The moderation of genetic risk for ten major psychiatric and substance use disorders by the genetic aptitude for educational attainment

IF 9.6 1区 医学 Q1 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Kenneth S. Kendler, Henrik Ohlsson, Jan Sundquist, Kristina Sundquist
{"title":"The moderation of genetic risk for ten major psychiatric and substance use disorders by the genetic aptitude for educational attainment","authors":"Kenneth S. Kendler, Henrik Ohlsson, Jan Sundquist, Kristina Sundquist","doi":"10.1038/s41380-025-03022-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We seek to clarify the impact of the Genetic Aptitude for Educational Attainment (GAEA) on risk for 10 psychiatric disorders divided into 4 groups: Internalizing, Externalizing, Eating/Compulsive and Psychotic. Educational attainment and psychiatric and substance use disorder information were obtained from national Swedish registries. GAEA and disorder-specific family genetic risk score (FGRS) were calculated from extended pedigrees. In males, information on IQ and resilience was obtained from the Swedish conscript registry. Affected individuals were born in Sweden from 1973–1995 to Swedish born parents. Controlling for disorder specific FGRS, GAEA were negatively and substantially associated with risk for externalizing and internalizing disorders, minimally associated with psychotic disorder risk and positively and modestly associated with risk for eating/compulsive disorders. While the majority of GAEA effect on risk for externalizing disorders was mediated through impact on IQ, for internalizing disorders, mediation was largely through resilience. For externalizing and internalizing disorders, interactions between GAEA and disorder specific FGRS were robust and negative – the slope of disorder risk with increasing genetic liability was steepest in those with low GAEA. For eating disorders, interactions were modest and positive –the slope of risk with increasing genetic liability being steepest in individuals with high GAEA. We found that the impact of GAEA on risk for psychiatric and substance can be substantial and varies widely across disorders in magnitude, direction, and mediation. GAEA also often interacts, sometimes robustly, with disorder specific genetic risk factors. Comprehensive risk models for psychiatric disorders should consider the inclusion of GAEA.</p>","PeriodicalId":19008,"journal":{"name":"Molecular Psychiatry","volume":"64 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-025-03022-z","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We seek to clarify the impact of the Genetic Aptitude for Educational Attainment (GAEA) on risk for 10 psychiatric disorders divided into 4 groups: Internalizing, Externalizing, Eating/Compulsive and Psychotic. Educational attainment and psychiatric and substance use disorder information were obtained from national Swedish registries. GAEA and disorder-specific family genetic risk score (FGRS) were calculated from extended pedigrees. In males, information on IQ and resilience was obtained from the Swedish conscript registry. Affected individuals were born in Sweden from 1973–1995 to Swedish born parents. Controlling for disorder specific FGRS, GAEA were negatively and substantially associated with risk for externalizing and internalizing disorders, minimally associated with psychotic disorder risk and positively and modestly associated with risk for eating/compulsive disorders. While the majority of GAEA effect on risk for externalizing disorders was mediated through impact on IQ, for internalizing disorders, mediation was largely through resilience. For externalizing and internalizing disorders, interactions between GAEA and disorder specific FGRS were robust and negative – the slope of disorder risk with increasing genetic liability was steepest in those with low GAEA. For eating disorders, interactions were modest and positive –the slope of risk with increasing genetic liability being steepest in individuals with high GAEA. We found that the impact of GAEA on risk for psychiatric and substance can be substantial and varies widely across disorders in magnitude, direction, and mediation. GAEA also often interacts, sometimes robustly, with disorder specific genetic risk factors. Comprehensive risk models for psychiatric disorders should consider the inclusion of GAEA.

Abstract Image

受教育程度的遗传倾向对十种主要精神和物质使用障碍遗传风险的调节作用
我们试图阐明受教育程度遗传倾向(GAEA)对10种精神疾病风险的影响,这些精神疾病分为4组:内化、外化、进食/强迫性和精神病性。教育程度、精神和物质使用障碍的信息从瑞典国家登记处获得。从扩展家系计算GAEA和疾病特异性家族遗传风险评分(FGRS)。在男性中,智商和适应能力的信息来自瑞典应征入伍者登记处。受影响的人是1973年至1995年在瑞典出生的,父母在瑞典出生。在控制障碍特异性FGRS后,GAEA与外化和内化障碍风险呈负相关,与精神障碍风险呈最低程度相关,与进食/强迫障碍风险呈正相关。虽然GAEA对外化障碍风险的影响主要是通过对智商的影响来中介的,但对内化障碍的影响主要是通过心理弹性来中介的。对于外化和内化障碍,GAEA与疾病特异性FGRS之间的相互作用是强而负的——在GAEA低的人群中,疾病风险随遗传倾向性增加的斜率最大。对于饮食失调,相互作用是适度和积极的——在GAEA高的个体中,随着遗传倾向性的增加,风险的斜率最大。我们发现GAEA对精神和物质风险的影响可能是巨大的,并且在程度、方向和调解方面因疾病而有很大差异。GAEA也经常与疾病特定的遗传风险因素相互作用,有时是强烈的相互作用。精神疾病的综合风险模型应考虑纳入GAEA。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Molecular Psychiatry
Molecular Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
20.50
自引率
4.50%
发文量
459
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Molecular Psychiatry focuses on publishing research that aims to uncover the biological mechanisms behind psychiatric disorders and their treatment. The journal emphasizes studies that bridge pre-clinical and clinical research, covering cellular, molecular, integrative, clinical, imaging, and psychopharmacology levels.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信