Speech–Language Pathologists’ Perceptions of Their Competence in Managing Stuttering: A Systematic Review with Narrative Synthesis

IF 1.5 3区 医学 Q2 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Emma Alegre, Adriana Penman, Rachael Unicomb, Nerina Scarinci
{"title":"Speech–Language Pathologists’ Perceptions of Their Competence in Managing Stuttering: A Systematic Review with Narrative Synthesis","authors":"Emma Alegre,&nbsp;Adriana Penman,&nbsp;Rachael Unicomb,&nbsp;Nerina Scarinci","doi":"10.1111/1460-6984.70040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Stuttering can significantly impact an individual's quality of life and has the potential to affect social interactions, academic and career opportunities, and well-being. Speech–language pathologists (SLPs) play a crucial role in the treatment of stuttering across the lifespan.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims</h3>\n \n <p>This systematic review aimed to describe (1) how competent SLPs perceive themselves to be in their management of stuttering and (2) the factors that influence SLPs’ perceived competence in managing stuttering.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A comprehensive search of eight electronic databases resulted in 13 studies that met the inclusion criteria. A narrative synthesis was completed on the extracted data.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main Contribution</h3>\n \n <p>Competence was perceived to be lower in treatment than in assessment. Perceived competence was higher in SLPs who saw people who stutter more frequently and engaged in more continuing professional education in stuttering. Factors affecting SLPs’ perceived competence also included: the level of support to implement treatment, knowledge of stuttering, formal education in stuttering, years of experience as an SLP, experiences with stuttering, familiarity with people who stutter, previous treatment outcomes and the perceived complexity of stuttering. The available data were primarily focused on participants working in paediatric populations.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The review revealed diversity in perceived competence when managing stuttering, influenced by factors related to SLPs’ professional and personal experiences, the practice context and available evidence, with notable variation in competence across different settings and regions. Further research is required across the lifespan to better understand the relationships between factors and to guide future interventions for competence.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS</h3>\n \n <p><i>What is already known on the subject</i></p>\n \n <div>\n <ul>\n \n <li>Research has identified gaps in SLPs’ knowledge, clinical experience and confidence in treating stuttering. These studies highlighted SLPs’ limited awareness of effective interventions, varying levels of perceived competence across different age groups, low preference for treating stuttering and difficulty applying clinical trial evidence. This study was needed to consolidate these findings and examine factors influencing SLPs’ perceived competence in stuttering management.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n \n <p><i>What this paper adds to the existing knowledge</i></p>\n \n <div>\n <ul>\n \n <li>This review provides a synthesis of SLPs’ perceptions of their competency in managing stuttering and identifies key factors influencing competency. It details perceived competence of stuttering treatment across the lifespan, in assessment and treatment. Additionally, it explores factors such as experience with stuttering, level of support, the practice context, familiarity with people who stutter, the perceived complexity of stuttering and previous treatment outcomes. These findings have implications for stuttering treatment and guiding professional development.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n \n <p><i>What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work?</i></p>\n \n <div>\n <ul>\n \n <li>The findings of this review emphasise the importance of ongoing education and support for SLPs to enhance their clinical competence in stuttering management. Specifically, targeted professional development, supportive work environments and familiarity with people who stutter can positively impact SLPs’ confidence and proficiency. The results reinforced the need for SLPs whose caseloads include stuttering to prioritise ongoing education in stuttering, seek support to implement treatment where needed and pursue opportunities to gain experience with people who stutter. These insights can inform the development of guidelines and training programmes to improve SLPs’ competence and ultimately benefit people who stutter.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":49182,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders","volume":"60 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1460-6984.70040","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1460-6984.70040","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Stuttering can significantly impact an individual's quality of life and has the potential to affect social interactions, academic and career opportunities, and well-being. Speech–language pathologists (SLPs) play a crucial role in the treatment of stuttering across the lifespan.

Aims

This systematic review aimed to describe (1) how competent SLPs perceive themselves to be in their management of stuttering and (2) the factors that influence SLPs’ perceived competence in managing stuttering.

Methods

A comprehensive search of eight electronic databases resulted in 13 studies that met the inclusion criteria. A narrative synthesis was completed on the extracted data.

Main Contribution

Competence was perceived to be lower in treatment than in assessment. Perceived competence was higher in SLPs who saw people who stutter more frequently and engaged in more continuing professional education in stuttering. Factors affecting SLPs’ perceived competence also included: the level of support to implement treatment, knowledge of stuttering, formal education in stuttering, years of experience as an SLP, experiences with stuttering, familiarity with people who stutter, previous treatment outcomes and the perceived complexity of stuttering. The available data were primarily focused on participants working in paediatric populations.

