Cross-ecosystem effects of light pollution and invasive signal crayfish on riparian spiders

IF 3.5 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Alessandro Manfrin , Jens Schirmel , Marina Arias , Martin H. Entling , Julian Hoffmann , Maike Huszarik , Sebastian Kolb , Anne Schrimpf , Thomas Schmidt , Mirco Bundschuh , Ralf Schulz
{"title":"Cross-ecosystem effects of light pollution and invasive signal crayfish on riparian spiders","authors":"Alessandro Manfrin ,&nbsp;Jens Schirmel ,&nbsp;Marina Arias ,&nbsp;Martin H. Entling ,&nbsp;Julian Hoffmann ,&nbsp;Maike Huszarik ,&nbsp;Sebastian Kolb ,&nbsp;Anne Schrimpf ,&nbsp;Thomas Schmidt ,&nbsp;Mirco Bundschuh ,&nbsp;Ralf Schulz","doi":"10.1016/j.gecco.2025.e03577","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Ecosystems face multiple abiotic and biotic stressors that interact and extend beyond ecosystem boundaries. Both artificial light at night (ALAN) and invasive species are major threats to freshwater biodiversity in Europe. We used a riparian stream mesocosm facility, with 16 replicated units each containing an artificial flume and adjacent terrestrial habitat, to investigate the effects of ALAN, the invasive signal crayfish <em>Pacifastacus leniusculus</em> and their interaction. We specifically addressed their impact on aquatic insect emergence and the potential bottom-up control of riparian spiders. As expected, crayfish reduced insect emergence by 35 % after one-week, while ALAN had no significant effect. Moreover, spider numbers, particularly of riparian Tetragnathidae <em>Pachygnatha degeeri</em> and <em>Tetragnatha extensa</em>, correlated positively with insect emergence, indicating indirect negative effects of the crayfish. During the first week of our experiment, spider numbers increased by 22 % in pitfall traps exposed to ALAN, but decreased by 25 % in suction samples. This difference is likely driven by differences in species composition between the two sampling methods. All in all, the direction and strength of crayfish and ALAN effects were taxon- and time-dependent. This study provides evidence that the impact of signal crayfish can extend beyond aquatic systems and suggests that the effects of crayfish invasion and ALAN are largely independent.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54264,"journal":{"name":"Global Ecology and Conservation","volume":"60 ","pages":"Article e03577"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Ecology and Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351989425001787","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ecosystems face multiple abiotic and biotic stressors that interact and extend beyond ecosystem boundaries. Both artificial light at night (ALAN) and invasive species are major threats to freshwater biodiversity in Europe. We used a riparian stream mesocosm facility, with 16 replicated units each containing an artificial flume and adjacent terrestrial habitat, to investigate the effects of ALAN, the invasive signal crayfish Pacifastacus leniusculus and their interaction. We specifically addressed their impact on aquatic insect emergence and the potential bottom-up control of riparian spiders. As expected, crayfish reduced insect emergence by 35 % after one-week, while ALAN had no significant effect. Moreover, spider numbers, particularly of riparian Tetragnathidae Pachygnatha degeeri and Tetragnatha extensa, correlated positively with insect emergence, indicating indirect negative effects of the crayfish. During the first week of our experiment, spider numbers increased by 22 % in pitfall traps exposed to ALAN, but decreased by 25 % in suction samples. This difference is likely driven by differences in species composition between the two sampling methods. All in all, the direction and strength of crayfish and ALAN effects were taxon- and time-dependent. This study provides evidence that the impact of signal crayfish can extend beyond aquatic systems and suggests that the effects of crayfish invasion and ALAN are largely independent.
光污染和入侵小龙虾对河岸蜘蛛的跨生态系统影响
生态系统面临多种非生物和生物压力源,这些压力源相互作用并扩展到生态系统边界之外。夜间人造光(ALAN)和入侵物种都是欧洲淡水生物多样性的主要威胁。我们利用一个滨水溪流生态系统设施,在16个复制单元中,每个单元都包含一个人工水槽和邻近的陆地栖息地,研究了入侵信号小龙虾太平洋螯虾(Pacifastacus leniusculus)和ALAN的影响及其相互作用。我们特别讨论了它们对水生昆虫羽化的影响以及潜在的自下而上的河岸蜘蛛控制。正如预期的那样,小龙虾在一周后减少了35% %的昆虫出苗率,而ALAN没有显著的效果。此外,蜘蛛数量与昆虫羽化呈显著正相关,特别是滨水四科、厚蛛科和宽蛛科蜘蛛数量与昆虫羽化呈显著正相关,表明小龙虾对昆虫羽化有间接的负面影响。在我们实验的第一周,暴露于ALAN的陷阱中的蜘蛛数量增加了22% %,但在吸力样品中减少了25% %。这种差异可能是由两种采样方法之间的物种组成差异造成的。总之,小龙虾和ALAN效应的方向和强度是分类单元和时间依赖的。本研究提供的证据表明,信号小龙虾的影响可以扩展到水生系统之外,并表明小龙虾入侵和ALAN的影响在很大程度上是独立的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Ecology and Conservation
Global Ecology and Conservation Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
5.00%
发文量
346
审稿时长
83 days
期刊介绍: Global Ecology and Conservation is a peer-reviewed, open-access journal covering all sub-disciplines of ecological and conservation science: from theory to practice, from molecules to ecosystems, from regional to global. The fields covered include: organismal, population, community, and ecosystem ecology; physiological, evolutionary, and behavioral ecology; and conservation science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信