Amir Haddad , Nili Stein , Ilan Feldhamer , Arnon Dov Cohen , Walid Saliba , Devy Zisman
{"title":"Biologic switching in psoriatic arthritis: Insights from real-world data and key risk factors","authors":"Amir Haddad , Nili Stein , Ilan Feldhamer , Arnon Dov Cohen , Walid Saliba , Devy Zisman","doi":"10.1016/j.semarthrit.2025.152737","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic, heterogeneous inflammatory condition requiring personalized treatment strategies. Biologic therapy switching reflects the disease's dynamic nature and aims to optimize disease control while balancing efficacy, safety, and patient-specific factors.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To analyze real-world switching patterns of biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) in PsA patients, identify associated risk factors, and provide insights into predictors of mode-of-action switching.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective cohort study utilized the Clalit Health Services database (2005–2023), encompassing 9607 PsA patients in Israel. Patients initiating bDMARDs were tracked for therapy switches. Clinical, demographic, and socioeconomic variables were extracted, and statistical analyses compared characteristics between switchers and non-switchers. Patterns of switching were stratified by the number of switches and study periods (2005–2014, 2015–2023).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 3851 patients initiating bDMARDs, 1848 (48 %) switched therapy at least once. Anti-TNF therapy was the dominant first-line choice, but switching to anti-IL17 therapy became prevalent as the first switch in both single-switch and multi-switch scenarios. Subsequent switches often involved cycling back to anti-TNF or transitioning to other modes of action, such as anti-IL23 or JAK inhibitors. Switching patterns remained consistent across study periods<strong>.</strong> Switchers were more likely to be female (56.5 vs. 50.6 %, <em>p</em> < 0.001), obese (28.1 vs. 22.6 %, <em>p</em> < 0.001), smokers (41.6 vs. 37.1 %, <em>p</em> = 0.005), and from lower socioeconomic backgrounds (34.1 vs 31.4 %, <em>p</em> = 0.04). These factors were all independently associated with switching in mechanism of action on multivariate analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Cross class biologic switching is common in PsA management (48 %) and influenced by patient demographics and comorbidities. Switching patterns were consistent across time periods despite expanding therapeutic options.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21715,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism","volume":"73 ","pages":"Article 152737"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0049017225001088","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic, heterogeneous inflammatory condition requiring personalized treatment strategies. Biologic therapy switching reflects the disease's dynamic nature and aims to optimize disease control while balancing efficacy, safety, and patient-specific factors.
Objective
To analyze real-world switching patterns of biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) in PsA patients, identify associated risk factors, and provide insights into predictors of mode-of-action switching.
Methods
This retrospective cohort study utilized the Clalit Health Services database (2005–2023), encompassing 9607 PsA patients in Israel. Patients initiating bDMARDs were tracked for therapy switches. Clinical, demographic, and socioeconomic variables were extracted, and statistical analyses compared characteristics between switchers and non-switchers. Patterns of switching were stratified by the number of switches and study periods (2005–2014, 2015–2023).
Results
Among 3851 patients initiating bDMARDs, 1848 (48 %) switched therapy at least once. Anti-TNF therapy was the dominant first-line choice, but switching to anti-IL17 therapy became prevalent as the first switch in both single-switch and multi-switch scenarios. Subsequent switches often involved cycling back to anti-TNF or transitioning to other modes of action, such as anti-IL23 or JAK inhibitors. Switching patterns remained consistent across study periods. Switchers were more likely to be female (56.5 vs. 50.6 %, p < 0.001), obese (28.1 vs. 22.6 %, p < 0.001), smokers (41.6 vs. 37.1 %, p = 0.005), and from lower socioeconomic backgrounds (34.1 vs 31.4 %, p = 0.04). These factors were all independently associated with switching in mechanism of action on multivariate analysis.
Conclusion
Cross class biologic switching is common in PsA management (48 %) and influenced by patient demographics and comorbidities. Switching patterns were consistent across time periods despite expanding therapeutic options.
银屑病关节炎(PsA)是一种慢性、异质性炎症,需要个性化的治疗策略。生物治疗转换反映了疾病的动态性,旨在优化疾病控制,同时平衡疗效、安全性和患者特异性因素。目的分析PsA患者生物疾病改善抗风湿药物(bDMARDs)的现实转换模式,识别相关危险因素,并为作用方式转换的预测因素提供见解。方法本回顾性队列研究利用Clalit Health Services数据库(2005-2023),包括以色列9607例PsA患者。追踪启动bdmard的患者的治疗转换。提取临床、人口统计学和社会经济变量,并进行统计分析,比较转换者和非转换者的特征。根据开关数量和研究周期(2005-2014年,2015-2023年)对切换模式进行分层。结果在3851例启动bdmard的患者中,1848例(48%)至少转换了一次治疗。抗肿瘤坏死因子治疗是主要的一线选择,但在单开关和多开关情况下,切换到抗il - 17治疗作为第一开关变得普遍。随后的转换通常涉及循环回到抗tnf或过渡到其他作用模式,如抗il - 23或JAK抑制剂。在整个研究期间,转换模式保持一致。转换者更有可能是女性(56.5%对50.6%,p <;0.001),肥胖(28.1比22.6%,p <;0.001)、吸烟者(41.6 vs 37.1%, p = 0.005)和社会经济背景较低者(34.1% vs 31.4%, p = 0.04)。多变量分析表明,这些因素在作用机制上均与开关独立相关。结论跨类生物转换在PsA治疗中很常见(48%),并受患者人口统计学和合并症的影响。尽管有更多的治疗选择,但转换模式在不同时期是一致的。
期刊介绍:
Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism provides access to the highest-quality clinical, therapeutic and translational research about arthritis, rheumatology and musculoskeletal disorders that affect the joints and connective tissue. Each bimonthly issue includes articles giving you the latest diagnostic criteria, consensus statements, systematic reviews and meta-analyses as well as clinical and translational research studies. Read this journal for the latest groundbreaking research and to gain insights from scientists and clinicians on the management and treatment of musculoskeletal and autoimmune rheumatologic diseases. The journal is of interest to rheumatologists, orthopedic surgeons, internal medicine physicians, immunologists and specialists in bone and mineral metabolism.