Late-orogenic retrograde zircon growth

IF 3.5 2区 地球科学 Q1 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
Sabastien C. Dyer, Ivan Edgeworth, Brian Kendall, Chris Yakymchuk
{"title":"Late-orogenic retrograde zircon growth","authors":"Sabastien C. Dyer,&nbsp;Ivan Edgeworth,&nbsp;Brian Kendall,&nbsp;Chris Yakymchuk","doi":"10.1007/s00410-025-02219-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Metamorphic zircon is commonly assumed to record growth during prograde or peak metamorphic conditions. However, numerical models of zircon predict growth during cooling. Linking the relative timing of zircon growth to a metamorphic evolution requires determining the potential zircon forming reactions during protracted metamorphic cycles. Meta-granitoids from the Grenville Province in Ontario contain a high proportion of igneous zircon with metamorphic rims that provide a rare opportunity to study zircon forming reactions in situ; acquiring U–Pb dates while maintaining their petrographic context and textural setting in thin section. Textures and trace element composition of major minerals indicate that metamorphic zircon grew as a result of melt crystallization and breakdown of titanomagnetite. Phase equilibrium modelling shows that these reactions occurred during retrograde metamorphism. Measured U–Pb dates of these retrograde metamorphic zircons are between ca. 1100 and 1070 Ma. This contradicts previous interpretations of regional geology that suggest prograde and peak metamorphism occurred between 1080 and 1050 Ma. These results highlight the need to carefully analyze the metamorphic textures of zircon to provide the necessary context to assess the zircon-forming reaction and its link to the pressure–temperature history of the rock. Without this context, pressure–temperature–time paths determined with zircon dates should be treated with caution and could be incorrectly linked to disparate stages of orogenic cycles.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":526,"journal":{"name":"Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology","volume":"180 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00410-025-02219-3.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00410-025-02219-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Metamorphic zircon is commonly assumed to record growth during prograde or peak metamorphic conditions. However, numerical models of zircon predict growth during cooling. Linking the relative timing of zircon growth to a metamorphic evolution requires determining the potential zircon forming reactions during protracted metamorphic cycles. Meta-granitoids from the Grenville Province in Ontario contain a high proportion of igneous zircon with metamorphic rims that provide a rare opportunity to study zircon forming reactions in situ; acquiring U–Pb dates while maintaining their petrographic context and textural setting in thin section. Textures and trace element composition of major minerals indicate that metamorphic zircon grew as a result of melt crystallization and breakdown of titanomagnetite. Phase equilibrium modelling shows that these reactions occurred during retrograde metamorphism. Measured U–Pb dates of these retrograde metamorphic zircons are between ca. 1100 and 1070 Ma. This contradicts previous interpretations of regional geology that suggest prograde and peak metamorphism occurred between 1080 and 1050 Ma. These results highlight the need to carefully analyze the metamorphic textures of zircon to provide the necessary context to assess the zircon-forming reaction and its link to the pressure–temperature history of the rock. Without this context, pressure–temperature–time paths determined with zircon dates should be treated with caution and could be incorrectly linked to disparate stages of orogenic cycles.

晚造山逆行锆石生长
变质锆石通常被认为记录了变质进阶或变质峰时期的生长。然而,锆石的数值模型预测了冷却过程中的生长。将锆石生长的相对时间与变质演化联系起来,需要确定在漫长的变质旋回中潜在的锆石形成反应。来自安大略省Grenville省的变质花岗岩类含有高比例的火成岩锆石和变质边缘,为原位研究锆石形成反应提供了难得的机会;获取U-Pb日期,同时保持薄片的岩石环境和结构背景。主要矿物的结构和微量元素组成表明,变质锆石是钛磁铁矿熔融结晶和破碎的结果。相平衡模型表明这些反应发生在逆行变质过程中。这些逆变质锆石的U-Pb测年在1100 ~ 1070 Ma之间。这与以前对区域地质的解释相矛盾,以前的解释认为,变质作用发生在1080 - 1050 Ma之间。这些结果强调了仔细分析锆石变质结构的必要性,以便为评估锆石形成反应及其与岩石压力-温度历史的联系提供必要的背景。如果没有这种背景,用锆石日期确定的压力-温度-时间路径应该谨慎对待,并且可能错误地将其与造山旋回的不同阶段联系起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology
Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
5.70%
发文量
94
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology is an international journal that accepts high quality research papers in the fields of igneous and metamorphic petrology, geochemistry and mineralogy. Topics of interest include: major element, trace element and isotope geochemistry, geochronology, experimental petrology, igneous and metamorphic petrology, mineralogy, major and trace element mineral chemistry and thermodynamic modeling of petrologic and geochemical processes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信