Maximum and minimum activity in inpatient adolescents with Bipolar Disorders: Daily-Variability classification of actigraphy pattern with artificial intelligence

Farzan Vahedifard , Boris Birmaher , Satish Iyengar , Maria Wolfe , Lepore Brianna N , Mariah Chobany , Halimah Abdul-waalee , Greeshma Malgireddy , Jonathan A. Hart , Michele A. Bertocci , Rasim S. Diler
{"title":"Maximum and minimum activity in inpatient adolescents with Bipolar Disorders: Daily-Variability classification of actigraphy pattern with artificial intelligence","authors":"Farzan Vahedifard ,&nbsp;Boris Birmaher ,&nbsp;Satish Iyengar ,&nbsp;Maria Wolfe ,&nbsp;Lepore Brianna N ,&nbsp;Mariah Chobany ,&nbsp;Halimah Abdul-waalee ,&nbsp;Greeshma Malgireddy ,&nbsp;Jonathan A. Hart ,&nbsp;Michele A. Bertocci ,&nbsp;Rasim S. Diler","doi":"10.1016/j.psycom.2025.100212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Measures of daily activity may be objective markers to help differentiate adolescent bipolar disorder (BD). We used chart reviewed actigraphy data collected from 2014 to 2023, and AI methods to classify well-characterized inpatient adolescents diagnosed with <em>BD-without-attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD</em>), <em>BD-with-ADHD</em>, <em>ADHD-without-BD</em>, and other diagnoses (<em>OD</em>). 389 inpatient adolescents (232 female, mean age 15.07), wore an actigraphy monitor for the duration of their inpatient stay (mean number of unique days = 13.04 days). Activity was characterized into four 60-min maximum and minimum daily activity bins, automatically identified using a novel Python script. Feature engineering further described time-series data. 5193 days of data were split into training and testing sets. Random Forest and XGBoost models were trained with cross-validation on the training set and model metrics were compared. The best models were tested on the testing set. XGBoost with feature selection provided the most robust and balanced classification model. The most influential feature was the engineered difference between peak active hours, which along with other activity and age features classified all diagnostic groups with 91.5 % accuracy. Results indicated that daily activity levels, especially the variability between peak activity hours, showed potential for improving diagnostic precision in psychiatric settings. Actigraphy, combined with machine learning, offers a promising approach for classifying diagnostic groups among inpatient adolescent populations and engineered maximum and minimum hourly activity features may provide objective markers to improve diagnostic accuracy. Future studies should aim to test and validate these findings and assess their clinical implications in larger, diverse cohorts in the natural environment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74595,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatry research communications","volume":"5 2","pages":"Article 100212"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatry research communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277259872500011X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Measures of daily activity may be objective markers to help differentiate adolescent bipolar disorder (BD). We used chart reviewed actigraphy data collected from 2014 to 2023, and AI methods to classify well-characterized inpatient adolescents diagnosed with BD-without-attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), BD-with-ADHD, ADHD-without-BD, and other diagnoses (OD). 389 inpatient adolescents (232 female, mean age 15.07), wore an actigraphy monitor for the duration of their inpatient stay (mean number of unique days = 13.04 days). Activity was characterized into four 60-min maximum and minimum daily activity bins, automatically identified using a novel Python script. Feature engineering further described time-series data. 5193 days of data were split into training and testing sets. Random Forest and XGBoost models were trained with cross-validation on the training set and model metrics were compared. The best models were tested on the testing set. XGBoost with feature selection provided the most robust and balanced classification model. The most influential feature was the engineered difference between peak active hours, which along with other activity and age features classified all diagnostic groups with 91.5 % accuracy. Results indicated that daily activity levels, especially the variability between peak activity hours, showed potential for improving diagnostic precision in psychiatric settings. Actigraphy, combined with machine learning, offers a promising approach for classifying diagnostic groups among inpatient adolescent populations and engineered maximum and minimum hourly activity features may provide objective markers to improve diagnostic accuracy. Future studies should aim to test and validate these findings and assess their clinical implications in larger, diverse cohorts in the natural environment.

Abstract Image

住院青少年双相情感障碍患者的最大和最小活动:人工智能活动图模式的每日变异性分类
日常活动的测量可能是帮助区分青少年双相情感障碍(BD)的客观标志。我们使用2014年至2023年收集的活动图数据,并使用人工智能方法对被诊断为无注意缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)、有注意缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)、有注意缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)和其他诊断(OD)的住院青少年进行分类。389名青少年住院患者(232名女性,平均年龄15.07岁)在住院期间(平均独立天数= 13.04天)佩戴活动监测仪。活动被分为四个60分钟的最大和最小每日活动箱,使用一种新的Python脚本自动识别。特征工程进一步描述了时间序列数据。5193天的数据被分成训练集和测试集。随机森林和XGBoost模型在训练集上进行交叉验证,并比较模型指标。在测试集上对最佳模型进行测试。带有特征选择的XGBoost提供了最稳健和平衡的分类模型。最具影响力的特征是峰值活动时间之间的工程差异,它与其他活动和年龄特征一起分类所有诊断组,准确率为91.5%。结果表明,日常活动水平,特别是高峰活动时间之间的变化,显示出在精神病学设置中提高诊断准确性的潜力。与机器学习相结合的活动记录仪为在住院青少年人群中分类诊断组提供了一种很有前途的方法,设计的最大和最小小时活动特征可以提供客观标记,以提高诊断准确性。未来的研究应旨在测试和验证这些发现,并在自然环境中更大、更多样化的队列中评估其临床意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychiatry research communications
Psychiatry research communications Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
77 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信