Identification of Botanicals Based on Their Mass Spectrum Fingerprints Using Ultra-Performance Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry

IF 1.9 3区 化学 Q3 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Akhilesh Kumar, Dipak Kumar Mishra, Sanjeev Kanojiya
{"title":"Identification of Botanicals Based on Their Mass Spectrum Fingerprints Using Ultra-Performance Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry","authors":"Akhilesh Kumar,&nbsp;Dipak Kumar Mishra,&nbsp;Sanjeev Kanojiya","doi":"10.1002/jms.5131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>In the current scenario, herbal raw materials are identified via morphotaxonomy, microscopic pharmacognosy, or DNA barcoding. However, these methods do not reveal their chemical integrity, while plant raw materials play a crucial role in the quality of plant-based medicine. To overcome this limitation, we used a mass spectrometry-based method to identify 30 botanicals. This assay followed a standard operating procedure (SOP) from sample preparation to the reference library's mass spectrum fingerprint (MSFP) search. The MS1 score showed a similarity index between the input data and the reference mass spectrum. A more than 50% MS1 score was the critical threshold for accurately identifying botanicals based on their chemical integrity. Interestingly, the analysis of 30 different plant species yielded no false results. The results were 100% accurate and selective for tested botanical samples. However, we found that the standard deviation of analytical assays and biological replicates was ± 3.5 and ± 6.3 (MS1 score) for all analyzed samples, respectively. Intraspecies variability showed MS1 scores &gt; 50% ± 10, whereas interspecies variability was observed with MS1 scores &lt; 50% ± 10. The MS1 score was observed, dependent on the plant species, ranging from 53.00% (± 2.65) to 89.76% (± 4.08). In addition, the method was tested to see how seasonal and geographical changes affected search results. The MS1 score changed by less than 15%. We simultaneously created a chemical barcode (unique molecular weight sequence) for each plant species to validate search results and ensure the reliable identification of botanicals.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16178,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mass Spectrometry","volume":"60 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mass Spectrometry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jms.5131","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the current scenario, herbal raw materials are identified via morphotaxonomy, microscopic pharmacognosy, or DNA barcoding. However, these methods do not reveal their chemical integrity, while plant raw materials play a crucial role in the quality of plant-based medicine. To overcome this limitation, we used a mass spectrometry-based method to identify 30 botanicals. This assay followed a standard operating procedure (SOP) from sample preparation to the reference library's mass spectrum fingerprint (MSFP) search. The MS1 score showed a similarity index between the input data and the reference mass spectrum. A more than 50% MS1 score was the critical threshold for accurately identifying botanicals based on their chemical integrity. Interestingly, the analysis of 30 different plant species yielded no false results. The results were 100% accurate and selective for tested botanical samples. However, we found that the standard deviation of analytical assays and biological replicates was ± 3.5 and ± 6.3 (MS1 score) for all analyzed samples, respectively. Intraspecies variability showed MS1 scores > 50% ± 10, whereas interspecies variability was observed with MS1 scores < 50% ± 10. The MS1 score was observed, dependent on the plant species, ranging from 53.00% (± 2.65) to 89.76% (± 4.08). In addition, the method was tested to see how seasonal and geographical changes affected search results. The MS1 score changed by less than 15%. We simultaneously created a chemical barcode (unique molecular weight sequence) for each plant species to validate search results and ensure the reliable identification of botanicals.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Mass Spectrometry
Journal of Mass Spectrometry 化学-光谱学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
84
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Mass Spectrometry publishes papers on a broad range of topics of interest to scientists working in both fundamental and applied areas involving the study of gaseous ions. The aim of JMS is to serve the scientific community with information provided and arranged to help senior investigators to better stay abreast of new discoveries and studies in their own field, to make them aware of events and developments in associated fields, and to provide students and newcomers the basic tools with which to learn fundamental and applied aspects of mass spectrometry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信