Gabriella Meier Bürgisser, Pietro Giovanoli, Maurizio Calcagni, Johanna Buschmann
{"title":"Comparison of collagen I and collagen III immunohistochemistry with Herovici staining in various rabbit organs","authors":"Gabriella Meier Bürgisser, Pietro Giovanoli, Maurizio Calcagni, Johanna Buschmann","doi":"10.1016/j.acthis.2025.152256","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Collagen I and III distribution is not only crucial to assess the status of healing wounds, but also to characterise healthy connective tissue and pathological extracellular matrix composition. In this technical note, we have therefore compared the dual-coloured Herovici staining, indicating pink collagen I and blue collagen III in serial sections with immunohistochemistry (IHC) labellings for collagen I and III, respectively. Furthermore, we used, chromogenic DAB for IHC labelling. Seven different organs of a healthy New Zealand white rabbit were collected for this purpose, including kidney, liver, tonsil, tongue, duodenum, heart, and brain, respectively. A dual-coloured staining like Herovici turned out to be as good as two single-colour labellings utilising IHC. In some cases, co-localisation and extent of collagen I and III expression could be qualitatively visualised better using Herovici, with gradients of blue-violet-pink, than by mere comparison of labelling intensities side by side in two different sections, although taken at the same place as serial sections. Nevertheless, a quantitative analysis of the Collagen I-to-III ratio revealed no significant differences between these two approaches to assess the extracellular matrix composition. From these comparisons, we conclude that a Herovici staining is recommended as a valuable alternative staining to collagen I and III IHC; and it may act as a fast and cheap preliminary staining method. These findings encourage researchers focusing on ECM composition of the experimental rabbit tissue to use Herovici staining to determine the ratio of the extracellular collagen I and III expression.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":6961,"journal":{"name":"Acta histochemica","volume":"127 2","pages":"Article 152256"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta histochemica","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0065128125000285","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Collagen I and III distribution is not only crucial to assess the status of healing wounds, but also to characterise healthy connective tissue and pathological extracellular matrix composition. In this technical note, we have therefore compared the dual-coloured Herovici staining, indicating pink collagen I and blue collagen III in serial sections with immunohistochemistry (IHC) labellings for collagen I and III, respectively. Furthermore, we used, chromogenic DAB for IHC labelling. Seven different organs of a healthy New Zealand white rabbit were collected for this purpose, including kidney, liver, tonsil, tongue, duodenum, heart, and brain, respectively. A dual-coloured staining like Herovici turned out to be as good as two single-colour labellings utilising IHC. In some cases, co-localisation and extent of collagen I and III expression could be qualitatively visualised better using Herovici, with gradients of blue-violet-pink, than by mere comparison of labelling intensities side by side in two different sections, although taken at the same place as serial sections. Nevertheless, a quantitative analysis of the Collagen I-to-III ratio revealed no significant differences between these two approaches to assess the extracellular matrix composition. From these comparisons, we conclude that a Herovici staining is recommended as a valuable alternative staining to collagen I and III IHC; and it may act as a fast and cheap preliminary staining method. These findings encourage researchers focusing on ECM composition of the experimental rabbit tissue to use Herovici staining to determine the ratio of the extracellular collagen I and III expression.
期刊介绍:
Acta histochemica, a journal of structural biochemistry of cells and tissues, publishes original research articles, short communications, reviews, letters to the editor, meeting reports and abstracts of meetings. The aim of the journal is to provide a forum for the cytochemical and histochemical research community in the life sciences, including cell biology, biotechnology, neurobiology, immunobiology, pathology, pharmacology, botany, zoology and environmental and toxicological research. The journal focuses on new developments in cytochemistry and histochemistry and their applications. Manuscripts reporting on studies of living cells and tissues are particularly welcome. Understanding the complexity of cells and tissues, i.e. their biocomplexity and biodiversity, is a major goal of the journal and reports on this topic are especially encouraged. Original research articles, short communications and reviews that report on new developments in cytochemistry and histochemistry are welcomed, especially when molecular biology is combined with the use of advanced microscopical techniques including image analysis and cytometry. Letters to the editor should comment or interpret previously published articles in the journal to trigger scientific discussions. Meeting reports are considered to be very important publications in the journal because they are excellent opportunities to present state-of-the-art overviews of fields in research where the developments are fast and hard to follow. Authors of meeting reports should consult the editors before writing a report. The editorial policy of the editors and the editorial board is rapid publication. Once a manuscript is received by one of the editors, an editorial decision about acceptance, revision or rejection will be taken within a month. It is the aim of the publishers to have a manuscript published within three months after the manuscript has been accepted