Consideration of quantity loss in packaging strategies for the fresh agricultural products supply chain

Zhonghua Ma, Rufei Li
{"title":"Consideration of quantity loss in packaging strategies for the fresh agricultural products supply chain","authors":"Zhonghua Ma,&nbsp;Rufei Li","doi":"10.1016/j.susoc.2025.03.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Fresh food waste represents both a market inefficiency and an environmental failure. While packaging can reduce losses or waste of fresh products, it also contributes to carbon emissions. This study constructs a mathematical model that comprehensively considers fresh product loss rates, consumer attitudes, packaging costs, and related investment decisions to explore the impact of different packaging strategies on loss reduction, profit, and sustainability in the fresh agricultural products supply chain. Our research delves into the optimal packaging strategy through comparative analysis, resulting in the following key points: (1) The NP strategy leads to higher loss rates and lower profits. (2) When packaging costs are properly controlled, both the SP and RP strategies can enhance profits while increasing demand and extending supply duration, contributing positively to social sustainability. (3) Regarding environmental sustainability, the NP strategy results in the least carbon emissions when the loss rate is very low, while the SP strategy is suitable for long supply chains and high loss rates, and the RP strategy is appropriate for products with significant demand fluctuations and high value.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101201,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Operations and Computers","volume":"6 ","pages":"Pages 104-115"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Operations and Computers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666412725000054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fresh food waste represents both a market inefficiency and an environmental failure. While packaging can reduce losses or waste of fresh products, it also contributes to carbon emissions. This study constructs a mathematical model that comprehensively considers fresh product loss rates, consumer attitudes, packaging costs, and related investment decisions to explore the impact of different packaging strategies on loss reduction, profit, and sustainability in the fresh agricultural products supply chain. Our research delves into the optimal packaging strategy through comparative analysis, resulting in the following key points: (1) The NP strategy leads to higher loss rates and lower profits. (2) When packaging costs are properly controlled, both the SP and RP strategies can enhance profits while increasing demand and extending supply duration, contributing positively to social sustainability. (3) Regarding environmental sustainability, the NP strategy results in the least carbon emissions when the loss rate is very low, while the SP strategy is suitable for long supply chains and high loss rates, and the RP strategy is appropriate for products with significant demand fluctuations and high value.
生鲜农产品供应链包装策略中数量损失的考虑
新鲜食物浪费既代表市场效率低下,也代表环境失败。虽然包装可以减少新鲜产品的损失或浪费,但它也有助于碳排放。本文构建了一个综合考虑生鲜产品损失率、消费者态度、包装成本和相关投资决策的数学模型,探讨不同包装策略对生鲜农产品供应链中减损、利润和可持续性的影响。我们的研究通过对比分析来探讨最优包装策略,得出以下关键点:(1)NP策略导致更高的损失率和更低的利润。(2)在包装成本控制得当的情况下,SP和RP策略都可以在增加需求和延长供应时间的同时提高利润,对社会可持续性有积极的贡献。(3)在环境可持续性方面,NP策略在损失率很低时碳排放最少,SP策略适用于长供应链和高损失率的情况,RP策略适用于需求波动大、价值高的产品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
18.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信