Liri Fang , Malik Oyewale Salami , Griffin M. Weber , Vetle I. Torvik
{"title":"uCite: The union of nine large-scale public PubMed citation datasets with reliability filtering","authors":"Liri Fang , Malik Oyewale Salami , Griffin M. Weber , Vetle I. Torvik","doi":"10.1016/j.dib.2025.111535","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>There has been a recent push to make public, aggregate, and increase coverage of bibliographic citation data. Here we describe uCite, a citation dataset containing 564 million PubMed citation pairs aggregated from the following nine sources: PubMed Central, iCite, OpenCitations, Dimensions, Microsoft Academic Graph, Aminer, Semantic Scholar, Lens, and OpCitance. Of these, 51 million (9%) were labeled unreliable, as determined by patterns of source discrepancies explained by ambiguous metadata, crosswalk, and typographical errors, citing future publications, and multi-paper documents. Each source contributes to improved coverage and reliability, but varies dramatically in precision and recall, estimates of which are contrasted with the Web of Science and Scopus herein.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10973,"journal":{"name":"Data in Brief","volume":"60 ","pages":"Article 111535"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Data in Brief","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352340925002677","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
There has been a recent push to make public, aggregate, and increase coverage of bibliographic citation data. Here we describe uCite, a citation dataset containing 564 million PubMed citation pairs aggregated from the following nine sources: PubMed Central, iCite, OpenCitations, Dimensions, Microsoft Academic Graph, Aminer, Semantic Scholar, Lens, and OpCitance. Of these, 51 million (9%) were labeled unreliable, as determined by patterns of source discrepancies explained by ambiguous metadata, crosswalk, and typographical errors, citing future publications, and multi-paper documents. Each source contributes to improved coverage and reliability, but varies dramatically in precision and recall, estimates of which are contrasted with the Web of Science and Scopus herein.
期刊介绍:
Data in Brief provides a way for researchers to easily share and reuse each other''s datasets by publishing data articles that: -Thoroughly describe your data, facilitating reproducibility. -Make your data, which is often buried in supplementary material, easier to find. -Increase traffic towards associated research articles and data, leading to more citations. -Open up doors for new collaborations. Because you never know what data will be useful to someone else, Data in Brief welcomes submissions that describe data from all research areas.