Perceptions of ulnar collateral ligament injury in the online baseball community

Q4 Medicine
Gabriel C. Lane BS , Alicia M. Hymel MS , Eric N. Bowman MD, MPH
{"title":"Perceptions of ulnar collateral ligament injury in the online baseball community","authors":"Gabriel C. Lane BS ,&nbsp;Alicia M. Hymel MS ,&nbsp;Eric N. Bowman MD, MPH","doi":"10.1016/j.xrrt.2024.12.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and Hypothesis</h3><div>The incidence of medial elbow ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) injuries is increasing in youth athletes with minimal data available regarding perception of these injuries within the baseball community. The purpose of this study was to define the baseline knowledge of the online baseball community regarding UCL injuries, and secondarily to evaluate a short educational intervention to increase understanding regarding UCL injuries.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Participants were recruited through baseball-focused online discussion platforms over a 7-month period. A 15-question survey was administered to evaluate the primary outcome, assessing the online baseball community’s perception of UCL anatomy, function, surgical indications, risks, and outcomes. An evidence-based 5-minute educational video and handout were then provided. A postintervention survey was administered to evaluate the secondary outcome. Demographic data were collected, and analysis of variance was used to assess between-subject differences. Repeated-measures analysis of variances compared preintervention and postintervention accuracy.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The primary survey was completed by 347 individuals. Most participants classified themselves as former athletes or fans (62%). Areas of misconceptions were identified pertaining to risk factors for injury (58.8% answered incorrectly) and postoperative outcomes (64.8% answered incorrectly). Only 41% of respondents, including 34% of coaches, correctly identified pitch counts as an appropriate means of reducing UCL injury risk. Baseline knowledge was relatively high (&gt;90%) for basic anatomy and function. Respondents’ accuracy increased significantly (<em>P</em> &lt; .05) from 75.3% to 85.6% following the educational intervention. No statistical differences were found between demographic subgroups.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Misperceptions regarding UCL injury and management are prevalent within the online baseball community. Misperceptions regarding risk factors for injury were especially profound among those who identified as coaches, indicating opportunity for more targeted educational interventions. Further initiatives should be pursued to educate the baseball community regarding UCL injuries and management.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74030,"journal":{"name":"JSES reviews, reports, and techniques","volume":"5 2","pages":"Pages 182-185"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JSES reviews, reports, and techniques","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666639125000173","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Hypothesis

The incidence of medial elbow ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) injuries is increasing in youth athletes with minimal data available regarding perception of these injuries within the baseball community. The purpose of this study was to define the baseline knowledge of the online baseball community regarding UCL injuries, and secondarily to evaluate a short educational intervention to increase understanding regarding UCL injuries.

Methods

Participants were recruited through baseball-focused online discussion platforms over a 7-month period. A 15-question survey was administered to evaluate the primary outcome, assessing the online baseball community’s perception of UCL anatomy, function, surgical indications, risks, and outcomes. An evidence-based 5-minute educational video and handout were then provided. A postintervention survey was administered to evaluate the secondary outcome. Demographic data were collected, and analysis of variance was used to assess between-subject differences. Repeated-measures analysis of variances compared preintervention and postintervention accuracy.

Results

The primary survey was completed by 347 individuals. Most participants classified themselves as former athletes or fans (62%). Areas of misconceptions were identified pertaining to risk factors for injury (58.8% answered incorrectly) and postoperative outcomes (64.8% answered incorrectly). Only 41% of respondents, including 34% of coaches, correctly identified pitch counts as an appropriate means of reducing UCL injury risk. Baseline knowledge was relatively high (>90%) for basic anatomy and function. Respondents’ accuracy increased significantly (P < .05) from 75.3% to 85.6% following the educational intervention. No statistical differences were found between demographic subgroups.

Conclusion

Misperceptions regarding UCL injury and management are prevalent within the online baseball community. Misperceptions regarding risk factors for injury were especially profound among those who identified as coaches, indicating opportunity for more targeted educational interventions. Further initiatives should be pursued to educate the baseball community regarding UCL injuries and management.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信