GVHD prophylaxis in matched related stem cell transplantation: Why post-transplant cyclophosphamide can be recommended a study by the EBMT transplant complications working party

IF 12.8 1区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY
Olaf Penack, Mouad Abouqateb, Christophe Peczynski, William Boreland, Malek Benakli, Nicolaus Kröger, Igor Wolfgang Blau, Didier Blaise, Jaime Sanz, Matthias Eder, Hakan Ozdogu, Dominik Schneidawind, Annoek E. C. Broers, Gerald. G. Wulf, Alberto Mussetti, Ivan Moiseev, Charlotte Graham, Hélène Schoemans, Zinaida Peric
{"title":"GVHD prophylaxis in matched related stem cell transplantation: Why post-transplant cyclophosphamide can be recommended a study by the EBMT transplant complications working party","authors":"Olaf Penack, Mouad Abouqateb, Christophe Peczynski, William Boreland, Malek Benakli, Nicolaus Kröger, Igor Wolfgang Blau, Didier Blaise, Jaime Sanz, Matthias Eder, Hakan Ozdogu, Dominik Schneidawind, Annoek E. C. Broers, Gerald. G. Wulf, Alberto Mussetti, Ivan Moiseev, Charlotte Graham, Hélène Schoemans, Zinaida Peric","doi":"10.1038/s41375-025-02619-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (rATG) reduced chronic GVHD after matched related donor (MRD) allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) from 69% to 32% in a randomized trial and is the recommended standard in Europe. Post-transplantation Cyclophosphamide (PTCy) is an emerging alternative but lacks such solid data in MRD alloSCT. We therefore analyzed outcomes of rATG (<i>n</i> = 4140) vs. PTCy (<i>n</i> = 1069) in adult patients with hematologic malignancies undergoing MRD alloSCT between 2017 and 2021 in the EBMT database. The provided hazard ratios (HR) and P-values are adjusted for potential risk factors using multivariate analysis. Results are given at 2 years after alloSCT for all endpoints except for acute GVHD (100 days). The main difference was a lower relapse incidence after PTCy vs. rATG (26.2% vs. 32.8%; HR 0.78 [CI 95%: 0.66–0.92], <i>p</i> = 0.003). Interaction analyses confirmed the consistency of this result across different disease risk index and conditioning intensity subgroups. Other major transplant outcomes showed no significant differences: non-relapse mortality, overall survival, progression-free survival, GVHD-free relapse-free survival, incidence and severity of acute GVHD as well as chronic GVHD. In summary, PTCy results in comparable GVHD and survival outcomes but lower relapse rates compared to rATG. We conclude that PTCy can be recommended in MRD alloSCT.</p>","PeriodicalId":18109,"journal":{"name":"Leukemia","volume":"266 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Leukemia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41375-025-02619-1","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (rATG) reduced chronic GVHD after matched related donor (MRD) allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) from 69% to 32% in a randomized trial and is the recommended standard in Europe. Post-transplantation Cyclophosphamide (PTCy) is an emerging alternative but lacks such solid data in MRD alloSCT. We therefore analyzed outcomes of rATG (n = 4140) vs. PTCy (n = 1069) in adult patients with hematologic malignancies undergoing MRD alloSCT between 2017 and 2021 in the EBMT database. The provided hazard ratios (HR) and P-values are adjusted for potential risk factors using multivariate analysis. Results are given at 2 years after alloSCT for all endpoints except for acute GVHD (100 days). The main difference was a lower relapse incidence after PTCy vs. rATG (26.2% vs. 32.8%; HR 0.78 [CI 95%: 0.66–0.92], p = 0.003). Interaction analyses confirmed the consistency of this result across different disease risk index and conditioning intensity subgroups. Other major transplant outcomes showed no significant differences: non-relapse mortality, overall survival, progression-free survival, GVHD-free relapse-free survival, incidence and severity of acute GVHD as well as chronic GVHD. In summary, PTCy results in comparable GVHD and survival outcomes but lower relapse rates compared to rATG. We conclude that PTCy can be recommended in MRD alloSCT.

Abstract Image

匹配相关干细胞移植的GVHD预防:为什么移植后环磷酰胺可以推荐EBMT移植并发症工作组的一项研究
在一项随机试验中,兔抗胸腺细胞球蛋白(rATG)将匹配相关供体(MRD)同种异体干细胞移植(alloSCT)后的慢性GVHD从69%降低到32%,是欧洲推荐的标准。移植后环磷酰胺(PTCy)是一种新兴的替代方案,但在MRD同种异体移植中缺乏这样的可靠数据。因此,我们在EBMT数据库中分析了2017年至2021年间接受MRD同种异体移植的成年血液恶性肿瘤患者的rATG (n = 4140)和PTCy (n = 1069)的结果。提供的危险比(HR)和p值使用多变量分析调整潜在危险因素。除急性GVHD(100天)外,所有终点均在同种异体移植后2年给出结果。两组的主要差异是PTCy术后复发率较rATG低(26.2% vs 32.8%;HR 0.78 [CI 95%: 0.66-0.92], p = 0.003)。相互作用分析证实了这一结果在不同疾病风险指数和调节强度亚组之间的一致性。其他主要移植结果无显著差异:非复发死亡率、总生存期、无进展生存期、无复发生存期、急性和慢性GVHD的发病率和严重程度。总之,PTCy的GVHD和生存结果相当,但与rATG相比复发率较低。我们的结论是,PTCy可以推荐用于MRD同种异体移植。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Leukemia
Leukemia 医学-血液学
CiteScore
18.10
自引率
3.50%
发文量
270
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Title: Leukemia Journal Overview: Publishes high-quality, peer-reviewed research Covers all aspects of research and treatment of leukemia and allied diseases Includes studies of normal hemopoiesis due to comparative relevance Topics of Interest: Oncogenes Growth factors Stem cells Leukemia genomics Cell cycle Signal transduction Molecular targets for therapy And more Content Types: Original research articles Reviews Letters Correspondence Comments elaborating on significant advances and covering topical issues
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信