Jamie Kesten BA , Michael Mlynash MD, MS , Nicole Yuen MS , Pierre Seners MD, PhD , Anke Wouters MD , Maya Schwartz BS , Gregory W. Albers MD , Maarten G. Lansberg MD, PhD , Jeremy J. Heit MD, PhD
{"title":"Acute ischemic stroke patient factors associated with poor outcomes in patients with favorable collaterals and successful thrombectomy","authors":"Jamie Kesten BA , Michael Mlynash MD, MS , Nicole Yuen MS , Pierre Seners MD, PhD , Anke Wouters MD , Maya Schwartz BS , Gregory W. Albers MD , Maarten G. Lansberg MD, PhD , Jeremy J. Heit MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2025.108311","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Favorable arterial collaterals are correlated to favorable outcomes after endovascular thrombectomy (EVT), but many patients still have unfavorable outcomes despite favorable collaterals and successful reperfusion. We determined factors associated with favorable outcome in patients with good collaterals who had successful EVT.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>In a post hoc analysis of the prospective CRISP 2 study, we identified patients with good collaterals (Tan≥2) and successful reperfusion (TICI 2b-3). Favorable (mRS 0-2) and unfavorable outcome (mRS 3-6) groups were compared to identify clinical, imaging, and treatment predictors of favorable outcome.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>92 patients were included. 33.7 % had favorable outcomes. There were no differences in sex (52 % females versus 54 % females; <em>p</em> = 0.821) or age (71 years [IQR 56-79] versus 68 years [IQR 57-79]; <em>p</em> = 0.859) in favorable versus unfavorable groups, respectively. Favorable outcome patients had more frequent intravenous thrombolysis (52 % versus 23 %; <em>p</em> = 0.006), shorter EVT procedures (27 min [IQR 23-40] versus 46 min ([IQR 27-64], and lower baseline NIHSS (12 [IQR 9-15] versus 16 [IQR 12-20]; <em>p</em> = 0.006). There were no differences in the frequency of TICI 3 rates (48 % vs. 38 %; <em>p</em> = 0.325) or first pass effect between the two groups (61 % vs. 57 %; <em>p</em> = 0.719). In a multivariable regression analysis, pre-stroke mRS 1 versus 0 versus (OR 0.15 [95 % CI: 0.03-0.78]; <em>p</em> = 0.024), pre-stroke mRS ≥3 versus 0 (OR 0.04 [95 % CI: 0.002-0.94]; <em>p</em> = 0.046), intravenous thrombolysis administration (OR 3.27 [95 % CI: 1.04-10.33]; <em>p</em> = 0.043) and EVT procedure time (OR for every 5 min 0.98 [95 % CI: 0.81-0.98]; <em>p</em> = 0.022) were modifiable predictors of favorable outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Among patients with good collaterals and successful reperfusion following EVT, favorable outcomes were associated with lower baseline mRS, intravenous thrombolysis administration, and shorter EVT procedure times.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54368,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Stroke & Cerebrovascular Diseases","volume":"34 6","pages":"Article 108311"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Stroke & Cerebrovascular Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1052305725000904","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives
Favorable arterial collaterals are correlated to favorable outcomes after endovascular thrombectomy (EVT), but many patients still have unfavorable outcomes despite favorable collaterals and successful reperfusion. We determined factors associated with favorable outcome in patients with good collaterals who had successful EVT.
Materials and methods
In a post hoc analysis of the prospective CRISP 2 study, we identified patients with good collaterals (Tan≥2) and successful reperfusion (TICI 2b-3). Favorable (mRS 0-2) and unfavorable outcome (mRS 3-6) groups were compared to identify clinical, imaging, and treatment predictors of favorable outcome.
Results
92 patients were included. 33.7 % had favorable outcomes. There were no differences in sex (52 % females versus 54 % females; p = 0.821) or age (71 years [IQR 56-79] versus 68 years [IQR 57-79]; p = 0.859) in favorable versus unfavorable groups, respectively. Favorable outcome patients had more frequent intravenous thrombolysis (52 % versus 23 %; p = 0.006), shorter EVT procedures (27 min [IQR 23-40] versus 46 min ([IQR 27-64], and lower baseline NIHSS (12 [IQR 9-15] versus 16 [IQR 12-20]; p = 0.006). There were no differences in the frequency of TICI 3 rates (48 % vs. 38 %; p = 0.325) or first pass effect between the two groups (61 % vs. 57 %; p = 0.719). In a multivariable regression analysis, pre-stroke mRS 1 versus 0 versus (OR 0.15 [95 % CI: 0.03-0.78]; p = 0.024), pre-stroke mRS ≥3 versus 0 (OR 0.04 [95 % CI: 0.002-0.94]; p = 0.046), intravenous thrombolysis administration (OR 3.27 [95 % CI: 1.04-10.33]; p = 0.043) and EVT procedure time (OR for every 5 min 0.98 [95 % CI: 0.81-0.98]; p = 0.022) were modifiable predictors of favorable outcomes.
Conclusions
Among patients with good collaterals and successful reperfusion following EVT, favorable outcomes were associated with lower baseline mRS, intravenous thrombolysis administration, and shorter EVT procedure times.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Stroke & Cerebrovascular Diseases publishes original papers on basic and clinical science related to the fields of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases. The Journal also features review articles, controversies, methods and technical notes, selected case reports and other original articles of special nature. Its editorial mission is to focus on prevention and repair of cerebrovascular disease. Clinical papers emphasize medical and surgical aspects of stroke, clinical trials and design, epidemiology, stroke care delivery systems and outcomes, imaging sciences and rehabilitation of stroke. The Journal will be of special interest to specialists involved in caring for patients with cerebrovascular disease, including neurologists, neurosurgeons and cardiologists.