Design and optimization of cruciform tension and shear specimen for forming limit acquisition

IF 6.7 2区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL
Zinan Cheng , Cunsheng Zhang , Yingzhi Li , Jian Qin , Fang Su , Zijie Meng , Liang Chen , Guoqun Zhao
{"title":"Design and optimization of cruciform tension and shear specimen for forming limit acquisition","authors":"Zinan Cheng ,&nbsp;Cunsheng Zhang ,&nbsp;Yingzhi Li ,&nbsp;Jian Qin ,&nbsp;Fang Su ,&nbsp;Zijie Meng ,&nbsp;Liang Chen ,&nbsp;Guoqun Zhao","doi":"10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2025.118864","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The forming limit diagram (FLD) has been widely employed for the formability estimation and prediction of sheet metal. Recently, the cruciform tension test has emerged as a promising strategy to obtain the forming limit curves (FLCs). Compared to conventional bulging test, cruciform tension can readily achieve various strain paths without changing the specimen shape, and effectively avoid the influence caused by the friction and normal stress. However, the design and manufacturing of the cruciform specimen have always hindered the wider application of this technique, since the trade-off dilemma between deformation requirement and machining difficulty is hard to overcome. In this work, based on the comprehensive investigation on existed cruciform specimens, the advantages/disadvantages of different specimens and effect of various specimen features are clarified. Then, combining different specimen features, a series of experiments and finite element (FE) simulations are conducted to obtain the optimum tension and shear specimen suitable for FLC acquisition. Based on the optimum specimens, the FLC covers a large range of strain path can be obtained, improving the applicability of FLC. Moreover, the fracture behavior and morphology are also analyzed for further unveiling of different loading ratios. Finally, the optimum specimens are successfully applied in AA5052-H14 and Q235A steel sheet to obtain their FLCs, indicating a great applicability of the specimen. Therefore, this work conducts a complete and scientific procedure for the cruciform specimen design and experiment implementation, which could offer a universal solution for cruciform design and manufacturing.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":367,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Materials Processing Technology","volume":"340 ","pages":"Article 118864"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Materials Processing Technology","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0924013625001542","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The forming limit diagram (FLD) has been widely employed for the formability estimation and prediction of sheet metal. Recently, the cruciform tension test has emerged as a promising strategy to obtain the forming limit curves (FLCs). Compared to conventional bulging test, cruciform tension can readily achieve various strain paths without changing the specimen shape, and effectively avoid the influence caused by the friction and normal stress. However, the design and manufacturing of the cruciform specimen have always hindered the wider application of this technique, since the trade-off dilemma between deformation requirement and machining difficulty is hard to overcome. In this work, based on the comprehensive investigation on existed cruciform specimens, the advantages/disadvantages of different specimens and effect of various specimen features are clarified. Then, combining different specimen features, a series of experiments and finite element (FE) simulations are conducted to obtain the optimum tension and shear specimen suitable for FLC acquisition. Based on the optimum specimens, the FLC covers a large range of strain path can be obtained, improving the applicability of FLC. Moreover, the fracture behavior and morphology are also analyzed for further unveiling of different loading ratios. Finally, the optimum specimens are successfully applied in AA5052-H14 and Q235A steel sheet to obtain their FLCs, indicating a great applicability of the specimen. Therefore, this work conducts a complete and scientific procedure for the cruciform specimen design and experiment implementation, which could offer a universal solution for cruciform design and manufacturing.
成形极限采集十字形拉伸剪切试样的设计与优化
成形极限图(FLD)已被广泛应用于板材的成形性估计和预测。近年来,十字形拉伸试验已成为获得成形极限曲线的一种很有前途的方法。与常规胀形试验相比,十字形拉伸可以在不改变试样形状的情况下实现多种应变路径,有效避免摩擦和法向应力的影响。然而,由于难以克服变形要求和加工难度之间的权衡,十字形试样的设计和制造一直阻碍着该技术的广泛应用。本文在对现有十字形标本进行综合调查的基础上,阐明了不同标本的优缺点以及各种标本特征的作用。然后,结合不同的试件特征,进行了一系列的试验和有限元模拟,以获得适合FLC采集的最佳拉伸和剪切试件。基于最优试样,可获得大范围应变路径的FLC,提高了FLC的适用性。此外,还分析了不同加载比下的断裂行为和形貌,以进一步揭示不同加载比下的断裂行为。最后,将优化后的试样成功应用于AA5052-H14和Q235A钢板上,得到了两种钢板的flc值,表明该试样具有较强的适用性。因此,本工作为十字形试件的设计和实验实施提供了一个完整、科学的流程,为十字形设计和制造提供了一个通用的解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Materials Processing Technology
Journal of Materials Processing Technology 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
12.60
自引率
4.80%
发文量
403
审稿时长
29 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Materials Processing Technology covers the processing techniques used in manufacturing components from metals and other materials. The journal aims to publish full research papers of original, significant and rigorous work and so to contribute to increased production efficiency and improved component performance. Areas of interest to the journal include: • Casting, forming and machining • Additive processing and joining technologies • The evolution of material properties under the specific conditions met in manufacturing processes • Surface engineering when it relates specifically to a manufacturing process • Design and behavior of equipment and tools.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信