Isokinetic Testing After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury Showed a Greater Hamstrings/Quadriceps Ratio at 240°/S Over 6 Months From Injury but No Difference of Limb Symmetry Index

Q3 Medicine
Guillaume Mesnard M.D. , Gaspard Fournier M.D. , Nicolas Cance , Robert A. Magnussen M.D., M.P.H. , Sébastien Lustig M.D., Ph.D. , Elvire Servien M.D., Ph.D.
{"title":"Isokinetic Testing After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury Showed a Greater Hamstrings/Quadriceps Ratio at 240°/S Over 6 Months From Injury but No Difference of Limb Symmetry Index","authors":"Guillaume Mesnard M.D. ,&nbsp;Gaspard Fournier M.D. ,&nbsp;Nicolas Cance ,&nbsp;Robert A. Magnussen M.D., M.P.H. ,&nbsp;Sébastien Lustig M.D., Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Elvire Servien M.D., Ph.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.asmr.2024.101063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To assess preoperative quadriceps and hamstring strength at various time points after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury but before ACL reconstruction.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients who underwent isokinetic muscle strength testing before planned ACL reconstruction were included. Patients were placed in 1 of the following 3 groups on the basis of time from injury to testing: &lt;3 months, 3 to 6 months, and 6 to 12 months. Among these 3 groups, hamstring and quadriceps limb symmetry index (LSI) and hamstring/quadriceps (H/Q) ratios were compared. A total of 100 patients were included (&lt;3 months [n = 55]; 3-6 months [n = 31]; and 6-12 months [n = 14]).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There were no significant differences between patients in the 3 groups in regards to age, body mass index, or flexion range of motion, but there was a greater proportion of female patients in the 6 to 12 month group than the other groups. No significant differences in quadriceps or hamstring strength were noted among the 3 groups. H/Q ratio was significantly greater in the 6 to 12 month group than the less than 3 months and 3 to 6 months groups, with concentric testing at 240°/s. No correlation was found between patient sex and LSI or H/Q ratios.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Patients who underwent isokinetic muscle strength testing 6 to 12 months after ACL injury had a greater H/Q ratio at 240°/s than those who were testing within 6 months of injury. No differences in hamstring or quadriceps LSI were noted on the basis of time.</div></div><div><h3>Clinical Relevance</h3><div>An understanding of the factors that influence preoperative isokinetic muscle strength testing (including time from injury to surgery) is important, given associations noted between preoperative strength and postoperative strength recovery after ACL reconstruction.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34631,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation","volume":"7 2","pages":"Article 101063"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666061X24002062","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To assess preoperative quadriceps and hamstring strength at various time points after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury but before ACL reconstruction.

Methods

Patients who underwent isokinetic muscle strength testing before planned ACL reconstruction were included. Patients were placed in 1 of the following 3 groups on the basis of time from injury to testing: <3 months, 3 to 6 months, and 6 to 12 months. Among these 3 groups, hamstring and quadriceps limb symmetry index (LSI) and hamstring/quadriceps (H/Q) ratios were compared. A total of 100 patients were included (<3 months [n = 55]; 3-6 months [n = 31]; and 6-12 months [n = 14]).

Results

There were no significant differences between patients in the 3 groups in regards to age, body mass index, or flexion range of motion, but there was a greater proportion of female patients in the 6 to 12 month group than the other groups. No significant differences in quadriceps or hamstring strength were noted among the 3 groups. H/Q ratio was significantly greater in the 6 to 12 month group than the less than 3 months and 3 to 6 months groups, with concentric testing at 240°/s. No correlation was found between patient sex and LSI or H/Q ratios.

Conclusions

Patients who underwent isokinetic muscle strength testing 6 to 12 months after ACL injury had a greater H/Q ratio at 240°/s than those who were testing within 6 months of injury. No differences in hamstring or quadriceps LSI were noted on the basis of time.

Clinical Relevance

An understanding of the factors that influence preoperative isokinetic muscle strength testing (including time from injury to surgery) is important, given associations noted between preoperative strength and postoperative strength recovery after ACL reconstruction.
前交叉韧带损伤后的等速运动测试显示,损伤后6个月大腘绳肌/股四头肌比值为240°/S,但肢体对称指数无差异
目的评估前交叉韧带(ACL)损伤后和重建前不同时间点的股四头肌和腘绳肌力量。方法纳入计划ACL重建前进行等速肌力测试的患者。根据从损伤到检测的时间将患者分为以下3组:3个月、3 ~ 6个月和6 ~ 12个月。比较3组患者腘绳肌和股四头肌肢体对称指数(LSI)和腘绳肌/股四头肌(H/Q)比值。共纳入100例患者(<;3个月[n = 55];3 ~ 6个月[n = 31];6-12个月[n = 14])。结果3组患者在年龄、体质指数、屈曲活动度等方面均无显著差异,但6 ~ 12个月组女性患者比例高于其他组。在股四头肌或腘绳肌力量方面,3组之间没有明显差异。6 ~ 12个月组的H/Q比明显大于小于3个月组和3 ~ 6个月组,同心测试240°/s。未发现患者性别与LSI或H/Q比值相关。结论前交叉韧带损伤后6 ~ 12个月进行等速肌力测试的患者在240°/s时的H/Q比高于损伤后6个月内进行等速肌力测试的患者。腘绳肌和股四头肌的LSI在时间上没有差异。考虑到术前肌力与ACL重建术后肌力恢复之间的关联,了解影响术前等速肌力测试的因素(包括从受伤到手术的时间)是很重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
218
审稿时长
45 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信