{"title":"Development and application of a neutronics/thermal-hydraulics coupling code based on system code and Anderson acceleration","authors":"Bowen Yang, Jianqiang Shan, Li Ge","doi":"10.1016/j.anucene.2025.111490","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In a main steam line break (MSLB) accident, the degree of mixing of coolant with different temperatures in the lower plenum can significantly affect the power distribution of core, which in turn impacts core safety. The point kinetics model used in traditional system codes is unable to simulate spatial variations in power. To investigate this phenomenon in greater detail, it is essential to couple the system code with a 3D neutron dynamics code. In the development of neutronics/thermal-hydraulics coupling codes based on system codes, operator splitting (OS) method and Picard iteration are often used to advance the time-stepping. The operator splitting method has lower accuracy, while the Picard iteration is an implicit coupling method to improve the computational accuracy of neutronic and thermal–hydraulic coupled codes. However, the convergence of Picard iteration is usually poor, the use of relaxation factors is required to ensure numerical stability. The selection of relaxation factors is typically a manual process, and the optimal range varies under different operating conditions. To enhance the convergence and efficiency of alternate calculations between the neutronic field and thermal–hydraulic field, Anderson acceleration was introduced into the coupled transient simulation of the system code NUSOL-SYS. The developed code with Anderson acceleration was used in transient numerical simulations, and the results demonstrated a significant reduction in the number of coupling iterations. For time steps involving rapid transient changes, the iteration count was reduced to approximately 76.5% of the original Picard iteration, while also eliminating the need for manual selection of relaxation factors. Further validation was performed using the NEACRP 3-D LWR core transient benchmark, where the computed results were in close agreement with reference solutions. Subsequently, the coupled code was applied to simulate the MSLB accident in a pressurized water reactor (PWR). The impact of coolant mixing in the lower plenum on transient parameters was investigated. The results revealed that increased coolant mixing led to lower return to power and reduced local power peaks.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8006,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Nuclear Energy","volume":"219 ","pages":"Article 111490"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Nuclear Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030645492500307X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In a main steam line break (MSLB) accident, the degree of mixing of coolant with different temperatures in the lower plenum can significantly affect the power distribution of core, which in turn impacts core safety. The point kinetics model used in traditional system codes is unable to simulate spatial variations in power. To investigate this phenomenon in greater detail, it is essential to couple the system code with a 3D neutron dynamics code. In the development of neutronics/thermal-hydraulics coupling codes based on system codes, operator splitting (OS) method and Picard iteration are often used to advance the time-stepping. The operator splitting method has lower accuracy, while the Picard iteration is an implicit coupling method to improve the computational accuracy of neutronic and thermal–hydraulic coupled codes. However, the convergence of Picard iteration is usually poor, the use of relaxation factors is required to ensure numerical stability. The selection of relaxation factors is typically a manual process, and the optimal range varies under different operating conditions. To enhance the convergence and efficiency of alternate calculations between the neutronic field and thermal–hydraulic field, Anderson acceleration was introduced into the coupled transient simulation of the system code NUSOL-SYS. The developed code with Anderson acceleration was used in transient numerical simulations, and the results demonstrated a significant reduction in the number of coupling iterations. For time steps involving rapid transient changes, the iteration count was reduced to approximately 76.5% of the original Picard iteration, while also eliminating the need for manual selection of relaxation factors. Further validation was performed using the NEACRP 3-D LWR core transient benchmark, where the computed results were in close agreement with reference solutions. Subsequently, the coupled code was applied to simulate the MSLB accident in a pressurized water reactor (PWR). The impact of coolant mixing in the lower plenum on transient parameters was investigated. The results revealed that increased coolant mixing led to lower return to power and reduced local power peaks.
期刊介绍:
Annals of Nuclear Energy provides an international medium for the communication of original research, ideas and developments in all areas of the field of nuclear energy science and technology. Its scope embraces nuclear fuel reserves, fuel cycles and cost, materials, processing, system and component technology (fission only), design and optimization, direct conversion of nuclear energy sources, environmental control, reactor physics, heat transfer and fluid dynamics, structural analysis, fuel management, future developments, nuclear fuel and safety, nuclear aerosol, neutron physics, computer technology (both software and hardware), risk assessment, radioactive waste disposal and reactor thermal hydraulics. Papers submitted to Annals need to demonstrate a clear link to nuclear power generation/nuclear engineering. Papers which deal with pure nuclear physics, pure health physics, imaging, or attenuation and shielding properties of concretes and various geological materials are not within the scope of the journal. Also, papers that deal with policy or economics are not within the scope of the journal.