{"title":"A Conceptual Mapping Exercise of Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards in Residential & Community Care Using Hodges' Model and Threshold Concepts","authors":"Peter Jones","doi":"10.1111/jep.70085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Rationale</h3>\n \n <p>This article combines recent work on a generic model of care called ‘Hodges' Health Career—Care Domains—Model’ and the threshold concepts framework, with the issue of deprivation of liberty Safeguards. Created within higher education for health and social care, Hodges' model is used relationally with a practice-based emphasis to explore the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards in residential care.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims and Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>The context is long-term care for people living with learning disability, dementia and chronic physical health problems. That is, people unable to live in their own home (even with support) who are cared for in residential, and nursing homes and specialised/intensive care units. Hodges' model, which can also be described as a conceptual framework, is combined with threshold concepts to illustrate how deprivation of liberty safeguards can be integrated in theory and practice.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The study is descriptive and draws on the author's experience as a community mental health nurse for older adults and nursing home liaison. The emphasis is practice-based, adopting a conceptual mapping approach supported by discussion and literature.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Resources are provided and avenues for further and ongoing study are also given in conclusion.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","volume":"31 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jep.70085","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Rationale
This article combines recent work on a generic model of care called ‘Hodges' Health Career—Care Domains—Model’ and the threshold concepts framework, with the issue of deprivation of liberty Safeguards. Created within higher education for health and social care, Hodges' model is used relationally with a practice-based emphasis to explore the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards in residential care.
Aims and Objectives
The context is long-term care for people living with learning disability, dementia and chronic physical health problems. That is, people unable to live in their own home (even with support) who are cared for in residential, and nursing homes and specialised/intensive care units. Hodges' model, which can also be described as a conceptual framework, is combined with threshold concepts to illustrate how deprivation of liberty safeguards can be integrated in theory and practice.
Methods
The study is descriptive and draws on the author's experience as a community mental health nurse for older adults and nursing home liaison. The emphasis is practice-based, adopting a conceptual mapping approach supported by discussion and literature.
Conclusion
Resources are provided and avenues for further and ongoing study are also given in conclusion.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice aims to promote the evaluation and development of clinical practice across medicine, nursing and the allied health professions. All aspects of health services research and public health policy analysis and debate are of interest to the Journal whether studied from a population-based or individual patient-centred perspective. Of particular interest to the Journal are submissions on all aspects of clinical effectiveness and efficiency including evidence-based medicine, clinical practice guidelines, clinical decision making, clinical services organisation, implementation and delivery, health economic evaluation, health process and outcome measurement and new or improved methods (conceptual and statistical) for systematic inquiry into clinical practice. Papers may take a classical quantitative or qualitative approach to investigation (or may utilise both techniques) or may take the form of learned essays, structured/systematic reviews and critiques.