Local Resection After Cesarean Delivery for Placenta Accreta Spectrum Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Shinya Matsuzaki,Brett D Einerson,Loic Sentilhes,Baha M Sibai,George R Saade,Antonio F Saad,Kazuya Mimura,Satoko Matsuzaki,Alexandre Buckley de Meritens,Sebastian R Hobson,Joseph G Ouzounian,Robert M Silver,Jason D Wright,Koji Matsuo
{"title":"Local Resection After Cesarean Delivery for Placenta Accreta Spectrum Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Shinya Matsuzaki,Brett D Einerson,Loic Sentilhes,Baha M Sibai,George R Saade,Antonio F Saad,Kazuya Mimura,Satoko Matsuzaki,Alexandre Buckley de Meritens,Sebastian R Hobson,Joseph G Ouzounian,Robert M Silver,Jason D Wright,Koji Matsuo","doi":"10.1097/aog.0000000000005921","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\r\nTo compare maternal and surgical outcomes between local resection and immediate hysterectomy after cesarean delivery in patients with placenta accreta spectrum.\r\n\r\nDATA SOURCES\r\nFour public databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) were systematically searched for relevant publications up to July 31, 2024. Because the Cochrane Library included all the identified clinical trials, it was unnecessary to search ClinicalTrials.gov. The search strategy included the terms \"placenta accreta\" or \"placenta accreta spectrum\" and \"pregnancy outcomes\" and related key words about local resection and cesarean hysterectomy.\r\n\r\nMETHODS OF STUDY SELECTION\r\nWith the use of established inclusion criteria, 4,889 studies were reviewed. The included studies evaluated surgical and maternal outcomes associated with immediate hysterectomy compared with local resection.\r\n\r\nTABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS\r\nData extraction was conducted with the Patient/Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome, and Study design framework. Both fixed-effects and random-effects models were used to synthesize the findings. A total of 11 studies published between 2018 and 2024 were analyzed (nine retrospective studies, one randomized controlled trial, and one prospective cohort study). The quality of the included studies was globally low, and 7 of 11 studies had severe bias. The immediate hysterectomy group had a significantly higher prevalence of placenta percreta compared with the local resection group (69.4% vs 44.3%, P<.01). In contrast to immediate hysterectomy, local resection yielded improved surgical outcomes, demonstrated by the following metrics: transfusion rate (six studies, 375 vs 205 patients, odds ratio [OR] 0.47, 95% CI, 0.29-0.75), estimated blood loss (seven studies, 416 vs 246 patients, mean difference -396 mL, 95% CI, -534 to -257), urologic complications (seven studies, 408 vs 241 patients, OR 0.18, 95% CI, 0.10-0.33), and intensive care unit admission (three studies, 87 vs 79 patients, OR 0.19, 95% CI, 0.07-0.53). One study recorded three maternal deaths: two in the immediate hysterectomy group and one in the local resection group. The results of subgroup analyses focused on patients with severe forms of placenta accreta spectrum (placenta increta and percreta) were similar in the overall analysis.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nIn this systematic review and meta-analysis, eligible studies comparing the local resection with immediate hysterectomy at cesarean hysterectomy for placenta accreta spectrum were overall low quality because of the lack of intention-to-treat information. Despite these limitations, local resection for placenta accreta spectrum may possibly be an option for appropriately selected patients to reduce surgical morbidity. Because the indication criteria, safety, surgical techniques, and necessity of adjunctive therapies for local resection remain understudied, further prospective studies are warranted.\r\n\r\nSYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION\r\nPROSPERO, CRD42024594315.","PeriodicalId":19483,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and gynecology","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obstetrics and gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000005921","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To compare maternal and surgical outcomes between local resection and immediate hysterectomy after cesarean delivery in patients with placenta accreta spectrum. DATA SOURCES Four public databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) were systematically searched for relevant publications up to July 31, 2024. Because the Cochrane Library included all the identified clinical trials, it was unnecessary to search ClinicalTrials.gov. The search strategy included the terms "placenta accreta" or "placenta accreta spectrum" and "pregnancy outcomes" and related key words about local resection and cesarean hysterectomy. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION With the use of established inclusion criteria, 4,889 studies were reviewed. The included studies evaluated surgical and maternal outcomes associated with immediate hysterectomy compared with local resection. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS Data extraction was conducted with the Patient/Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome, and Study design framework. Both fixed-effects and random-effects models were used to synthesize the findings. A total of 11 studies published between 2018 and 2024 were analyzed (nine retrospective studies, one randomized controlled trial, and one prospective cohort study). The quality of the included studies was globally low, and 7 of 11 studies had severe bias. The immediate hysterectomy group had a significantly higher prevalence of placenta percreta compared with the local resection group (69.4% vs 44.3%, P<.01). In contrast to immediate hysterectomy, local resection yielded improved surgical outcomes, demonstrated by the following metrics: transfusion rate (six studies, 375 vs 205 patients, odds ratio [OR] 0.47, 95% CI, 0.29-0.75), estimated blood loss (seven studies, 416 vs 246 patients, mean difference -396 mL, 95% CI, -534 to -257), urologic complications (seven studies, 408 vs 241 patients, OR 0.18, 95% CI, 0.10-0.33), and intensive care unit admission (three studies, 87 vs 79 patients, OR 0.19, 95% CI, 0.07-0.53). One study recorded three maternal deaths: two in the immediate hysterectomy group and one in the local resection group. The results of subgroup analyses focused on patients with severe forms of placenta accreta spectrum (placenta increta and percreta) were similar in the overall analysis. CONCLUSION In this systematic review and meta-analysis, eligible studies comparing the local resection with immediate hysterectomy at cesarean hysterectomy for placenta accreta spectrum were overall low quality because of the lack of intention-to-treat information. Despite these limitations, local resection for placenta accreta spectrum may possibly be an option for appropriately selected patients to reduce surgical morbidity. Because the indication criteria, safety, surgical techniques, and necessity of adjunctive therapies for local resection remain understudied, further prospective studies are warranted. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION PROSPERO, CRD42024594315.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Obstetrics and gynecology
Obstetrics and gynecology 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
11.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
867
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: "Obstetrics & Gynecology," affectionately known as "The Green Journal," is the official publication of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG). Since its inception in 1953, the journal has been dedicated to advancing the clinical practice of obstetrics and gynecology, as well as related fields. The journal's mission is to promote excellence in these areas by publishing a diverse range of articles that cover translational and clinical topics. "Obstetrics & Gynecology" provides a platform for the dissemination of evidence-based research, clinical guidelines, and expert opinions that are essential for the continuous improvement of women's health care. The journal's content is designed to inform and educate obstetricians, gynecologists, and other healthcare professionals, ensuring that they stay abreast of the latest developments and best practices in their field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信