Human health risk assessment for exposures to 1,3-butadiene in the United States with input from an independent science advisory panel

IF 3 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, LEGAL
C.R. Kirman , G. Boysen , M.J. DiNovi , R. Roy , B.R. Sonawane , S.M. Hays
{"title":"Human health risk assessment for exposures to 1,3-butadiene in the United States with input from an independent science advisory panel","authors":"C.R. Kirman ,&nbsp;G. Boysen ,&nbsp;M.J. DiNovi ,&nbsp;R. Roy ,&nbsp;B.R. Sonawane ,&nbsp;S.M. Hays","doi":"10.1016/j.yrtph.2025.105819","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>A human health risk assessment was conducted for potential cancer and noncancer effects of 1,3-butadiene (BD) using best available science, data, and methodologies. An independent panel of experts was engaged to provide input and guidance on key decisions made in the quantitative assessment. BD biomarker data played an important role in quantifying species differences, human variation, and quantifying smoking exposures. The assessment included consideration of nineteen scenarios for potential worker exposures, each of which include characterization of the impact of respirator use, and seven scenarios for aggregate exposures to BD across pathways. Monte Carlo methods were used to characterize uncertainty and variation risks and hazards from exposures to BD. The results of this assessment support three general conclusions: (1) ambient air is generally not an important source of BD exposure to the U.S. population when compared to other sources; (2) exposures to BD in the US are not expected to pose an unreasonable risk of cancer or noncancer effects; and (3) the existing OSHA PEL of 1 ppm is considered to be protective of the potential cancer risks and noncancer hazards from BD exposures.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20852,"journal":{"name":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","volume":"160 ","pages":"Article 105819"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0273230025000492","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A human health risk assessment was conducted for potential cancer and noncancer effects of 1,3-butadiene (BD) using best available science, data, and methodologies. An independent panel of experts was engaged to provide input and guidance on key decisions made in the quantitative assessment. BD biomarker data played an important role in quantifying species differences, human variation, and quantifying smoking exposures. The assessment included consideration of nineteen scenarios for potential worker exposures, each of which include characterization of the impact of respirator use, and seven scenarios for aggregate exposures to BD across pathways. Monte Carlo methods were used to characterize uncertainty and variation risks and hazards from exposures to BD. The results of this assessment support three general conclusions: (1) ambient air is generally not an important source of BD exposure to the U.S. population when compared to other sources; (2) exposures to BD in the US are not expected to pose an unreasonable risk of cancer or noncancer effects; and (3) the existing OSHA PEL of 1 ppm is considered to be protective of the potential cancer risks and noncancer hazards from BD exposures.
美国1,3-丁二烯暴露的人类健康风险评估,由独立科学咨询小组提供意见
利用现有的最佳科学、数据和方法,对1,3-丁二烯(BD)的潜在癌症和非癌症效应进行了人类健康风险评估。聘请了一个独立的专家小组,就定量评估中作出的关键决定提供投入和指导。BD生物标志物数据在量化物种差异、人类变异和吸烟暴露方面发挥了重要作用。评估包括考虑19种潜在的工人暴露情景,每一种情景都包括使用呼吸器影响的特征,以及7种跨途径暴露于双溴联苯的情景。蒙特卡罗方法用于表征双相障碍暴露的不确定性和变异风险和危害。该评估结果支持三个一般性结论:(1)与其他来源相比,环境空气通常不是美国人群双相障碍暴露的重要来源;(2)在美国,双相障碍暴露预计不会造成不合理的癌症或非癌症影响风险;(3)现有的OSHA PEL值为1ppm被认为可以保护双酚a暴露的潜在癌症风险和非癌症危害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
8.80%
发文量
147
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology publishes peer reviewed articles that involve the generation, evaluation, and interpretation of experimental animal and human data that are of direct importance and relevance for regulatory authorities with respect to toxicological and pharmacological regulations in society. All peer-reviewed articles that are published should be devoted to improve the protection of human health and environment. Reviews and discussions are welcomed that address legal and/or regulatory decisions with respect to risk assessment and management of toxicological and pharmacological compounds on a scientific basis. It addresses an international readership of scientists, risk assessors and managers, and other professionals active in the field of human and environmental health. Types of peer-reviewed articles published: -Original research articles of relevance for regulatory aspects covering aspects including, but not limited to: 1.Factors influencing human sensitivity 2.Exposure science related to risk assessment 3.Alternative toxicological test methods 4.Frameworks for evaluation and integration of data in regulatory evaluations 5.Harmonization across regulatory agencies 6.Read-across methods and evaluations -Contemporary Reviews on policy related Research issues -Letters to the Editor -Guest Editorials (by Invitation)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信