{"title":"Cognition from genes to ecology: individual differences incognition and its potential role in a social network","authors":"Brian H. Smith","doi":"10.1007/s10071-025-01951-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>There have now been many reports of intra-colony differences in how individuals learn on a variety of conditioning tasks in both honey bees and bumble bees. Yet the fundamental mechanistic and adaptive bases for this variation have yet to be fully described. This review summarizes a long series of investigations with the honey bee (<i>Apis mellifera</i>) that had the objective of describing the factors that contribute to this variation. Selection on haploid drones for extremes in learning performance revealed that genotype accounted for much of the variance. Neither age nor behavioral caste consistently accounted for observed variation on different conditioning protocols until genotype was controlled. Two subsequent Quantitative Trait Locus mapping studies identified a locus in the honey bee genome with a significant effect on the learning phenotype. Pharmacological and reverse genetic approaches, combined with neurophysiological analyses, confirmed that a biogenic amine receptor for tyramine affects expression of the trait. This work allowed for development of a hypothetical model of how that receptor functions in the brain to produce broad pleiotropic effects on behavior. Subsequent work used genotype as a treatment condition for evaluation of the variation under quasi-natural conditions, which revealed that individual variation reflects how foragers weigh known and novel resources in decision making. This work, together with other studies of individual differences, suggests a unifying framework for understanding how and why individuals differ in cognitive abilities.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7879,"journal":{"name":"Animal Cognition","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10071-025-01951-4.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10071-025-01951-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
There have now been many reports of intra-colony differences in how individuals learn on a variety of conditioning tasks in both honey bees and bumble bees. Yet the fundamental mechanistic and adaptive bases for this variation have yet to be fully described. This review summarizes a long series of investigations with the honey bee (Apis mellifera) that had the objective of describing the factors that contribute to this variation. Selection on haploid drones for extremes in learning performance revealed that genotype accounted for much of the variance. Neither age nor behavioral caste consistently accounted for observed variation on different conditioning protocols until genotype was controlled. Two subsequent Quantitative Trait Locus mapping studies identified a locus in the honey bee genome with a significant effect on the learning phenotype. Pharmacological and reverse genetic approaches, combined with neurophysiological analyses, confirmed that a biogenic amine receptor for tyramine affects expression of the trait. This work allowed for development of a hypothetical model of how that receptor functions in the brain to produce broad pleiotropic effects on behavior. Subsequent work used genotype as a treatment condition for evaluation of the variation under quasi-natural conditions, which revealed that individual variation reflects how foragers weigh known and novel resources in decision making. This work, together with other studies of individual differences, suggests a unifying framework for understanding how and why individuals differ in cognitive abilities.
期刊介绍:
Animal Cognition is an interdisciplinary journal offering current research from many disciplines (ethology, behavioral ecology, animal behavior and learning, cognitive sciences, comparative psychology and evolutionary psychology) on all aspects of animal (and human) cognition in an evolutionary framework.
Animal Cognition publishes original empirical and theoretical work, reviews, methods papers, short communications and correspondence on the mechanisms and evolution of biologically rooted cognitive-intellectual structures.
The journal explores animal time perception and use; causality detection; innate reaction patterns and innate bases of learning; numerical competence and frequency expectancies; symbol use; communication; problem solving, animal thinking and use of tools, and the modularity of the mind.