Roots and routes: navigating family identities and relationships in non-kinship care

IF 2.4 2区 社会学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES
Lara Wulleman , Hans Grietens , Ilse Noens , Nicole Vliegen
{"title":"Roots and routes: navigating family identities and relationships in non-kinship care","authors":"Lara Wulleman ,&nbsp;Hans Grietens ,&nbsp;Ilse Noens ,&nbsp;Nicole Vliegen","doi":"10.1016/j.childyouth.2025.108290","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The placement of a child into a foster family alters and redefines existing family structures, having profound implications on the sense of family belonging of various stakeholders. However, studies on family perspectives in foster care often focus on only one or two specific groups, frequently overlooking the insights of children of foster parents and parents. Addressing this gap, our study takes a holistic approach by exploring how (former) foster children (<em>n</em> = 5); parents (<em>n</em> = 4); foster parents (<em>n</em> = 10); children of (former) foster parents (<em>n</em> = 4) and foster care workers (<em>n</em> = 4) in Flanders (Belgium) understand family and how they articulate family relationships and the tensions and complexities that may arise in navigating these relationships in non-kinship care. All were involved in a placement for at least two years. Focus groups and semi-structured interviews were conducted and analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis and relational dialectics theory. Five dialectics were identified in the narratives of participants: family members and non-family members; family belonging and family ambiguity; equal treatment and differential parenting; in the best interest of the child and in the best interest of all children; and imposing and nurturing bonds. The study concludes with a discussion of the implications of these findings for research and practice, highlighting in particular the urgent need for a more inclusive and equitable foster care system that pays attention to the often marginalized voices of parents and children of foster parents.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48428,"journal":{"name":"Children and Youth Services Review","volume":"172 ","pages":"Article 108290"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Children and Youth Services Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740925001732","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The placement of a child into a foster family alters and redefines existing family structures, having profound implications on the sense of family belonging of various stakeholders. However, studies on family perspectives in foster care often focus on only one or two specific groups, frequently overlooking the insights of children of foster parents and parents. Addressing this gap, our study takes a holistic approach by exploring how (former) foster children (n = 5); parents (n = 4); foster parents (n = 10); children of (former) foster parents (n = 4) and foster care workers (n = 4) in Flanders (Belgium) understand family and how they articulate family relationships and the tensions and complexities that may arise in navigating these relationships in non-kinship care. All were involved in a placement for at least two years. Focus groups and semi-structured interviews were conducted and analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis and relational dialectics theory. Five dialectics were identified in the narratives of participants: family members and non-family members; family belonging and family ambiguity; equal treatment and differential parenting; in the best interest of the child and in the best interest of all children; and imposing and nurturing bonds. The study concludes with a discussion of the implications of these findings for research and practice, highlighting in particular the urgent need for a more inclusive and equitable foster care system that pays attention to the often marginalized voices of parents and children of foster parents.
根与路:在非亲缘照顾中探索家庭身份和关系
将儿童安置到寄养家庭改变和重新定义现有的家庭结构,对各种利益相关者的家庭归属感产生深远的影响。然而,关于寄养家庭视角的研究往往只关注一两个特定群体,往往忽略了养父母和父母的孩子的见解。为了解决这一差距,我们的研究采用了一种整体方法,探讨(前)寄养儿童(n = 5);父母(n = 4);养父母(n = 10);佛兰德斯(比利时)(前)寄养父母(n = 4)和寄养工作者(n = 4)的孩子了解家庭,以及他们如何表达家庭关系,以及在非亲属关系中处理这些关系时可能出现的紧张和复杂性。所有人都参加了至少两年的实习。使用反身性主题分析和关系辩证法理论对焦点小组和半结构化访谈进行了分析。在参与者的叙述中发现了五种辩证法:家庭成员和非家庭成员;家庭归属与家庭歧义;平等待遇和差别养育;为了儿童的最大利益和所有儿童的最大利益;加强和培养纽带。该研究最后讨论了这些发现对研究和实践的影响,特别强调了迫切需要建立一个更具包容性和公平的寄养系统,关注父母和寄养父母的孩子经常被边缘化的声音。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
6.10%
发文量
303
期刊介绍: Children and Youth Services Review is an interdisciplinary forum for critical scholarship regarding service programs for children and youth. The journal will publish full-length articles, current research and policy notes, and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信