Validating the recommended cumulative rest allowance equation for use in workload management

IF 2.5 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL
Jared-Isaac Friedel, Justin B. Davidson, Steve L. Fischer
{"title":"Validating the recommended cumulative rest allowance equation for use in workload management","authors":"Jared-Isaac Friedel,&nbsp;Justin B. Davidson,&nbsp;Steve L. Fischer","doi":"10.1016/j.ergon.2025.103746","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Recommended Cumulative Rest Allowance (RCRA) equation estimates rest requirements based on effort intensity and duty cycle and may be important when optimizing daily workload to maintain productivity without undue muscle fatigue development; however, its validity has not been confirmed. Thus, the purpose of this study was to investigate whether muscle fatigue accumulates when rest time is insufficient according to the RCRA equation, and whether no fatigue occurs in protocols deemed to have sufficient or excess rest. Thirty-two participants performed isometric triceps extensions under three protocols: insufficient rest, sufficient rest, and excess rest for the same total work. Muscle fatigue was assessed by comparing maximum voluntary exertions (MVE) before and after each protocol and investigating amplitude and frequency changes in surface electromyography recorded from the triceps. MVE significantly decreased by an average of 2.4 % after all protocols.</div><div>Participants showed significantly higher EMG amplitudes and lower mean power frequencies over time during the insufficient rest protocol, however, no changes were observed in the sufficient and excess rest protocols. This provides evidence supporting that the RCRA may be a useful tool to optimize workloads in the workplace; however, studies using longer exposure times are necessary to confirm its effectiveness.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50317,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics","volume":"107 ","pages":"Article 103746"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169814125000526","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Recommended Cumulative Rest Allowance (RCRA) equation estimates rest requirements based on effort intensity and duty cycle and may be important when optimizing daily workload to maintain productivity without undue muscle fatigue development; however, its validity has not been confirmed. Thus, the purpose of this study was to investigate whether muscle fatigue accumulates when rest time is insufficient according to the RCRA equation, and whether no fatigue occurs in protocols deemed to have sufficient or excess rest. Thirty-two participants performed isometric triceps extensions under three protocols: insufficient rest, sufficient rest, and excess rest for the same total work. Muscle fatigue was assessed by comparing maximum voluntary exertions (MVE) before and after each protocol and investigating amplitude and frequency changes in surface electromyography recorded from the triceps. MVE significantly decreased by an average of 2.4 % after all protocols.
Participants showed significantly higher EMG amplitudes and lower mean power frequencies over time during the insufficient rest protocol, however, no changes were observed in the sufficient and excess rest protocols. This provides evidence supporting that the RCRA may be a useful tool to optimize workloads in the workplace; however, studies using longer exposure times are necessary to confirm its effectiveness.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics
International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 工程技术-工程:工业
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
12.90%
发文量
110
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: The journal publishes original contributions that add to our understanding of the role of humans in today systems and the interactions thereof with various system components. The journal typically covers the following areas: industrial and occupational ergonomics, design of systems, tools and equipment, human performance measurement and modeling, human productivity, humans in technologically complex systems, and safety. The focus of the articles includes basic theoretical advances, applications, case studies, new methodologies and procedures; and empirical studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信