Mentors and sponsors: Making a difference for racially and culturally minoritised academics in Australian universities

IF 2 2区 社会学 Q2 SOCIAL ISSUES
Kathomi Gatwiri, Zoë Krupka, Samara James
{"title":"Mentors and sponsors: Making a difference for racially and culturally minoritised academics in Australian universities","authors":"Kathomi Gatwiri,&nbsp;Zoë Krupka,&nbsp;Samara James","doi":"10.1002/ajs4.360","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Mentorship and sponsorships play a significant role in faculty experiences, career trajectories, well-being and academic success in higher education. In this study, 23 racially and culturally minoritised (RACM) academics were interviewed about their experiences working in Australian universities, and all spoke about the key importance of their mentoring experiences. Mentorship was understood as both enabling and constricting, with unspoken rules of conduct and an embedded hierarchical relationship that could perpetuate the exclusion of both marginalised scholars and scholarship. In this paper, the theory of practice architectures, part of a wider ‘practice turn’ within education and the social sciences, was used to conceptualise the qualitative analysis of how mentoring arrangements are experienced by RACM academics in Australian universities. Here, we view academic mentoring as a social architectural practice whose power is articulated in discursive, material-economic and social-political arrangements and enacted through language (<i>sayings</i>), actions (<i>doings</i>) and relationships (<i>relatings</i>). This study offers insight not only into the structural and experiential landscape of mentoring for RACM academics but also provides an opportunity to envision pathways for its transformation.</p>","PeriodicalId":46787,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Social Issues","volume":"60 1","pages":"75-93"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ajs4.360","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Social Issues","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajs4.360","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mentorship and sponsorships play a significant role in faculty experiences, career trajectories, well-being and academic success in higher education. In this study, 23 racially and culturally minoritised (RACM) academics were interviewed about their experiences working in Australian universities, and all spoke about the key importance of their mentoring experiences. Mentorship was understood as both enabling and constricting, with unspoken rules of conduct and an embedded hierarchical relationship that could perpetuate the exclusion of both marginalised scholars and scholarship. In this paper, the theory of practice architectures, part of a wider ‘practice turn’ within education and the social sciences, was used to conceptualise the qualitative analysis of how mentoring arrangements are experienced by RACM academics in Australian universities. Here, we view academic mentoring as a social architectural practice whose power is articulated in discursive, material-economic and social-political arrangements and enacted through language (sayings), actions (doings) and relationships (relatings). This study offers insight not only into the structural and experiential landscape of mentoring for RACM academics but also provides an opportunity to envision pathways for its transformation.

Abstract Image

在高等教育中,导师和赞助对教师的经历、职业发展轨迹、幸福感和学术成功起着重要作用。在这项研究中,23 名种族和文化上属于少数群体(RACM)的学者接受了关于他们在澳大利亚大学工作经历的访谈,他们都谈到了指导经历的重要性。人们认为,导师制既是一种扶持,也是一种束缚,其潜移默化的行为规则和内在的等级关系可能会使边缘化学者和学术研究长期受到排斥。在本文中,作为教育和社会科学中更广泛的 "实践转向 "的一部分,实践架构理论被用于对澳大利亚大学中的 RACM 学者如何体验指导安排的定性分析进行概念化。在此,我们将学术指导视为一种社会建筑实践,其权力在话语、物质经济和社会政治安排中得到阐述,并通过语言(说)、行动(做)和关系(relatings)得以实现。这项研究不仅为了解 RACM 学术界指导工作的结构和经验状况提供了洞察力,还为设想指导工作的转型途径提供了机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
4.00%
发文量
45
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信