Influence of socioeconomic status on postoperative outcomes in acute type A aortic dissection repair

Benjamin Hambright BS , Lamario Williams MD, PhD , Rongbing Xie DrPH, MPH , Sasha A. Still MD
{"title":"Influence of socioeconomic status on postoperative outcomes in acute type A aortic dissection repair","authors":"Benjamin Hambright BS ,&nbsp;Lamario Williams MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Rongbing Xie DrPH, MPH ,&nbsp;Sasha A. Still MD","doi":"10.1016/j.xjon.2025.01.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Type A aortic dissection repair is an emergency operation associated with both higher perioperative and postoperative risk. This study investigates the influence of socioeconomic status, as measured by the Distressed Communities Index (DCI), on patients who underwent acute aortic dissection repair and their postoperative outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a retrospective analysis of 240 adult patients who underwent repair for acute Stanford Type A aortic dissection from 2009 to 2021. Patients were categorized into an at-risk group (DCI score ≥75) and a not-at-risk group (DCI score &lt;75) based on their zip code. We collected demographic, clinical, operative, and postoperative outcomes, analyzing data using descriptive statistics and multivariable logistic regression. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis assessed 5-year survival outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>At-risk patients were significantly younger (52 vs 59 years; <em>P</em> = .03) and more commonly African American (59.02% vs 26.5%; <em>P</em> &lt; .0001). Although chronic health condition rates were similar, at-risk patients showed trends toward higher rates of postoperative respiratory failure (27.1% vs 18.0%; <em>P</em> = .0926) and longer hospital stays (27.05% vs 15.25% for length of stay of 8-13 days; <em>P</em> = .065). However, rates of postoperative complications, including 30-day mortality and 5-year survival, were not significantly different between groups, and at-risk status did not significantly predict mortality (hazard ratio, 1.35; 95% CI, 0.65-2.79; <em>P</em> = .43).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Patients undergoing urgent surgery for acute Type A aortic dissection have similar postoperative outcomes, although at-risk patients may experience longer hospital stays and higher respiratory failure rates. Further study is necessary to understand the effect of DCI score on intermediate and long-term outcomes to mitigate social disparities and diminish modifiable risk factors.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74032,"journal":{"name":"JTCVS open","volume":"24 ","pages":"Pages 332-340"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JTCVS open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666273625000397","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Type A aortic dissection repair is an emergency operation associated with both higher perioperative and postoperative risk. This study investigates the influence of socioeconomic status, as measured by the Distressed Communities Index (DCI), on patients who underwent acute aortic dissection repair and their postoperative outcomes.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis of 240 adult patients who underwent repair for acute Stanford Type A aortic dissection from 2009 to 2021. Patients were categorized into an at-risk group (DCI score ≥75) and a not-at-risk group (DCI score <75) based on their zip code. We collected demographic, clinical, operative, and postoperative outcomes, analyzing data using descriptive statistics and multivariable logistic regression. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis assessed 5-year survival outcomes.

Results

At-risk patients were significantly younger (52 vs 59 years; P = .03) and more commonly African American (59.02% vs 26.5%; P < .0001). Although chronic health condition rates were similar, at-risk patients showed trends toward higher rates of postoperative respiratory failure (27.1% vs 18.0%; P = .0926) and longer hospital stays (27.05% vs 15.25% for length of stay of 8-13 days; P = .065). However, rates of postoperative complications, including 30-day mortality and 5-year survival, were not significantly different between groups, and at-risk status did not significantly predict mortality (hazard ratio, 1.35; 95% CI, 0.65-2.79; P = .43).

Conclusions

Patients undergoing urgent surgery for acute Type A aortic dissection have similar postoperative outcomes, although at-risk patients may experience longer hospital stays and higher respiratory failure rates. Further study is necessary to understand the effect of DCI score on intermediate and long-term outcomes to mitigate social disparities and diminish modifiable risk factors.
社会经济状况对急性A型主动脉夹层修复术后疗效的影响
目的A型主动脉夹层修复术是一种围手术期和术后风险较高的急诊手术。本研究调查了社会经济地位对急性主动脉夹层修复患者及其术后结果的影响,以痛苦社区指数(DCI)衡量。方法回顾性分析2009年至2021年接受Stanford a型主动脉夹层修复术的240例成人患者。根据邮政编码将患者分为高危组(DCI评分≥75)和非高危组(DCI评分<;75)。我们收集了人口统计学、临床、手术和术后的结果,使用描述性统计和多变量logistic回归分析数据。Kaplan-Meier生存分析评估5年生存结果。结果sat风险患者明显年轻化(52岁vs 59岁;P = .03),更常见的是非裔美国人(59.02% vs 26.5%;P & lt;。)。尽管慢性健康状况的发生率相似,但高危患者的术后呼吸衰竭发生率更高(27.1% vs 18.0%;P = .0926)和更长的住院时间(27.05% vs 15.25%的住院时间为8-13天;p = .065)。然而,术后并发症发生率,包括30天死亡率和5年生存率,在两组之间没有显著差异,高危状态不能显著预测死亡率(风险比,1.35;95% ci, 0.65-2.79;p = .43)。结论急性A型主动脉夹层患者接受紧急手术后的预后相似,但高危患者可能会经历更长的住院时间和更高的呼吸衰竭率。进一步的研究需要了解DCI评分对中期和长期结局的影响,以减轻社会差异和减少可改变的危险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信