 2-year postoperative outcomes of hamstring tendon (HT) grafts to quadriceps tendon (QT) grafts in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. We hypothesised no significant differences between the two methods.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following the 2020 PRISMA guidelines. Five online databases (Cochrane, Embase, PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science) were screened for prospective randomised controlled trials (RCT). IKDC, Lysholm, Tegner, side-to-side KT-1000 scores and ages were collected. Statistical analysis was conducted with SPSS v29. Between the two groups, a test of between-subgroup homogeneity <i>p</i>-value &lt; 0.05 was used to assess statistical significance, while a <i>Δ</i> Cohen's <i>d</i> ≥ 0.8 was used to assess clinical significance.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Five RCTs were included in the final analysis. The HT group included 87 patients, and the QT group included 93 patients. The mean ages for the HT and QT groups were 28.3 ± 6.6 and 26.5 ± 8.4 years, respectively. HTs yielded clinically higher IKDC scores (<i>Δ</i> Cohen's <i>d</i> = 2.27, <i>p</i> = 0.24), clinically lower side-to-side KT-1000 differences (<i>Δ</i> Cohen's <i>d</i> = 1.65, <i>p</i> = 0.08), and clinically and statistically higher Lysholm scores (<i>Δ</i> Cohen's <i>d</i> = 2.93, <i>p</i> = 0.00). However, QT yielded higher Tegner scores (<i>Δ</i> Cohen's <i>d</i> = 1.68, <i>p</i> = 0.00), whereas HT led to a moderate clinical reduction (Cohen's <i>d</i> = −0.55, <i>p</i> = 0.06, 95% CI [−1.11 to 0.02]).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Compared with the use of the QT graft, the HT graft for ACL reconstruction may result in greater knee function and stability, while QT ACL reconstruction may be associated with increased levels of postsurgical activity in terms of return to sports and work. Future long-term RCTs are needed to confirm our findings.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Level of Evidence</h3>\n \n <p>Level I.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36909,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics","volume":"12 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jeo2.70244","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jeo2.70244","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To compare the 2-year postoperative outcomes of hamstring tendon (HT) grafts to quadriceps tendon (QT) grafts in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. We hypothesised no significant differences between the two methods.

Methods

A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following the 2020 PRISMA guidelines. Five online databases (Cochrane, Embase, PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science) were screened for prospective randomised controlled trials (RCT). IKDC, Lysholm, Tegner, side-to-side KT-1000 scores and ages were collected. Statistical analysis was conducted with SPSS v29. Between the two groups, a test of between-subgroup homogeneity p-value < 0.05 was used to assess statistical significance, while a Δ Cohen's d ≥ 0.8 was used to assess clinical significance.

Results

Five RCTs were included in the final analysis. The HT group included 87 patients, and the QT group included 93 patients. The mean ages for the HT and QT groups were 28.3 ± 6.6 and 26.5 ± 8.4 years, respectively. HTs yielded clinically higher IKDC scores (Δ Cohen's d = 2.27, p = 0.24), clinically lower side-to-side KT-1000 differences (Δ Cohen's d = 1.65, p = 0.08), and clinically and statistically higher Lysholm scores (Δ Cohen's d = 2.93, p = 0.00). However, QT yielded higher Tegner scores (Δ Cohen's d = 1.68, p = 0.00), whereas HT led to a moderate clinical reduction (Cohen's d = −0.55, p = 0.06, 95% CI [−1.11 to 0.02]).

Conclusions

Compared with the use of the QT graft, the HT graft for ACL reconstruction may result in greater knee function and stability, while QT ACL reconstruction may be associated with increased levels of postsurgical activity in terms of return to sports and work. Future long-term RCTs are needed to confirm our findings.

Level of Evidence

Level I.

Abstract Image

前交叉韧带重建中的 4 股腿筋与单束股四头肌肌腱移植 2 年后的对比:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析
目的 比较腘绳肌腱(HT)移植与股四头肌腱(QT)移植在前交叉韧带(ACL)重建中的术后 2 年疗效。我们假设这两种方法之间没有明显差异。 方法 按照 2020 年 PRISMA 指南进行了系统综述和荟萃分析。我们在五个在线数据库(Cochrane、Embase、PubMed、Scopus 和 Web of Science)中筛选了前瞻性随机对照试验(RCT)。收集了 IKDC、Lysholm、Tegner、侧对侧 KT-1000 评分和年龄。统计分析采用 SPSS v29 进行。在两组之间,用组间同质性检验 p 值 < 0.05 来评估统计学意义,而用 Δ Cohen's d ≥ 0.8 来评估临床意义。 结果 最终分析纳入了五项研究。HT 组包括 87 名患者,QT 组包括 93 名患者。HT 组和 QT 组的平均年龄分别为 28.3 ± 6.6 岁和 26.5 ± 8.4 岁。在临床上,HT 组的 IKDC 评分更高(Δ Cohen's d = 2.27,p = 0.24),在临床上,KT-1000 的侧向差异更小(Δ Cohen's d = 1.65,p = 0.08),在临床和统计上,Lysholm 评分更高(Δ Cohen's d = 2.93,p = 0.00)。然而,QT 可提高 Tegner 评分(Δ Cohen's d = 1.68,p = 0.00),而 HT 则可适度降低临床评分(Cohen's d = -0.55,p = 0.06,95% CI [-1.11 to 0.02])。 结论 与使用 QT 移植物相比,使用 HT 移植物进行前交叉韧带重建可能会增强膝关节的功能和稳定性,而 QT 前交叉韧带重建可能会增加术后恢复运动和工作的活动量。未来需要进行长期的研究性试验来证实我们的发现。 证据等级 I 级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics
Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.60%
发文量
114
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信