Omentoplasty for ventricular assist device infections: Encouraging outcomes

Ahmed M. El Banayosy MD , Susan George DNP, APRN, David W. Vanhooser MD, Hendra Setiadi PhD, Daniel R. Freno MD, Marshall T. Bell MD, Craig C. Elkins MD, Mircea R. Mihu MD, Douglas A. Horstmanshof MD, Aly El Banayosy MD, James W. Long MD, PhD
{"title":"Omentoplasty for ventricular assist device infections: Encouraging outcomes","authors":"Ahmed M. El Banayosy MD ,&nbsp;Susan George DNP, APRN,&nbsp;David W. Vanhooser MD,&nbsp;Hendra Setiadi PhD,&nbsp;Daniel R. Freno MD,&nbsp;Marshall T. Bell MD,&nbsp;Craig C. Elkins MD,&nbsp;Mircea R. Mihu MD,&nbsp;Douglas A. Horstmanshof MD,&nbsp;Aly El Banayosy MD,&nbsp;James W. Long MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jhlto.2025.100264","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>LVAD infections are associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. We explored the impact of surgical Omentoplasty (OMP) added to Incision and Debridement (I&amp;D) plus Antibiotic therapy (AB) on survival and infection-related readmissions in patients with LVAD infections.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Thirty-three patients with deep LVAD-specific infections were studied over a period of 12 years. Survival and readmissions for recurrent infection in subjects receiving I&amp;D and ABs alone (Group A, n = 15) were compared to those in whom OMP was added to I&amp;D and ABs (Group B, n = 18).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Baseline characteristics were similar between groups, as well as infectious organisms. Two-year survival was significantly improved in Group B (OMP + I&amp;D + ABs) as compared to Group A (I&amp;D + ABs without OMP) [77% vs. 7%; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001]. Recurrent infection-related readmissions were notably lower in Group B compared to Group A (0.18 vs. 0.24 admissions/patient-year), with a significant reduction within Group B following the application of OMP (0.13 to 0.06 admissions/patient-year). Following OMP, intravenous (IV) antibiotics were successfully replaced with oral long-term ABs in the 78% of patients. No long-term antibiotic-related complications were noted.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This report, comprising the most extensive such experience to date, indicates that combining surgical Omentoplasty (OMP) with incision and debridement (I&amp;D) plus antibiotic (AB) treatment is remarkably effective for suppressing deep LVAD infections, improving survival and decreasing infection-related readmissions. Filling the open space around an implanted LVAD with highly vascularized omentum, as a living tissue with anti-infective properties, appears to be effective for improving outcomes with LVAD infections.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100741,"journal":{"name":"JHLT Open","volume":"8 ","pages":"Article 100264"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JHLT Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S295013342500059X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

LVAD infections are associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. We explored the impact of surgical Omentoplasty (OMP) added to Incision and Debridement (I&D) plus Antibiotic therapy (AB) on survival and infection-related readmissions in patients with LVAD infections.

Methods

Thirty-three patients with deep LVAD-specific infections were studied over a period of 12 years. Survival and readmissions for recurrent infection in subjects receiving I&D and ABs alone (Group A, n = 15) were compared to those in whom OMP was added to I&D and ABs (Group B, n = 18).

Results

Baseline characteristics were similar between groups, as well as infectious organisms. Two-year survival was significantly improved in Group B (OMP + I&D + ABs) as compared to Group A (I&D + ABs without OMP) [77% vs. 7%; p < 0.001]. Recurrent infection-related readmissions were notably lower in Group B compared to Group A (0.18 vs. 0.24 admissions/patient-year), with a significant reduction within Group B following the application of OMP (0.13 to 0.06 admissions/patient-year). Following OMP, intravenous (IV) antibiotics were successfully replaced with oral long-term ABs in the 78% of patients. No long-term antibiotic-related complications were noted.

Conclusion

This report, comprising the most extensive such experience to date, indicates that combining surgical Omentoplasty (OMP) with incision and debridement (I&D) plus antibiotic (AB) treatment is remarkably effective for suppressing deep LVAD infections, improving survival and decreasing infection-related readmissions. Filling the open space around an implanted LVAD with highly vascularized omentum, as a living tissue with anti-infective properties, appears to be effective for improving outcomes with LVAD infections.
心室辅助装置感染的网膜成形术:令人鼓舞的结果
背景:lvad感染与大量的发病率和死亡率相关。我们探讨了手术网膜成形术(OMP)加切口清创(I&;D)加抗生素治疗(AB)对LVAD感染患者生存和感染相关再入院的影响。方法对33例lvad深度特异性感染患者进行了为期12年的研究。比较单独接受I&;D和抗体治疗的患者(A组,n = 15)与同时接受I&;D和抗体治疗的患者(B组,n = 18)的生存率和复发感染再入院率。结果两组之间的基线特征相似,感染性微生物也相似。与A组(不含OMP的I&;D + ABs)相比,B组(OMP + I&D + ABs)的两年生存率显著提高[77% vs. 7%;p & lt;0.001]。与A组相比,B组与复发感染相关的再入院率显著降低(0.18对0.24次/患者-年),在应用OMP后,B组的再入院率显著降低(0.13对0.06次/患者-年)。在OMP后,78%的患者成功地用口服长期抗体代替静脉注射(IV)抗生素。未发现长期抗生素相关并发症。结论本报告包含了迄今为止最广泛的此类经验,表明联合手术网膜成形术(OMP)与切口清创(I&;D)加抗生素(AB)治疗对于抑制深度LVAD感染,提高生存率和减少感染相关的再入院非常有效。在植入LVAD周围的开放空间内填充高度血管化的网膜,作为具有抗感染特性的活组织,似乎可以有效改善LVAD感染的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信