Comprehensive evaluation of ultrasound imaging reliability in assessing axioscapular muscle thickness in individuals with and without neck pain

IF 1.2 Q3 REHABILITATION
Rungratcha Aramsaengthien , Sureeporn Uthaikhup , Sompong Sriburee , Jirachawit Chiraratsakun , Chitawat Ranooros
{"title":"Comprehensive evaluation of ultrasound imaging reliability in assessing axioscapular muscle thickness in individuals with and without neck pain","authors":"Rungratcha Aramsaengthien ,&nbsp;Sureeporn Uthaikhup ,&nbsp;Sompong Sriburee ,&nbsp;Jirachawit Chiraratsakun ,&nbsp;Chitawat Ranooros","doi":"10.1016/j.jbmt.2025.04.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>With a greater impact of altered axioscapular muscles on musculoskeletal disorders, attention is being focused on the use of ultrasound imaging to assess these muscles. However, ultrasound measurements can be influenced by several factors. This study aimed to evaluate inter- and intra-rater reliability of ultrasound imaging for measuring axioscapular muscle thickness in individuals with and without neck pain.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Twenty healthy adults and 20 individuals with non-specific neck pain were recruited into the study. Measurements were taken using ultrasound imaging at rest and during muscle contraction at 120° of shoulder flexion with a 1-kg load for upper trapezius (UT), lower trapezius (LT), serratus anterior (SA) and levator scapulae (LS). Inter- and intra-rater reliability was examined using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), standard errors of measurements (SEMs), minimum detectable change (MDC) and Bland-Altman plots.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Good to excellent inter- and intra-rater reliability was demonstrated at rest and during muscle contraction for all muscles in healthy adults (ICCs = 0.77 to 0.93 and ICCs = 0.78 to 0.96, respectively) and individuals with neck pain (ICCs = 0.79 to 0.95 and ICCs = 0.79 to 0.98, respectively). Overall, the SEMs and MDCs were relatively small. There were good agreements between examiners and between days, with minimal bias.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Ultrasound imaging proves to be a reliable tool for assessing axioscapular muscle thickness (i.e., UT, LT, SA and LS), both at rest and during arm elevation in healthy adults and individuals with neck pain. However, standardized protocols and proper training are essential for ensuring consistent results.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51431,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES","volume":"43 ","pages":"Pages 7-15"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1360859225001135","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

With a greater impact of altered axioscapular muscles on musculoskeletal disorders, attention is being focused on the use of ultrasound imaging to assess these muscles. However, ultrasound measurements can be influenced by several factors. This study aimed to evaluate inter- and intra-rater reliability of ultrasound imaging for measuring axioscapular muscle thickness in individuals with and without neck pain.

Methods

Twenty healthy adults and 20 individuals with non-specific neck pain were recruited into the study. Measurements were taken using ultrasound imaging at rest and during muscle contraction at 120° of shoulder flexion with a 1-kg load for upper trapezius (UT), lower trapezius (LT), serratus anterior (SA) and levator scapulae (LS). Inter- and intra-rater reliability was examined using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), standard errors of measurements (SEMs), minimum detectable change (MDC) and Bland-Altman plots.

Results

Good to excellent inter- and intra-rater reliability was demonstrated at rest and during muscle contraction for all muscles in healthy adults (ICCs = 0.77 to 0.93 and ICCs = 0.78 to 0.96, respectively) and individuals with neck pain (ICCs = 0.79 to 0.95 and ICCs = 0.79 to 0.98, respectively). Overall, the SEMs and MDCs were relatively small. There were good agreements between examiners and between days, with minimal bias.

Conclusions

Ultrasound imaging proves to be a reliable tool for assessing axioscapular muscle thickness (i.e., UT, LT, SA and LS), both at rest and during arm elevation in healthy adults and individuals with neck pain. However, standardized protocols and proper training are essential for ensuring consistent results.
综合评价超声成像在评估有无颈部疼痛患者轴肩肌厚度中的可靠性
随着轴肩肌改变对肌肉骨骼疾病的影响越来越大,人们越来越关注使用超声成像来评估这些肌肉。然而,超声测量可能受到几个因素的影响。本研究旨在评估超声成像在有或无颈部疼痛的个体中测量轴肩肌厚度的内部和内部可靠性。方法选取20名健康成人和20名非特异性颈部疼痛患者。在静息和1 kg负荷下屈肩120°肌肉收缩时,采用超声成像对上斜方肌(UT)、下斜方肌(LT)、前锯肌(SA)和肩胛提肌(LS)进行测量。采用类内相关系数(ICCs)、测量标准误差(SEMs)、最小可检测变化(MDC)和Bland-Altman图检验了组间和组内信度。结果健康成人(ICCs = 0.77 ~ 0.93, ICCs = 0.78 ~ 0.96)和颈部疼痛患者(ICCs = 0.79 ~ 0.95, ICCs = 0.79 ~ 0.98)的所有肌肉在休息和肌肉收缩时均表现出良好至优异的组间和组内可靠性。总体而言,中小企业和发展中国家的规模相对较小。考官之间和考官之间都达成了很好的协议,偏见最小。结论超声成像被证明是评估健康成人和颈部疼痛患者静息和抬臂时轴肩肌厚度(即UT、LT、SA和LS)的可靠工具。然而,标准化的规程和适当的培训对于确保一致的结果至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
133
审稿时长
321 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies brings you the latest therapeutic techniques and current professional debate. Publishing highly illustrated articles on a wide range of subjects this journal is immediately relevant to everyday clinical practice in private, community and primary health care settings. Techiques featured include: • Physical Therapy • Osteopathy • Chiropractic • Massage Therapy • Structural Integration • Feldenkrais • Yoga Therapy • Dance • Physiotherapy • Pilates • Alexander Technique • Shiatsu and Tuina
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信