Evaluation of minor labial salivary gland focus score in Sjögren's disease using deep learning: a tool for more efficient diagnosis and future tissue biomarker discovery
Konstantinos N. Panagiotopoulos , Nikos Tsiknakis , Dimitrios I. Zaridis , Clio P. Mavragani , Athanasios G. Tzioufas , Dimitrios I. Fotiadis , Andreas V. Goules
{"title":"Evaluation of minor labial salivary gland focus score in Sjögren's disease using deep learning: a tool for more efficient diagnosis and future tissue biomarker discovery","authors":"Konstantinos N. Panagiotopoulos , Nikos Tsiknakis , Dimitrios I. Zaridis , Clio P. Mavragani , Athanasios G. Tzioufas , Dimitrios I. Fotiadis , Andreas V. Goules","doi":"10.1016/j.jaut.2025.103418","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Sjögren's Disease (SjD) is histopathologically characterized by focal sialadenitis in minor labial salivary gland biopsies (mLSGB), which is evaluated by utilizing the focus score (FS). Focus score ≥1 identification is a critical step of the diagnostic approach and SjD classification. Nonetheless, during mLSGB analysis, FS reporting is neglected in a staggering 17 %, and a degree of inter-observer variability is introduced, even among specialized university centers. As the unmet need for reliable FS reporting is displayed, leveraging artificial intelligence in mLSGB evaluation shows encouraging potential and mandates to be investigated.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Minor LSGBs stained only with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) during evaluation of individuals with a clinical suspicion of SjD, were randomly chosen from our archive. All mLSGBs were scanned digitally as whole slide images (WSI) and the final dataset was partitioned into a training (70 %) and a test set (30 %). An attention-based deep learning binary classification model was employed for evaluation of mLSGBs positivity (FS ≥ 1 or FS < 1).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The final dataset consisted of 271 mLSGBs, with 153 (56 %) having FS < 1 and 118 (44 %) FS ≥ 1. In the FS ≥ 1 subset, 74 (63 %) were in the FS = 1–2 range, and the remaining biopsies had FS > 2, following the expected FS distribution among the typical SjD population. Our model resulted in: AUC = 0.932 (0.881–0.984), sensitivity 87 % (0.733–0.944), specificity 84 % (0.71–0.915) and accuracy 85.2 % (0.763–0.912), achieving better performance from previous works.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Artificial intelligence models may overcome the intra-observer biases and inter-observer variability in FS evaluation, reinforcing the diagnosis and biomarker discovery in SjD.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15245,"journal":{"name":"Journal of autoimmunity","volume":"153 ","pages":"Article 103418"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of autoimmunity","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0896841125000630","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Sjögren's Disease (SjD) is histopathologically characterized by focal sialadenitis in minor labial salivary gland biopsies (mLSGB), which is evaluated by utilizing the focus score (FS). Focus score ≥1 identification is a critical step of the diagnostic approach and SjD classification. Nonetheless, during mLSGB analysis, FS reporting is neglected in a staggering 17 %, and a degree of inter-observer variability is introduced, even among specialized university centers. As the unmet need for reliable FS reporting is displayed, leveraging artificial intelligence in mLSGB evaluation shows encouraging potential and mandates to be investigated.
Methods
Minor LSGBs stained only with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) during evaluation of individuals with a clinical suspicion of SjD, were randomly chosen from our archive. All mLSGBs were scanned digitally as whole slide images (WSI) and the final dataset was partitioned into a training (70 %) and a test set (30 %). An attention-based deep learning binary classification model was employed for evaluation of mLSGBs positivity (FS ≥ 1 or FS < 1).
Results
The final dataset consisted of 271 mLSGBs, with 153 (56 %) having FS < 1 and 118 (44 %) FS ≥ 1. In the FS ≥ 1 subset, 74 (63 %) were in the FS = 1–2 range, and the remaining biopsies had FS > 2, following the expected FS distribution among the typical SjD population. Our model resulted in: AUC = 0.932 (0.881–0.984), sensitivity 87 % (0.733–0.944), specificity 84 % (0.71–0.915) and accuracy 85.2 % (0.763–0.912), achieving better performance from previous works.
Conclusion
Artificial intelligence models may overcome the intra-observer biases and inter-observer variability in FS evaluation, reinforcing the diagnosis and biomarker discovery in SjD.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Autoimmunity serves as the primary publication for research on various facets of autoimmunity. These include topics such as the mechanism of self-recognition, regulation of autoimmune responses, experimental autoimmune diseases, diagnostic tests for autoantibodies, as well as the epidemiology, pathophysiology, and treatment of autoimmune diseases. While the journal covers a wide range of subjects, it emphasizes papers exploring the genetic, molecular biology, and cellular aspects of the field.
The Journal of Translational Autoimmunity, on the other hand, is a subsidiary journal of the Journal of Autoimmunity. It focuses specifically on translating scientific discoveries in autoimmunity into clinical applications and practical solutions. By highlighting research that bridges the gap between basic science and clinical practice, the Journal of Translational Autoimmunity aims to advance the understanding and treatment of autoimmune diseases.