Schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSD): an internet-based vignette study of real-world diagnostic accuracy and reliability among psychiatrists and clinical psychologists

Bar Urkin , Josef Parnas , Andrea Raballo , Danny Koren
{"title":"Schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSD): an internet-based vignette study of real-world diagnostic accuracy and reliability among psychiatrists and clinical psychologists","authors":"Bar Urkin ,&nbsp;Josef Parnas ,&nbsp;Andrea Raballo ,&nbsp;Danny Koren","doi":"10.1016/j.psycom.2025.100211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and hypothesis</h3><div>Diagnosing psychiatric conditions in real-life scenarios is challenging, as patients' presentations often differ from the simplified descriptors in mainstream taxonomies. This study aimed to assess the accuracy and reliability of ordinary psychiatrists and clinical psychologists in diagnosing schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSD) through vignettes extrapolated from real-world clinical presentations.</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>We assessed the diagnostic performance of 70 international clinicians (psychiatrists and clinical psychologists) using an online survey. Besides the socio-demographic and professional backgrounds of the participants, the study presented two concise clinical vignettes, that portray different manifestations of typical SSD cases. Participants were asked to evaluate these vignettes, with the primary focus on identifying the most plausible diagnostic hypothesis.</div></div><div><h3>Study results</h3><div>In the first vignette, 71.4 % (50/70) identified an SSD as the main diagnosis, whereas about 23.2 % (14/60) made the same choice for the second vignette. Eleven clinicians (18.3 %) correctly identified both vignettes as SSD cases. The inter-rater diagnostic agreement was fair and significant (Fleiss’ Kappa = .29, p &lt; .00).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The findings indicate poor diagnostic accuracy and reliability for SSD among ordinary psychiatrists and clinical psychologists. When compared to leading international psychiatrists (LIPs) the results suggest a concerning gap in diagnostic proficiency, particularly in real-world clinical scenarios. The low rates of correct diagnosis and fair inter-rater agreement raise concerns about the gradual erosion of in-depth psychopathological understanding in clinical practice. Improving diagnostic accuracy through better training could have profound implications for patient care and treatment outcomes in mental health settings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74595,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatry research communications","volume":"5 2","pages":"Article 100211"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatry research communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772598725000108","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and hypothesis

Diagnosing psychiatric conditions in real-life scenarios is challenging, as patients' presentations often differ from the simplified descriptors in mainstream taxonomies. This study aimed to assess the accuracy and reliability of ordinary psychiatrists and clinical psychologists in diagnosing schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSD) through vignettes extrapolated from real-world clinical presentations.

Study design

We assessed the diagnostic performance of 70 international clinicians (psychiatrists and clinical psychologists) using an online survey. Besides the socio-demographic and professional backgrounds of the participants, the study presented two concise clinical vignettes, that portray different manifestations of typical SSD cases. Participants were asked to evaluate these vignettes, with the primary focus on identifying the most plausible diagnostic hypothesis.

Study results

In the first vignette, 71.4 % (50/70) identified an SSD as the main diagnosis, whereas about 23.2 % (14/60) made the same choice for the second vignette. Eleven clinicians (18.3 %) correctly identified both vignettes as SSD cases. The inter-rater diagnostic agreement was fair and significant (Fleiss’ Kappa = .29, p < .00).

Conclusions

The findings indicate poor diagnostic accuracy and reliability for SSD among ordinary psychiatrists and clinical psychologists. When compared to leading international psychiatrists (LIPs) the results suggest a concerning gap in diagnostic proficiency, particularly in real-world clinical scenarios. The low rates of correct diagnosis and fair inter-rater agreement raise concerns about the gradual erosion of in-depth psychopathological understanding in clinical practice. Improving diagnostic accuracy through better training could have profound implications for patient care and treatment outcomes in mental health settings.
精神分裂症谱系障碍 (SSD):基于互联网的小故事研究:精神科医生和临床心理学家的实际诊断准确性和可靠性
背景与假设在现实生活中诊断精神疾病具有挑战性,因为患者的表现往往不同于主流分类标准中的简化描述。本研究旨在通过从真实世界的临床表现中推断出的小故事,评估普通精神科医生和临床心理学家诊断精神分裂症谱系障碍(SSD)的准确性和可靠性。研究设计我们通过在线调查评估了 70 名国际临床医生(精神科医生和临床心理学家)的诊断表现。除了参与者的社会人口学和专业背景外,研究还提供了两个简明的临床小故事,描绘了典型 SSD 病例的不同表现形式。研究结果在第一个小故事中,71.4%(50/70)的人将 SSD 确定为主要诊断,而在第二个小故事中,约 23.2%(14/60)的人做出了同样的选择。有 11 名临床医生(18.3%)正确地将两个小故事都确定为 SSD 病例。研究结果表明,普通精神科医生和临床心理学家对 SSD 的诊断准确性和可靠性较差。与国际领先的精神病学家(LIPs)相比,结果表明在诊断能力方面存在令人担忧的差距,尤其是在现实世界的临床场景中。诊断正确率低、评分者之间的一致性一般,这让人担心临床实践中对精神病理学的深入理解会逐渐减弱。通过更好的培训来提高诊断的准确性,会对心理健康领域的病人护理和治疗效果产生深远的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychiatry research communications
Psychiatry research communications Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
77 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信