Assessing the Need for Additional Syndesmotic Stabilization in Open Reduction of the Posterior Malleolus: A Biomechanical Study.

Alexander Milstrey,Stella Gartung,Matthias Klimek,Jens Wermers,Michael J Raschke,Sabine Ochman
{"title":"Assessing the Need for Additional Syndesmotic Stabilization in Open Reduction of the Posterior Malleolus: A Biomechanical Study.","authors":"Alexander Milstrey,Stella Gartung,Matthias Klimek,Jens Wermers,Michael J Raschke,Sabine Ochman","doi":"10.2106/jbjs.23.01088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nThe treatment of ankle fractures involving the posterior malleolus (PM) has changed in favor of open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), and the need for additional syndesmotic stabilization has decreased; however, there are still doubts regarding the diagnosis and treatment of residual syndesmotic instability. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of fixation of the PM and to assess the need for additional stabilization methods. We hypothesized that ORIF of the PM would not sufficiently stabilize the syndesmosis and that additional syndesmotic reconstruction would restore kinematics.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nEight unpaired, fresh-frozen, cadaveric lower legs were tested in a 6-degrees-of-freedom robotic arm with constant loading (200 N) in the neutral position and at 10° dorsiflexion, 15° plantar flexion, and 30° plantar flexion. The specimens were evaluated in the following order: intact state; osteotomy of the PM; transection of the anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament (AITFL) and interosseous ligament (IOL); ORIF of the PM; additional syndesmotic screw; combination of syndesmotic screw and AITFL augmentation; and AITFL augmentation.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nA complete simulated rupture of the syndesmosis (PM osteotomy with AITFL and IOL transection) caused translational (6.9 mm posterior and 1.8 mm medial displacement) and rotational instability (5.5° external rotation) of the distal fibula. ORIF of the PM could eliminate this instability in the neutral ankle position, whereas sagittal and rotational instability remained in dorsiflexion and plantar flexion. The remaining instability could be eliminated with an additional procedure, without notable differences between screw and AITFL augmentation.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nIn our model, isolated PM osteotomy and isolated AITFL and IOL rupture (after PM refixation) only partially increased fibular motion in dorsiflexion and plantar flexion, whereas the combination of PM osteotomy and AITFL and IOL rupture resulted in an unstable syndesmosis in all planes.\r\n\r\nCLINICAL RELEVANCE\r\nIn complex ankle fractures, ORIF of the PM is essential to restore syndesmotic stability; however, residual syndesmotic instability can be detected by a specific posterior shift of the fibula on stress testing. In these cases, anatomical AITFL augmentation is biomechanically equivalent to the use of a syndesmotic screw.","PeriodicalId":22625,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.23.01088","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND The treatment of ankle fractures involving the posterior malleolus (PM) has changed in favor of open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), and the need for additional syndesmotic stabilization has decreased; however, there are still doubts regarding the diagnosis and treatment of residual syndesmotic instability. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of fixation of the PM and to assess the need for additional stabilization methods. We hypothesized that ORIF of the PM would not sufficiently stabilize the syndesmosis and that additional syndesmotic reconstruction would restore kinematics. METHODS Eight unpaired, fresh-frozen, cadaveric lower legs were tested in a 6-degrees-of-freedom robotic arm with constant loading (200 N) in the neutral position and at 10° dorsiflexion, 15° plantar flexion, and 30° plantar flexion. The specimens were evaluated in the following order: intact state; osteotomy of the PM; transection of the anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament (AITFL) and interosseous ligament (IOL); ORIF of the PM; additional syndesmotic screw; combination of syndesmotic screw and AITFL augmentation; and AITFL augmentation. RESULTS A complete simulated rupture of the syndesmosis (PM osteotomy with AITFL and IOL transection) caused translational (6.9 mm posterior and 1.8 mm medial displacement) and rotational instability (5.5° external rotation) of the distal fibula. ORIF of the PM could eliminate this instability in the neutral ankle position, whereas sagittal and rotational instability remained in dorsiflexion and plantar flexion. The remaining instability could be eliminated with an additional procedure, without notable differences between screw and AITFL augmentation. CONCLUSIONS In our model, isolated PM osteotomy and isolated AITFL and IOL rupture (after PM refixation) only partially increased fibular motion in dorsiflexion and plantar flexion, whereas the combination of PM osteotomy and AITFL and IOL rupture resulted in an unstable syndesmosis in all planes. CLINICAL RELEVANCE In complex ankle fractures, ORIF of the PM is essential to restore syndesmotic stability; however, residual syndesmotic instability can be detected by a specific posterior shift of the fibula on stress testing. In these cases, anatomical AITFL augmentation is biomechanically equivalent to the use of a syndesmotic screw.
一项生物力学研究:评估后踝切开复位需要额外的关节联合稳定。
背景:累及后踝(PM)的踝关节骨折的治疗已经改变,倾向于切开复位内固定(ORIF),并且需要额外的韧带联合稳定已经减少;然而,对于残余胫韧带不稳定的诊断和治疗仍存在疑问。本研究的目的是评估PM固定的效果,并评估是否需要额外的稳定方法。我们假设PM的ORIF不能充分稳定联合,额外的联合重建可以恢复运动学。方法将8条未配对的新鲜冷冻尸体下肢置于6自由度机械臂中,恒定载荷(200 N),分别在10°背屈、15°足底屈和30°足底屈位置进行测试。按以下顺序对标本进行评估:完好状态;PM截骨术;胫腓前下韧带(AITFL)和骨间韧带(IOL)横断;总理ORIF;附加胫腓联合螺钉;联合椎间联合螺钉和AITFL增强术;和AITFL增强。结果tsa完全模拟韧带联合破裂(PM截骨+ AITFL + IOL横断)导致腓骨远端移位(后侧移位6.9 mm,内侧移位1.8 mm)和旋转不稳定(外旋5.5°)。PM的ORIF可以消除中立踝关节位置的不稳定性,而背屈和足底屈时矢状和旋转不稳定性仍然存在。剩余的不稳定性可以通过额外的手术消除,螺钉和AITFL增强之间没有显着差异。结论在我们的模型中,单独的PM截骨和单独的AITFL和IOL破裂(PM再固定后)仅部分增加了背屈和足底屈曲的腓骨运动,而PM截骨和AITFL和IOL破裂联合导致所有平面的不稳定联合。临床意义在复杂的踝关节骨折中,PM的ORIF对于恢复关节联合稳定性至关重要;然而,残余的骨联合不稳定可以通过腓骨的特定后移位在压力测试中检测到。在这些病例中,解剖学上的AITFL增强在生物力学上等同于使用联合螺钉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信