Lack of accuracy of force platform in predicting falls in older adults

IF 1.2 Q3 REHABILITATION
Juliana Botinhon Orlando , Anna Cláudia Sabino Serra , Marcos Eduardo Scheicher
{"title":"Lack of accuracy of force platform in predicting falls in older adults","authors":"Juliana Botinhon Orlando ,&nbsp;Anna Cláudia Sabino Serra ,&nbsp;Marcos Eduardo Scheicher","doi":"10.1016/j.jbmt.2025.04.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Postural instability is related to falls in older adults. One tool for assessing postural instability is the force platform, but there is little information on its accuracy in discriminating fall risk in older adults.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To determine the accuracy of the force platform in predicting falls and discriminating fallers from non-fallers older adults.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>Was a single-arm cross-sectional study of 96 older adults aged ≥60 years, divided into fallers (single and recurrent) and non-fallers. Center of pressure (COP) sway was evaluated on a force platform under the conditions of eyes open/closed and stable/unstable surface in the variables: anteroposterior(Xavg) and mediolateral (Yavg) COP displacement; total COP displacement (path length); mediolateral(Ysd) and anteroposterior(Xsd) standard deviations of COP; mean COP velocity(Vavg); anteroposterior (Vx) and mediolateral (Vy) COP velocity; 95 % ellipse area. Comparisons between groups were made using one-way ANOVA or the Kuskal-Wallis test and the association between falls and the variables was made using logistic regression. The Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (ROC curve) was used to determine the accuracy of the force platform.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Significant difference was found for path length, Vavg, Vx and Xsd and Vavg, showing that recurrent fallers had greater COP oscillation. There was an association between area, Xsd and Ysd (single fallers) and Xavg (recurrent fallers). The ROC curve showed no accuracy in predicting falls.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The force platform was able to distinguish non-fallers from recurrent fallers in some situations and balance variables. Despite this, the study did not find reasonable accuracy of the instrument in predicting falls.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51431,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES","volume":"43 ","pages":"Pages 16-20"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S136085922500110X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Postural instability is related to falls in older adults. One tool for assessing postural instability is the force platform, but there is little information on its accuracy in discriminating fall risk in older adults.

Objective

To determine the accuracy of the force platform in predicting falls and discriminating fallers from non-fallers older adults.

Method

Was a single-arm cross-sectional study of 96 older adults aged ≥60 years, divided into fallers (single and recurrent) and non-fallers. Center of pressure (COP) sway was evaluated on a force platform under the conditions of eyes open/closed and stable/unstable surface in the variables: anteroposterior(Xavg) and mediolateral (Yavg) COP displacement; total COP displacement (path length); mediolateral(Ysd) and anteroposterior(Xsd) standard deviations of COP; mean COP velocity(Vavg); anteroposterior (Vx) and mediolateral (Vy) COP velocity; 95 % ellipse area. Comparisons between groups were made using one-way ANOVA or the Kuskal-Wallis test and the association between falls and the variables was made using logistic regression. The Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (ROC curve) was used to determine the accuracy of the force platform.

Results

Significant difference was found for path length, Vavg, Vx and Xsd and Vavg, showing that recurrent fallers had greater COP oscillation. There was an association between area, Xsd and Ysd (single fallers) and Xavg (recurrent fallers). The ROC curve showed no accuracy in predicting falls.

Conclusions

The force platform was able to distinguish non-fallers from recurrent fallers in some situations and balance variables. Despite this, the study did not find reasonable accuracy of the instrument in predicting falls.
力平台在预测老年人跌倒方面缺乏准确性
背景:体位不稳定与老年人跌倒有关。评估体位不稳定性的一种工具是力平台,但关于其在区分老年人跌倒风险方面的准确性的信息很少。目的确定力平台在预测跌倒和区分老年人跌倒者和非跌倒者中的准确性。方法对96名年龄≥60岁的老年人进行单臂横断面研究,分为跌倒者(单一和复发)和非跌倒者。在力平台上评估眼开/闭和稳定/不稳定表面条件下的压力中心(COP)摇摆变量:正侧(Xavg)和中外侧(Yavg) COP位移;总COP位移(路径长度);COP的中外侧(Ysd)和正侧(Xsd)标准差;平均COP速度(Vavg);正位(Vx)和中外侧(Vy) COP速度;95%椭圆面积。组间比较采用单因素方差分析或Kuskal-Wallis检验,跌倒与变量之间的关系采用逻辑回归。采用受试者工作特征曲线(ROC曲线)确定受力平台的精度。结果路径长度、Vavg、Vx、Xsd和Vavg均有显著差异,表明反复降雪者有较大的COP振荡。面积、Xsd和Ysd(单次降雪者)和Xavg(复发降雪者)之间存在相关性。ROC曲线在预测跌倒方面没有准确性。结论在某些情况和平衡变量下,力平台能够区分非跌倒者和复发跌倒者。尽管如此,该研究并未发现该仪器在预测跌倒方面的合理准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
133
审稿时长
321 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies brings you the latest therapeutic techniques and current professional debate. Publishing highly illustrated articles on a wide range of subjects this journal is immediately relevant to everyday clinical practice in private, community and primary health care settings. Techiques featured include: • Physical Therapy • Osteopathy • Chiropractic • Massage Therapy • Structural Integration • Feldenkrais • Yoga Therapy • Dance • Physiotherapy • Pilates • Alexander Technique • Shiatsu and Tuina
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信