Conclusions

The review revealed diversity in perceived competence when managing stuttering, influenced by factors related to SLPs’ professional and personal experiences, the practice context and available evidence, with notable variation in competence across different settings and regions. Further research is required across the lifespan to better understand the relationships between factors and to guide future interventions for competence.

WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS

What is already known on the subject

  • Research has identified gaps in SLPs’ knowledge, clinical experience and confidence in treating stuttering. These studies highlighted SLPs’ limited awareness of effective interventions, varying levels of perceived competence across different age groups, low preference for treating stuttering and difficulty applying clinical trial evidence. This study was needed to consolidate these findings and examine factors influencing SLPs’ perceived competence in stuttering management.

What this paper adds to the existing knowledge

  • This review provides a synthesis of SLPs’ perceptions of their competency in managing stuttering and identifies key factors influencing competency. It details perceived competence of stuttering treatment across the lifespan, in assessment and treatment. Additionally, it explores factors such as experience with stuttering, level of support, the practice context, familiarity with people who stutter, the perceived complexity of stuttering and previous treatment outcomes. These findings have implications for stuttering treatment and guiding professional development.

What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work?

  • The findings of this review emphasise the importance of ongoing education and support for SLPs to enhance their clinical competence in stuttering management. Specifically, targeted professional development, supportive work environments and familiarity with people who stutter can positively impact SLPs’ confidence and proficiency. The results reinforced the need for SLPs whose caseloads include stuttering to prioritise ongoing education in stuttering, seek support to implement treatment where needed and pursue opportunities to gain experience with people who stutter. These insights can inform the development of guidelines and training programmes to improve SLPs’ competence and ultimately benefit people who stutter.

Abstract Image

语言病理学家对其处理口吃能力的认知:基于叙事综合的系统回顾
口吃会严重影响一个人的生活质量,并有可能影响社会交往、学业和职业机会以及幸福感。语言病理学家(slp)在口吃的治疗中起着至关重要的作用。本系统综述旨在描述:(1)有能力的特殊语言教师如何看待自己在口吃管理方面的能力;(2)影响特殊语言教师管理口吃能力的因素。方法对8个电子数据库进行综合检索,获得13篇符合纳入标准的文献。对提取的数据进行叙事综合。主要贡献能力在治疗中被认为比在评估中更低。那些看到口吃更频繁的人并且在口吃方面接受了更多持续专业教育的slp,他们的感知能力更高。影响口吃儿童感知能力的因素还包括:对实施口吃治疗的支持水平、对口吃的了解、接受过的正规口吃教育、作为口吃儿童的经验年限、口吃经历、对口吃者的熟悉程度、以前的治疗结果以及感知口吃的复杂性。现有数据主要集中于在儿科人群中工作的参与者。结论本研究发现,在处理口吃时,语言教师的感知能力存在差异,受其专业和个人经历、实践环境和现有证据等因素的影响,在不同环境和地区,能力存在显著差异。需要在整个生命周期中进行进一步的研究,以更好地了解因素之间的关系,并指导未来对能力的干预。这篇论文补充了关于这一课题的已知情况。研究已经确定了在治疗口吃方面,slp的知识、临床经验和信心方面存在差距。这些研究强调了口吃儿童对有效干预措施的认识有限,不同年龄组的认知能力水平不一,对治疗口吃的偏好较低,以及难以应用临床试验证据。本研究需要巩固这些发现,并检查影响特殊语言儿童口吃管理感知能力的因素。本研究综述了小学生对其口吃管理能力的认知,并确定了影响口吃能力的关键因素。它详细说明了在整个生命周期中,在评估和治疗中口吃治疗的感知能力。此外,它还探讨了诸如口吃经历、支持水平、实践环境、对口吃者的熟悉程度、对口吃的感知复杂性和以前的治疗结果等因素。这些发现对口吃治疗和指导专业发展具有启示意义。这项工作的潜在或实际临床意义是什么?本综述的研究结果强调了持续教育和支持口吃儿童的重要性,以提高他们在口吃管理方面的临床能力。具体来说,有针对性的专业发展、支持性的工作环境和对口吃者的熟悉可以积极影响口吃者的信心和熟练程度。研究结果表明,有口吃病例的特殊服务提供者需要优先考虑口吃方面的持续教育,在需要时寻求支持以实施治疗,并寻求机会获得与口吃者打交道的经验。这些见解可以为制定指导方针和培训计划提供信息,以提高口吃者的能力,并最终使口吃者受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders
International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
116
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders (IJLCD) is the official journal of the Royal College of Speech & Language Therapists. The Journal welcomes submissions on all aspects of speech, language, communication disorders and speech and language therapy. It provides a forum for the exchange of information and discussion of issues of clinical or theoretical relevance in the above areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信