Factors and outcomes associated with successful minimally invasive pneumonectomy

Winston L. Trope BE , Ntemena Kapula MS , Irmina A. Elliott MD , Brandon A. Guenthart MD , Natalie S. Lui MD , Leah M. Backhus MD , Mark F. Berry MD , Joseph B. Shrager MD , Douglas Z. Liou MD
{"title":"Factors and outcomes associated with successful minimally invasive pneumonectomy","authors":"Winston L. Trope BE ,&nbsp;Ntemena Kapula MS ,&nbsp;Irmina A. Elliott MD ,&nbsp;Brandon A. Guenthart MD ,&nbsp;Natalie S. Lui MD ,&nbsp;Leah M. Backhus MD ,&nbsp;Mark F. Berry MD ,&nbsp;Joseph B. Shrager MD ,&nbsp;Douglas Z. Liou MD","doi":"10.1016/j.xjon.2025.02.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To test the hypothesis that patients undergoing minimally invasive pneumonectomy at high-volume minimally invasive lung surgery centers have improved survival compared with patients who undergo open pneumonectomy.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients from the National Cancer Database who underwent pneumonectomy for lung cancer between 2010 and 2020 were stratified into 3 groups according to surgical technique (open, minimally invasive, converted from minimally invasive to open). Institutions were categorized as low-, mid-, or high-volume minimally invasive lung surgery centers according to percentage of total anatomic lung resections performed by video-assisted or robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. Outcomes were compared using Cox regression, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, and propensity score matching.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In total, 5750 patients from 850 facilities were included, with 4597 (79.9%) undergoing upfront open pneumonectomy. Among the 1153 attempted minimally invasive pneumonectomies, 364 (31.6%) required conversion to open pneumonectomy. Surgery at a non−high-volume center was associated with greater conversion risk (adjusted odds ratio, 4.16; <em>P</em> &lt; .001), whereas neoadjuvant therapy was associated with lower risk (adjusted odds ratio, 0.60; <em>P</em> = .015). Similar 5-year overall survival was seen among the 3 groups (open 45.2%, minimally invasive 48.3%, converted 43.3%); however, conversion from minimally invasive to open pneumonectomy demonstrated a trend towards increased risk of death (hazard ratio, 1.16; <em>P</em> = .058).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Minimally invasive pneumonectomy for lung cancer had similar 5-year survival compared with open pneumonectomy. However, conversion from minimally invasive to open pneumonectomy showed a trend toward increased risk of death, and conversion rates were high irrespective of institutional minimally invasive lung surgery volume. Careful patient selection is necessary when considering minimally invasive pneumonectomy so that long-term outcomes are not compromised.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74032,"journal":{"name":"JTCVS open","volume":"24 ","pages":"Pages 423-437"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JTCVS open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666273625000543","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To test the hypothesis that patients undergoing minimally invasive pneumonectomy at high-volume minimally invasive lung surgery centers have improved survival compared with patients who undergo open pneumonectomy.

Methods

Patients from the National Cancer Database who underwent pneumonectomy for lung cancer between 2010 and 2020 were stratified into 3 groups according to surgical technique (open, minimally invasive, converted from minimally invasive to open). Institutions were categorized as low-, mid-, or high-volume minimally invasive lung surgery centers according to percentage of total anatomic lung resections performed by video-assisted or robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. Outcomes were compared using Cox regression, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, and propensity score matching.

Results

In total, 5750 patients from 850 facilities were included, with 4597 (79.9%) undergoing upfront open pneumonectomy. Among the 1153 attempted minimally invasive pneumonectomies, 364 (31.6%) required conversion to open pneumonectomy. Surgery at a non−high-volume center was associated with greater conversion risk (adjusted odds ratio, 4.16; P < .001), whereas neoadjuvant therapy was associated with lower risk (adjusted odds ratio, 0.60; P = .015). Similar 5-year overall survival was seen among the 3 groups (open 45.2%, minimally invasive 48.3%, converted 43.3%); however, conversion from minimally invasive to open pneumonectomy demonstrated a trend towards increased risk of death (hazard ratio, 1.16; P = .058).

Conclusions

Minimally invasive pneumonectomy for lung cancer had similar 5-year survival compared with open pneumonectomy. However, conversion from minimally invasive to open pneumonectomy showed a trend toward increased risk of death, and conversion rates were high irrespective of institutional minimally invasive lung surgery volume. Careful patient selection is necessary when considering minimally invasive pneumonectomy so that long-term outcomes are not compromised.
微创全肺切除术成功的相关因素和结果
目的验证在大容量微创肺手术中心行微创全肺切除术的患者比行开放式全肺切除术的患者生存率更高的假设。方法将2010 - 2020年在美国国家癌症数据库中接受肺癌全肺切除术的患者根据手术技术(开放、微创、微创转开放)分为3组。根据视频辅助或机器人辅助胸腔镜手术所进行的解剖性肺切除总量的百分比,将机构分为低、中、高容量微创肺手术中心。结果采用Cox回归、Kaplan-Meier生存分析和倾向评分匹配进行比较。结果共纳入850家医院5750例患者,其中4597例(79.9%)行术前开放式全肺切除术。在1153例尝试微创肺切除术的患者中,364例(31.6%)需要转为开放式肺切除术。在非大容量中心进行手术与更高的转换风险相关(校正优势比,4.16;P & lt;.001),而新辅助治疗与较低的风险相关(调整优势比,0.60;p = .015)。3组的5年总生存率相似(开放性45.2%,微创48.3%,转行性43.3%);然而,从微创转为开放式全肺切除术显示出死亡风险增加的趋势(风险比,1.16;p = .058)。结论肺癌微创全肺切除术与开放式全肺切除术的5年生存率相近。然而,从微创肺切除术到开放式肺切除术的转换显示出死亡风险增加的趋势,并且与机构微创肺手术量无关,转换率很高。在考虑微创全肺切除术时,谨慎的患者选择是必要的,这样长期的结果才不会受到影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信