Emma C. Gargroetzi , Lynne M. Zummo , Alexandra R. Aguilar , Emma P. Bene
{"title":"Quantitative civic literacies: “Let’s talk about election 2020” and youth use of numbers in digital civic media","authors":"Emma C. Gargroetzi , Lynne M. Zummo , Alexandra R. Aguilar , Emma P. Bene","doi":"10.1016/j.jmathb.2025.101256","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Amid global turmoil, the mathematical demands of civic life and the civic demands of mathematics education are greater than ever. International goals of mathematics education include preparation for civic life. Curricula focused on receptive analytic activities, however, positions youth as underdeveloped civic actors needing preparation for responsible future participation rather than treating them as civic actors today. To better understand how youth use mathematics in their civic participation today, we conceptualize <em>quantitative civic literacies</em> as the practices of reinscribing quantitative information into civic participation. We investigate quantitative civic literacies in youth digital civic media about racial justice, the COVID-19 pandemic, and the climate crisis, drawing data from a US-based, public radio-hosted, digital media platform called <em>Let’s Talk about Election 2020</em>. Findings identified six quantitative civic literacies engaged by youth; youth used quantitative forms including counts and locations, relationship and change, and uncertainty in making civic arguments to (1) communicate the magnitude of an issue, (2) situate an issue in space or time, (3) reason about causation or propose a theory of change, (4) provide specificity through narrative detail, (5) make claims about identity, and (6) reveal injustice. Beyond providing logical argumentation and legitimacy, numbers were used by youth to activate empathy and mobilize ethical calls in attempts to move others to action. With these insights, we provide inroads for a mathematics education for civic life that builds on a more expansive understanding of the rhetorical potential of numbers and of youth as civic actors to nurture youth quantitative civic literacies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47481,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mathematical Behavior","volume":"79 ","pages":"Article 101256"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mathematical Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0732312325000203","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Amid global turmoil, the mathematical demands of civic life and the civic demands of mathematics education are greater than ever. International goals of mathematics education include preparation for civic life. Curricula focused on receptive analytic activities, however, positions youth as underdeveloped civic actors needing preparation for responsible future participation rather than treating them as civic actors today. To better understand how youth use mathematics in their civic participation today, we conceptualize quantitative civic literacies as the practices of reinscribing quantitative information into civic participation. We investigate quantitative civic literacies in youth digital civic media about racial justice, the COVID-19 pandemic, and the climate crisis, drawing data from a US-based, public radio-hosted, digital media platform called Let’s Talk about Election 2020. Findings identified six quantitative civic literacies engaged by youth; youth used quantitative forms including counts and locations, relationship and change, and uncertainty in making civic arguments to (1) communicate the magnitude of an issue, (2) situate an issue in space or time, (3) reason about causation or propose a theory of change, (4) provide specificity through narrative detail, (5) make claims about identity, and (6) reveal injustice. Beyond providing logical argumentation and legitimacy, numbers were used by youth to activate empathy and mobilize ethical calls in attempts to move others to action. With these insights, we provide inroads for a mathematics education for civic life that builds on a more expansive understanding of the rhetorical potential of numbers and of youth as civic actors to nurture youth quantitative civic literacies.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Mathematical Behavior solicits original research on the learning and teaching of mathematics. We are interested especially in basic research, research that aims to clarify, in detail and depth, how mathematical ideas develop in learners. Over three decades, our experience confirms a founding premise of this journal: that mathematical thinking, hence mathematics learning as a social enterprise, is special. It is special because mathematics is special, both logically and psychologically. Logically, through the way that mathematical ideas and methods have been built, refined and organized for centuries across a range of cultures; and psychologically, through the variety of ways people today, in many walks of life, make sense of mathematics, develop it, make it their own.