Biologic switching in psoriatic arthritis: Insights from real-world data and key risk factors

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 RHEUMATOLOGY
Amir Haddad , Nili Stein , Ilan Feldhamer , Arnon Dov Cohen , Walid Saliba , Devy Zisman
{"title":"Biologic switching in psoriatic arthritis: Insights from real-world data and key risk factors","authors":"Amir Haddad ,&nbsp;Nili Stein ,&nbsp;Ilan Feldhamer ,&nbsp;Arnon Dov Cohen ,&nbsp;Walid Saliba ,&nbsp;Devy Zisman","doi":"10.1016/j.semarthrit.2025.152737","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic, heterogeneous inflammatory condition requiring personalized treatment strategies. Biologic therapy switching reflects the disease's dynamic nature and aims to optimize disease control while balancing efficacy, safety, and patient-specific factors.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To analyze real-world switching patterns of biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) in PsA patients, identify associated risk factors, and provide insights into predictors of mode-of-action switching.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective cohort study utilized the Clalit Health Services database (2005–2023), encompassing 9607 PsA patients in Israel. Patients initiating bDMARDs were tracked for therapy switches. Clinical, demographic, and socioeconomic variables were extracted, and statistical analyses compared characteristics between switchers and non-switchers. Patterns of switching were stratified by the number of switches and study periods (2005–2014, 2015–2023).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 3851 patients initiating bDMARDs, 1848 (48 %) switched therapy at least once. Anti-TNF therapy was the dominant first-line choice, but switching to anti-IL17 therapy became prevalent as the first switch in both single-switch and multi-switch scenarios. Subsequent switches often involved cycling back to anti-TNF or transitioning to other modes of action, such as anti-IL23 or JAK inhibitors. Switching patterns remained consistent across study periods<strong>.</strong> Switchers were more likely to be female (56.5 vs. 50.6 %, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), obese (28.1 vs. 22.6 %, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), smokers (41.6 vs. 37.1 %, <em>p</em> = 0.005), and from lower socioeconomic backgrounds (34.1 vs 31.4 %, <em>p</em> = 0.04). These factors were all independently associated with switching in mechanism of action on multivariate analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Cross class biologic switching is common in PsA management (48 %) and influenced by patient demographics and comorbidities. Switching patterns were consistent across time periods despite expanding therapeutic options.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21715,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism","volume":"73 ","pages":"Article 152737"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0049017225001088","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic, heterogeneous inflammatory condition requiring personalized treatment strategies. Biologic therapy switching reflects the disease's dynamic nature and aims to optimize disease control while balancing efficacy, safety, and patient-specific factors.

Objective

To analyze real-world switching patterns of biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) in PsA patients, identify associated risk factors, and provide insights into predictors of mode-of-action switching.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study utilized the Clalit Health Services database (2005–2023), encompassing 9607 PsA patients in Israel. Patients initiating bDMARDs were tracked for therapy switches. Clinical, demographic, and socioeconomic variables were extracted, and statistical analyses compared characteristics between switchers and non-switchers. Patterns of switching were stratified by the number of switches and study periods (2005–2014, 2015–2023).

Results

Among 3851 patients initiating bDMARDs, 1848 (48 %) switched therapy at least once. Anti-TNF therapy was the dominant first-line choice, but switching to anti-IL17 therapy became prevalent as the first switch in both single-switch and multi-switch scenarios. Subsequent switches often involved cycling back to anti-TNF or transitioning to other modes of action, such as anti-IL23 or JAK inhibitors. Switching patterns remained consistent across study periods. Switchers were more likely to be female (56.5 vs. 50.6 %, p < 0.001), obese (28.1 vs. 22.6 %, p < 0.001), smokers (41.6 vs. 37.1 %, p = 0.005), and from lower socioeconomic backgrounds (34.1 vs 31.4 %, p = 0.04). These factors were all independently associated with switching in mechanism of action on multivariate analysis.

Conclusion

Cross class biologic switching is common in PsA management (48 %) and influenced by patient demographics and comorbidities. Switching patterns were consistent across time periods despite expanding therapeutic options.
银屑病关节炎的生物制剂转换:真实世界数据和关键风险因素的启示
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
4.00%
发文量
176
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism provides access to the highest-quality clinical, therapeutic and translational research about arthritis, rheumatology and musculoskeletal disorders that affect the joints and connective tissue. Each bimonthly issue includes articles giving you the latest diagnostic criteria, consensus statements, systematic reviews and meta-analyses as well as clinical and translational research studies. Read this journal for the latest groundbreaking research and to gain insights from scientists and clinicians on the management and treatment of musculoskeletal and autoimmune rheumatologic diseases. The journal is of interest to rheumatologists, orthopedic surgeons, internal medicine physicians, immunologists and specialists in bone and mineral metabolism.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信