Quality of life outcomes after robotic-assisted and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for early-stage non–small cell lung cancer

Jiafang Zhang MS , Rowena Yip PhD, MPH , Emanuela Taioli MD, PhD , Raja M. Flores MD , Claudia I. Henschke PhD, MD , David F. Yankelevitz MD , Rebecca M. Schwartz PhD
{"title":"Quality of life outcomes after robotic-assisted and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for early-stage non–small cell lung cancer","authors":"Jiafang Zhang MS ,&nbsp;Rowena Yip PhD, MPH ,&nbsp;Emanuela Taioli MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Raja M. Flores MD ,&nbsp;Claudia I. Henschke PhD, MD ,&nbsp;David F. Yankelevitz MD ,&nbsp;Rebecca M. Schwartz PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.xjon.2025.01.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Limited research exists comparing the impacts of robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) and video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) on patients’ physical and mental health-related quality of life (QoL).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A prospective cohort of stage IA non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients in the Initiative for Early Lung Cancer Research on Treatment from Mount Sinai Health System had QoL measured before surgery and at 2, 6, and 12 months post-treatment using the Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form 12 (SF-12), with Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS); the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung Cancer Subscale (FACT-LCS); and Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-4; for depression/anxiety). A locally weighted smoothing curve was fitted to identify the best interval knot for post-treatment QoL trends. A piecewise linear mixed-effects model was developed to estimate differences in baseline, 2-month, and 12-month QoL scores and rates of change, adjusting for age, sex, race, ethnicity, smoking status, pack-years, nodule size/consistency, comorbidities, and surgical extent.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The study cohort comprised 698 patients, including 458 (65.6%) who underwent VATS and 240 (34.4%) who underwent RATS. The RATS group exhibited a more significant initial decline in physical health at 2 months post-surgery but showed significant recovery by 12 months, achieving similar or slightly higher physical scores compared to baseline. No significant differences in mental health scores over time were seen between the groups. Both groups displayed consistent anxiety and depression scores, with significant improvements in anxiety symptoms at the 2-month mark. The RATS group had fewer postoperative complications and conversion to open thoracotomy.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>RATS and VATS offer similar long-term QoL outcomes for early-stage NSCLC patients, though RATS patients may experience a sharper initial decline in physical health.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74032,"journal":{"name":"JTCVS open","volume":"24 ","pages":"Pages 383-393"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JTCVS open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666273625000336","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Limited research exists comparing the impacts of robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) and video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) on patients’ physical and mental health-related quality of life (QoL).

Methods

A prospective cohort of stage IA non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients in the Initiative for Early Lung Cancer Research on Treatment from Mount Sinai Health System had QoL measured before surgery and at 2, 6, and 12 months post-treatment using the Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form 12 (SF-12), with Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS); the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung Cancer Subscale (FACT-LCS); and Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-4; for depression/anxiety). A locally weighted smoothing curve was fitted to identify the best interval knot for post-treatment QoL trends. A piecewise linear mixed-effects model was developed to estimate differences in baseline, 2-month, and 12-month QoL scores and rates of change, adjusting for age, sex, race, ethnicity, smoking status, pack-years, nodule size/consistency, comorbidities, and surgical extent.

Results

The study cohort comprised 698 patients, including 458 (65.6%) who underwent VATS and 240 (34.4%) who underwent RATS. The RATS group exhibited a more significant initial decline in physical health at 2 months post-surgery but showed significant recovery by 12 months, achieving similar or slightly higher physical scores compared to baseline. No significant differences in mental health scores over time were seen between the groups. Both groups displayed consistent anxiety and depression scores, with significant improvements in anxiety symptoms at the 2-month mark. The RATS group had fewer postoperative complications and conversion to open thoracotomy.

Conclusions

RATS and VATS offer similar long-term QoL outcomes for early-stage NSCLC patients, though RATS patients may experience a sharper initial decline in physical health.
机器人辅助和视频辅助胸腔镜手术治疗早期非小细胞肺癌后的生活质量结果
关于机器人辅助胸外科手术(RATS)和视频辅助胸外科手术(VATS)对患者身心健康相关生活质量(QoL)影响的比较研究有限。方法:在西奈山卫生系统早期肺癌治疗研究项目中,对IA期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者进行前瞻性队列研究,使用医学结局研究简表12 (SF-12)测量术前和治疗后2、6和12个月的生活质量,包括身体成分总结(PCS)和精神成分总结(MCS);肺癌治疗功能评估量表(FACT-LCS);患者健康问卷-4 (PHQ-4);抑郁/焦虑)。拟合局部加权平滑曲线,确定治疗后生活质量趋势的最佳区间结。建立了分段线性混合效应模型来估计基线、2个月和12个月生活质量评分和变化率的差异,调整了年龄、性别、种族、民族、吸烟状况、包年、结节大小/一致性、合并症和手术范围。结果该研究队列包括698例患者,其中458例(65.6%)接受了VATS, 240例(34.4%)接受了RATS。大鼠组在术后2个月表现出更明显的身体健康下降,但在12个月时表现出明显的恢复,与基线相比获得相似或略高的身体评分。随着时间的推移,两组之间的心理健康得分没有显著差异。两组都表现出一致的焦虑和抑郁得分,在2个月的时间里,焦虑症状有了显著改善。大鼠组术后并发症及转开胸较少。结论:对于早期非小细胞肺癌患者,RATS和VATS提供了相似的长期生活质量结果,尽管RATS患者可能会经历更剧烈的身体健康初期下降。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信